Audiotactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind individuals

Valeria Occelli,C. Spence,M. Zampini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.05.023

IF: 3.054

2008-09-01

Neuropsychologia

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Are all robotic technologies created equal? Comparing one of the latest image-free robotic technologies to all other robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty

Philip Huang,Michael Cross,Anshu Gupta,Dhara Intwala,Jill Ruppenkamp,Daniel Hoeffel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-024-05150-8

2024-10-12

Abstract:Background: Robotic-assisted technologies have been developed to increase surgical precision and reduce surgical variability in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Several different robotic systems have been introduced in the last decade for TKA. The DePuy Synthes VELYS™ Robotic-Assisted Solution (VRAS) is an imageless system designed to eliminate the need for preoperative CT scans and is one of the latest entrants in the rapidly evolving field of robotic technology in TKA. This study compared the clinical and economic outcomes associated with VRAS and other robotic-assisted technologies for primary TKA. Methods: A retrospective cohort study using the Premier Healthcare Database included patients who underwent primary TKA with VRAS or other robotic-assisted technologies from January 1, 2022, to April 30, 2023. The primary outcome for the study was hospital follow-up visits (revisits) within 90 days post-TKA. Secondary outcomes included readmission and revision rates within 90 days post-TKA, operating room time, length of stay, discharge status and hospital costs. Cohorts were balanced using propensity score fine stratification, and generalized linear models were constructed to evaluate outcomes. Results: This study included 827 VRAS TKA patients and 16,428 TKA patients treated with other robotic-assisted technologies. The 90-day all-cause and knee-related revisit rates were significantly lower for VRAS than for other robotic-assisted technologies (all-cause 13.9% vs. 22.8% and knee-related 2.8% vs. 5.4%, respectively; p value < 0.01). The all-cause and knee-related 90-day readmission rates were also lower for VRAS, although the differences were not statistically significant. The 90-day revision rates were similar for VRAS and other robotic-assisted technologies (0.48% vs. 0.45%), as was the operating room time (138 vs. 137 min). The 90-day knee-related cost for the VRAS cohort was $15,048 compared to $16,867 for other robotic technologies. Conclusions: This database study demonstrated that early postoperative revisit rates and total cost of care are lower for VRAS than for all other robotic-assisted technologies for TKA, while operating room time and discharge status were similar. These are important findings in ever-evolving healthcare systems that are increasingly cost conscious and cognizant of principles associated with value-based care.
A Cost Analysis of Traditional Versus Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed With an Imageless, Second-generation Robotic System

Justin Leal,Niall H. Cochrane,Billy I. Kim,Christopher T. Holland,Rhett Hallows,Thorsten Seyler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20240809-05

2024-08-19

Orthopedics

Abstract:Background: This study compared perioperative outcomes as well as encounter and 90-day costs between patients undergoing traditional vs robotic total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Materials and Methods: A total of 430 TKAs (215 rTKAs, 215 traditional) were retrospectively reviewed. All rTKAs were performed with an imageless, second-generation robotic system. Cohorts were propensity score matched by age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score. Perioperative data and 90-day complications were subsequently compared. Cox regression analyses evaluated survival to all-cause revisions. Univariable analyses compared total cost of care for the initial encounter and 90-day postoperative period. Multivariable regression analyses were then performed to evaluate associations with increased encounter and 90-day costs. Results: Patients undergoing rTKA had a higher incidence of discharge home (86.5% vs 60.0%; P <.001). The rTKA cohort trended toward a lower incidence of 90-day emergency department visits, and there was a significantly lower percentage of 90-day readmissions (4.2% vs 13.5%; P =.001). Cox hazard ratio demonstrated no difference in survival to all-cause revisions (hazard ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.5–3.7; P =.64). The cost of surgery was significantly higher in the rTKA cohort ($9292 vs $8392; P <.001); however, there was no difference in cost of encounter ($10,356.86 vs $10,396.44; P =.110) or at 90 days postoperatively ($11,103.89 vs $11,040.13; P =.739). rTKA did not have a significant association with increased cost at 90 days postoperatively (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.90–1.02; P =.180). Conclusion: rTKA had a higher intraoperative cost compared with traditional TKA. However, with increased home discharges and fewer 90-day readmissions, rTKA was not associated with increased cost at 90 days. [ Orthopedics . 202x;4x(x):xx–xx.]

orthopedics
Trends and epidemiology in robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty: Reduced complications and shorter hospital stays

David Maman,Lior Laver,Roland Becker,Loai Ahmad Takrori,Assil Mahamid,Binyamin Finkel,Hadar Gan‐Or,Yaniv Yonai,Yaron Berkovich

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12353

2024-07-19

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Introduction This study provides an in‐depth analysis of the immediate postoperative outcomes and implications or robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA‐TKA) compared with conventional TKA (C‐TKA), particularly with regard to mortality, complications, hospital stay and costs, drawing from a comprehensive nationwide data set. Methods The Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database, the largest all‐payer inpatient healthcare database in the United States, was used to identify all patients who underwent RA‐TKA or C‐TKA from 2016 to 2019. A total of 527,376 cases, representing 2,638,679 patients who underwent elective TKA were identified, of which 88,415 had RA‐TKA. To mitigate potential variations and selection bias in baseline characteristics between the two groups, a propensity score‐matched analysis was employed to further balance and refine our data set, resulting in 176,830 patients evenly distributed between the groups. Analysis was performed according to demographics, immediate post‐operative complications, and economic data, including payor class, length of stay and total charges. Results There was a marked shift towards RA‐TKA, from an initial 0.70% in 2016 to a notable 7.30% by 2019. Patients who underwent RA‐TKA were slightly younger (66.2 ± SD years), compared to the C‐TKA group (66.7 ± SD years). Hospital stay was 1.89 days and 2.29 days for RA‐TKA and C‐TKA, respectively. Charges metrics revealed slightly higher charges for RA‐TKA. Less postoperative complications were found in the RA‐TKA group, such as blood loss, anaemia, acute kidney injury, venous thromboembolism, pulmonary embolism, pneumonia and surgical wound complication. Even following the propensity score matching, these findings remained consistent and statistically significant. Conclusions RA‐TKA use in the United States has grown substantially in the last few years and has been associated with significantly reduced immediate post‐operative complications and length of hospital stay compared to C‐TKA, offering safer surgical management for TKA patients. Further studies on the short‐ and long‐term outcomes of RA‐TKA would improve the understanding of the full potential of this technology. Levels of Evidence Level III.

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences
Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates in Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: Large, Propensity Score–Matched Patient Cohorts

Cole C. Howell,Sietske Witvoet,Laura Scholl,Andrea Coppolecchia,Manoshi Bhowmik-Stoker,Antonia F. Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01117

IF: 4

2024-07-19

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Abstract:Introduction: There is a paucity of research comparing postoperative complication rates between manual total knee arthroplasty (M-TKA) and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA). This study aims to compare 90-day postoperative complication, readmission, and emergency department rates between RA-TKA and M-TKA. Methods: A retrospective review of a multihospital database identified patients who underwent TKA between January 2016 and May 2023. Surgeons who used the robotic-assisted surgery technique in 90% of their cases annually were excluded. This resulted in 15,999 cases (8,853 RA-TKAs; 7,146 M-TKAs) from 282 surgeons. RA-TKA and M-TKA cohorts were one-to-one matched based on patient sex, age, body mass index, hospital setting, surgeon experience, primary payer, and anesthesia type. Each cohort consisted of 7,146 patients (N = 14,292). 90-day revisits, specifically readmissions, readmissions with >23 hours of observation, and ED visit rates were compared between cohorts. Complications were classified according to the Clinical Classification Software schema and compared between cohorts. Mann-Whitney U, chi-squared, and Fisher exact tests, along with Bonferroni correction, were used to statistically compare cohorts. Results: All-cause 90-day readmission rates were 2.4% for RA-TKA and 2.6% for M-TKA ( P = 0.36). RA-TKA had fewer revisits (RA-TKA: 7.8%; M-TKA: 8.8%, P = 0.027) and rates of readmission with >23 hours of observation (RA-TKA: 1.4%; M-TKA: 2.0%, P = 0.003). RA-TKA had fewer hospital revisits due to joint stiffness (RA-TKA: 17 revisits; M-TKA: 42 revisits, P = 0.002) and chronic pain (RA-TKA: 1 revisit; M-TKA: 8 revisits, P = 0.039). Fewer readmissions were observed for acute injuries (lower extremity muscle/tendon strains) in the RA-TKA cohort (RA-TKA: 1; M-TKA: 9, P = 0.021). RA-TKA had fewer ED visits due to hematomas (RA-TKA: 0 visits; M-TKA: 7 visits, P = 0.016). Conclusion: In this retrospective matched cohort analysis, RA-TKA was associated with markedly fewer revisits and readmissions with >23 hours of observation compared with M-TKA. No differences in all-cause 90-day readmission were observed between cohorts. Level of Evidence: Level III Study Design: Retrospective review.

surgery,orthopedics
Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

Run Tian,Xudong Duan,Ning Kong,Xinhua Li,Jian Wang,Hua Tian,Zhanjun Shi,Shigui Yan,Jingyi Lyu,Kunzheng Wang,Pei Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000000002

2023-01-01

Abstract:This new robotic-assisted TKA system is safe and effective. The authors found that preoperative HKA angle deviation affects the postoperative HKA angle deviation. The robotic-assisted system has similar results to those reported by the traditional method with regard to restoring the mechanical axis of the leg and improving prosthesis alignment and clinical outcomes in patients with slight lower extremity alignment deviations preoperatively. For patients with severe preoperative lower extremity alignment deviations, the effectiveness in terms of the improvement in mechanical axis of the leg and prosthesis alignment were better with the robotic-assisted system, whereas the effectiveness of clinical outcomes was similar. A larger sample size and longer follow-up period are needed to determine whether the improved mechanical axis of the leg and prosthesis alignment observed with the robotic-assisted system can achieve better long-term radiographic and clinical outcomes.
Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty More Accurately Restored the Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio and the Insall-Salvati Index Compared to the Manual Technique; A Cohort-Matched Study.

A. Malkani,Antonia F. Chen,F. Orozco,F. Kolisek,Langan S. Smith,Linsen T Samuel,O. Mahoney,A. Sultan,Michael A Mont,A. Khlopas,M. Bhowmik‐Stoker,R. Molloy,N. Sodhi

2019-05-15

Abstract:INTRODUCTION Despite the demonstrated success of modern total knee arthroplasty (TKA), it remains a procedure that involves sophisticated preoperative planning and meticulous technique to reconstruct the mechanical axis, achieve ideal joint balance, and restore maximal range-of-motion (ROM). Recently, robotic-arm assisted TKAs have emerged as a promising new technology offering several technical advantages, and it is achieving excellent radiological results, including establishing the posterior condylar offset ratio (PCOR) and the Insall-Salvati Index (ISI). Studies have demonstrated that these parameters are surgically modifiable, and their accurate restoration (fewer mean differences) correlate with improved final joint range-of-motion. However, there is a paucity of studies that evaluate these parameters in light of performing robotic-arm assisted TKA. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to compare: 1) PCOR and 2) ISI restoration in a cohort of patients who underwent robotic-arm assisted versus manual TKA. MATERIALS AND METHODS We evaluated a series of 43 consecutive robotic-arm assisted (mean age 67 years; range, 46 to 79 years) and 39 manual total knee arthroplasties (mean age 66 years; range, 48 to 78 years) performed by seven fellowship-trained joint reconstructive surgeons. All surgeries were performed using medial para-patellar approaches by high-volume surgeons. Using the Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System, preoperative and four-to six-week postoperative radiographs were analyzed to determine the PCOR and patella height based on the ISI. RESULTS The mean postoperative PCOR was larger in manual TKA when compared to the robotic-assisted cohort (0.53 vs. 0.49; p=0.024). The absolute mean difference between pre- and postoperative PCOR was larger in manual when compared to robotic-arm assisted TKA (0.03 vs. 0.004; p=0.01). In addition, the number of patients who had postoperative ISI outside of the normal range (0.8 to 0.12) was higher in the manual cohort (12 vs. 4). CONCLUSION Patients who underwent TKA using robotic-arm assisted technology had smaller mean differences in PCOR which has been previously shown to correlate with better joint ROM at one year following surgery. In addition, these patients were less likely to have values outside of normal ISI, which means they are less likely to develop patella baja, a condition in which the patella would impinge onto the patellar component, leading to restricted flexion and overall decreased ROM.

Engineering,Medicine
Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot‐Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

Jiazheng Xu,Liangliang Li,Jun Fu,Chi Xu,Ming Ni,Wei Chai,Libo Hao,Guoqiang Zhang,Jiying Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13323

2022-07-20

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:We compared the early clinical outcomes of the RA‐TKA and CM‐TKA groups through a prospective study. The advantages of RA‐TKA in terms of radiographic results as well as inflammatory indicators and the disadvantages of prolonging the surgery are described. Objective Robot‐assisted surgery has been promoted worldwide in recent years. The development of a domestic orthopaedic robot and its clinical application are therefore of great significance. This study aimed to compare the early clinical and radiographic outcomes of domestic robot‐assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA‐TKA) with conventional manual total knee arthroplasty (CM‐TKA). Methods A total of 77 patients who underwent primary single‐sided TKA from June to December 2020 were prospectively enrolled; resulting in the inclusion of 72 patients. The patients were randomly divided into the RA‐TKA group (37 cases, with TKA being assisted by the Yuanhua Orthopaedic Robotic System) and the CM‐TKA group (35 cases, with TKA being performed using conventional tools). Knee function was evaluated by the knee range of motion (ROM), the American Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC). Postoperative radiographic results were evaluated by full‐length weight‐bearing X‐rays of the lower limb and anteroposterior and lateral X‐rays of the knee were obtained preoperatively and at 90 days postoperative. The operative duration, blood loss, postoperative knee function, radiographic outcomes, and incidence of complications were compared by Student's t‐test, Mann–Whitney U test, or chi‐square test. Serum levels of inflammatory markers before the operation and 1, 3, and 30 days after the operation were recorded and compared between the two groups. Results The operation was significantly longer in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group (154.3 vs 115.2 min, p 0.05). The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis was not statistically different between the two groups. In the radiographic findings at 90 days postoperatively we found the frequency of lateral tibial component (LTC) angle outliers was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group (3.0% vs 29.4%, p = 0.003). The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was significantly lower in the RA‐TKA group than in the CM‐TKA group on day 1 after surgery (9.9 vs 12.7, p = 0.024). Conclusions RA‐TKA requires more time than CM‐TKA, which may be related to the learning curve and intraoperative registration. The short‐term postoperative knee functional outcomes had no differences between the two groups, and RA‐TKA improved the accuracy of tibial component alignment. Further follow‐up studies are required to investigate the long‐term outcomes.

orthopedics
Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations

Meredith P. Crizer,Amer Haffar,Andrew Battenberg,Mikayla McGrath,Ryan Sutton,Jess H. Lonner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4770960

2021-07-14

Advances in Orthopedics

Abstract:Robotic technology has reduced the errors of implant alignment in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), but its impact on functional recovery after UKA is poorly defined. The purpose of this study was to compare early functional recovery, pain levels, and satisfaction in UKA performed with either robotic assistance or conventional methods. A retrospective analysis was performed on 89 matched consecutive patients who underwent outpatient UKA by a single physician using either conventional instruments (n = 39) or robotic methods (n = 50), with otherwise identical perioperative protocols. Outcomes studied included Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), new Knee Society Score (KSS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR.), VR/SF-12, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and perioperative opioid consumption. Patients in the robotic cohort had superior early functional outcomes, with greater LEFS (conventional = 23; robotic = 31) at 1 week post-op p = 0.015 and KOOS-JR (conventional = 74; robotic = 81) at up to 6 months post-op p = 0.037 ; these two values remained statistically significant after mixed-model regression analysis p = 0.010 ; p = 0.023 , respectively. At 1 year post-op, expectations were more likely to be met in those who received robotic assistance p = 0.06 . No differences were reported with respect to postoperative opioid usage p = 0.320 , reoperations p = 1.00 , and complications p = 0.628 . Robotic-assisted UKA resulted in more rapid recovery and less early postoperative pain and were more likely to meet expectations than conventional UKA, although functional differences equilibrated by 1 year postoperatively. Further follow-up is necessary to determine if implant durability is impacted by robotics.
Differential interaction between 5-HT3 receptors and GABAergic neurons inhibiting acetylcholine release in rat entorhinal cortex slices

M. Dı́ez-Ariza,M. Ramírez,B. Lasheras,J. Rı́o

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-8993(98)00562-9

IF: 3.61

1998-08-10

Brain Research

Abstract:
Robotic-arm–assisted Knee Arthroplasty Associated With Favorable In-hospital Metrics and Exponentially Rising Adoption Compared With Manual Knee Arthroplasty

S. Koroukian,N. Piuzzi,N. Schiltz,Ahmed K. Emara,V. Krebs,A. Klika,Guangjin Zhou,R. Molloy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00146

IF: 4

2021-05-26

Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons

Abstract:Background: Technology-assisted knee arthroplasty (KA), including robotic-arm-assisted knee arthroplasty (RA-KA) and computer-assisted (CA-KA) knee arthroplasty, was developed to improve surgical accuracy of implant positioning and alignment, which may influence implant stability, longevity, and functional outcomes. However, despite increased adoption over the past decade; its value is still to be determined. Questions/Purpose: This study aimed to compare robotic-arm (RA)-KA, CA-KA, and manual (M)-KA regarding (1) in-hospital metrics (length of stay [LOS], discharge disposition, in-hospital complications, and hospitalization-episode costs), (2) characterize annual utilization trends, and (3) future RA-KA and CA-KA utilization projections. Methods: National Inpatient Sample was queried for primary KAs (unicompartmental/total; 2008 to 2018). KAs were classified by modality (M-KA/CA-KA/RA-KA) using International Classification of Disease-9/10 codes. A propensity score-matched comparison of LOS, discharge disposition, in-hospital complications (implant-related mechanical or procedure-related nonmechanical complications), and costs was conducted. Trends and projected utilization rates were estimated. Results: After propensity score matched to their respective M-KA cohorts, RA-KA and CA-KA exhibited shorter LOS (RA-KA versus M-KA: 2.0 ± 1.4 days versus 2.5 ± 1.8 days; P < 0.001; CA-KA versus M-KA: 2.7 ± 1.4 days versus 2.9 ± 1.6 days; P < 0.001) and in-hospital implant-related mechanical complications (P < 0.05, each). RA-KA demonstrated lower nonhome discharge (P < 0.001) and in-hospital procedure-related nonmechanical complications (P = 0.005). RA-KA had lower in-hospital costs ($16,881 ± 7,085 versus $17,320 ± 12,820; P < 0.001), whereas CA-KA exhibited higher costs ($18,411 ± 7,783 versus $17,716 ± 8,451; P < 0.001). RA-KA utilization increased from <0.1% in 2008 to 4.3% in 2018. CA-KA utilization rose temporarily to 6.2% in 2014, then declined to pre-2010 levels in 2018 (4.5%). Projections indicate that RA-KA and CA-KA will represent 49.9% (95% confidence interval, 41.1 to 59.9) and 6.2% (95% confidence interval, 5.3% to 7.2%) of KAs by 2030. Discussion: RA-KA may provide value through improving in-hospital metrics and mitigating net costs. Similar advantages may not be reliably attainable with CA-RA. Because RA-KA is projected to reach half of all knee arthroplasties done in the United States by 2030, further cost analyses and long-term studies are warranted.

Engineering,Medicine
Robotic assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Ahmed Daoub,Kaif Qayum,Ravi Patel,Amr Selim,Robin Banerjee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02048-9

2024-10-09

Abstract:The aim of this study is To compare robotic-assisted and conventional total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on both short- and long-term outcomes A systematic review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for relevant studies. The studies included were randomised controlled trials directly comparing robotic-assisted versus conventional TKA. The outcomes were pooled as mean difference (MD) or risk ratio (RR), with 95% confidence interval. RevMan software version 5.4 was used for performing the statistical analysis. Nine studies deemed eligible for inclusion. The data showed a significant favouring of robotic-assisted than the conventional TKA in mechanical alignment, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and femoral coronal plane outliers (MD = - 1.10, 95% CI [- 1.51, - 0.69], p < 0.00001), (MD = - 1.19, 95% CI [- 2.35, - 0.03], p = 0.04), and (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.30, 0.80], p = 0.004), respectively. On the other hand, conventional TKA was better in range of motion-flexion (long-term) than the robotic-assisted one (MD = - 3.02, 95% CI [- 3.68, - 2.37], p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences between them in knee society score-knee score, knee society score-function score, change in hospital for special surgery (HSS) knee rating scale, and change in range of motion-extension (MD = - 0.36, 95% CI [- 2.43, 1.70], p = 0.73), (MD = - 0.34, 95% CI [- 2.36, 1.68], p = 0.74), (MD = 0.78, 95% CI [- 0.84, 2.40], p = 0.34), and (MD = 0.16, 95% [- 1.32, 1.64], p = 0.83), respectively. Robotic-assisted TKA demonstrated better outcomes than conventional TKA in terms of mechanical alignment and WOMAC scores. However, the conventional TKA showed a better range of motion-flexion in the long term. More data are needed to assess long-term outcomes comprehensively.
Robot-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: trauma maker or trauma savior? A prospective, randomized cohort study

Zhonghua Xu,Hua Li,Zaiyang Liu,Jie Li,Jun Zhang,Min Wang,Yuan Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkac034

2022-01-01

Burns & Trauma

Abstract:Abstract Background Robotic assistance has been increasingly employed to improve the operative precision in modern knee surgery. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the trauma effect of one of the first domestically developed orthopedic surgical robots in China in a clinical trial of robot-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA). Methods A total of 33 patients who underwent unilateral TKA for end-stage osteoarthritis were randomized to receive RA-TKA (17 cases) or conventional manual TKA (CM-TKA) in our institution in 2020. The trauma effects of the 4 main indicators with 48 sub-indicators in terms of subsectional operative time, inflammation and coagulation markers, physical and radiographical analyses of osteotomy deviation, and postoperative comfort were analyzed. Results Subsectional operative time analysis showed that the times for bone cutting and gap balancing with RA-TKA were 5.3 and 2.2 min shorter than those with CM-TKA (p = 0.010, p = 0.02), respectively. Arterial blood gas indicators (partial pressure of carbon dioxide, partial pressure of oxygen and SO2) 24 h after RA-TKA, as well as the white blood cell count and neutrophil ratio, were significantly lower than those after CM-TKA (p < 0.05). Inflammatory markers at 72 h after surgery showed the increments of C-reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and D-dimer of RA-TKA declined by 180.7, 22.0 and 1050.0% (p < 0.05), respectively, referenced to the preoperative baseline values, as compared to CM-TKA. Mechanical deviation distribution exhibited percentages of region I errors for RA-TKA and CM-TKA of 76.5% and 27.1% (p = 0.000), respectively, and the success rates of one-time osteotomy were 94.1% and 62.5% (p = 0.039), respectively. Radiographical verification showed RA-TKA was more conducive to achieving mechanical alignment and ideal tibial component azimuths. Postoperative efficacy showed that patients were more comfortable after RA-TKA in terms of reduced administration of tranexamic acid, hydrocortisone and the utilization rate of temporary intensive opioid analgesics. No statistical difference in patient-reported outcome measures and complications were recorded between the two groups during continuous observation. Conclusions Compared with CM-TKA, RA-TKA decreases rather than increases trauma. It might shorten the time required for bone cutting and gap balancing, reduce mechanical errors related to the osteotomy and prosthesis position, and improve the accuracy of the mechanical alignment reconstruction. RA-TKA is also favorable in promoting postoperative comfort and minimizing inflammatory response and drug consumption. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2000031282) approved registration on 26 March 2020.

dermatology,surgery,emergency medicine
Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Radiographic Outliers for Low-volume Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgeons

Connor Byrne,Caleb Durst,Kevin Rezzadeh,Zachary Rockov,Charles Moon,Sean Rajaee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2023.101303

2024-01-23

Abstract:Background: Most studies evaluating robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA TKA) analyzed the advantages offered to high-volume surgeons. This study aims to determine if RA TKA improves radiographic or clinical outcomes for low-volume, non-arthroplasty-trained surgeons. Methods: Radiographic and early clinical outcomes of 19 RA TKAs and 41 conventional TKAs, all performed by a single, non-arthroplasty-trained orthopaedic surgeon, were compared. Radiographic outliers were based on surgeon targets and defined as tibial posterior slope outside of 0°-5°, tibial tray varus outside of 0°-3°, and the presence of notching. Clinical outcomes included inpatient narcotic usage, length of stay, range of motion, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System scores. Results: There was a significant decrease in tibial slope outliers (RA TKA 0% vs non-RA TKA 22%, P = .024) and notching incidence (RA TKA 0% vs non-RA TKA 19.5%, P = .044) in the RA group. Tibial tray varus/valgus outliers trended lower in the RA TKA group (10.0% vs 26.8%, P = .189). Length of stay was significantly shorter in RA patients (48.0 hours [standard deviation: 25.5] vs 67.7 hours [34.3], P = .038). RA patients trended toward lower in postoperative inpatient total mean morphine equivalents usage (79.9 [89.2] vs 140.1 [169.3], P = .142) and inpatient mean morphine equivalents usage per day (30.36 [26.9] vs 45.6 [36.7], P = .105). There was no significant difference in Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System scores or range of motion at first and second postoperative follow-up within 3 months. Conclusions: RA TKA reduced the incidence of radiographic outliers when compared to conventional TKA for a low-volume arthroplasty surgeon.
Rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee.

E. Trickey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.50B2.334

1968-05-01

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - British Volume

Abstract:1. Seventeen cases of knee injury are described in which the predominant lesion was rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Seven were treated conservatively and ten by surgical repair. 2. Most cases occurred in motor cyclists. 3. The extent of the rupture should be determined by examination under anaesthesia. 4. Early surgical repair is indicated for complete rupture. 5. An effective method of repair is described.
Lower Intraoperative and Immediate Postoperative Complications in Robotic Versus Conventional Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Over 360,000 Patients

Vishesh Khanna,Garrett Sohn,Surya Khanna,Munis Ashraf,Mehul M Mittal,Varatharaj Mounsamy,Senthil Sambandam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.57726

2024-04-06

Cureus

Abstract:Purpose: Although a trend of an improved alignment with robotic total hip arthroplasty (THA) over conventional methods has surfaced from recent series, it is unknown whether these results translate into meaningful enhancements in postoperative outcomes. To address this lack in the literature, we compared the perioperative morbidity and mortality with robotic and conventional THA in a large national cohort of 367,894 patients. We hypothesized that no significant differences would exist in the outcomes between the two groups. Methods: Records were extracted from 2016-2019 from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project which is the largest in-patient database in the United States. From 367,894 THAs, robotics were employed for 7,863 patients. The remaining 360,031 conventional THAs served as controls. The two groups were compared for demographics, admission, and hospital stay details including costs, and mortality and morbidity data including medical and surgical complications. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic data while analytical statistics including t-tests, chi-squared tests, Fischer exact test, and Pearson chi-squared tests were used for perioperative outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p<0.005. Results: Demographic distributions between robotic and conventional THA groups displayed similar age and sex characteristics. Shorter mean lengths of stay (1.87 days) were seen in robotic THA versus conventional THA (2.33 days) while higher costs were noted for the former (mean $68,686.71 vs $66,840.39) (p<0.005). Low overall mortality (0.03% robotic, 0.09% conventional) was seen in both groups (p>0.005). Higher comparative incidences of anemia, acute renal failure, and pneumonia were seen in conventional THA (p<0.005) while no significant differences were noted for other complications including myocardial infarction, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and cardiac arrest (p>0.005). Among others, lower dislocation rates, mechanical complications, periprosthetic joint infection, and periprosthetic fractures were seen with robotic THA (p<0.005). Wound complications and superficial infection rates did not differ between the two groups (p>0.005). Conclusions: Evidence has emerged from our results to support more routine adaptation of the robotic option of performing a THA. These can be based on lower local, systemic, and mechanical complications as demonstrated by the present study. Further evaluation of these results in follow-up would help establish the foothold of robotic surgery in total hip replacement in the modern context.
Does Robotic Assisted Technique Improve Patient Utility in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study

Matteo Ratti,Daniele Ceriotti,Riccardo Rescinito,Rabia Bibi,Massimiliano Panella

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12161650

2024-08-20

Health Care

Abstract:Background: Even if robotic assisted total knee arthroplasty (RATKA) is a widely used technique, there is still a gap of knowledge about whether this technology is effective in improving the patient utility. This measure is of paramount importance for conducting cost effectiveness analysis. The aim of this study was to compare the utility measure derived from self-reported outcomes questionnaires in patients who underwent RATKA compared to patients who underwent the manual surgery. Methods: We compared 72 patients operated with a robotic technique with 70 operated with traditional technique. The utility data were collected with the WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis index) self-administrated questionnaire that investigates pain, stiffness and functionality of the patients, an then mapped to a utility value through a validated transforming function. We performed three surveys: the first one before the intervention (t0), the second one 1 year after the surgery (t1) and the third one at the 2 year follow up (t2). Results: we observed higher utility values in both groups. In detail, the mean utility score in the RATKA group increased from 0.37 to 0.71 (t1) and 0.78 (t2), while in the conventional group it increased from 0.41 to 0.78 (t1) and 0.78 (t2). The fixed effect coefficients of t1 and t2 were found to be 0.37 and 0.363 (p < 0.001 for both). The coefficient of the robotic technique, along with its interaction with the t1 and t2 time effect was non-significant. Conclusions: Even if at t1 the utility of patient who underwent RATKA were lower, at longer follow up (t2) we found no significant difference compared to traditional technique, leaving the superiority of robotic assisted technique yet to be proved. Our results may be useful for calculating the gained or lost Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), so that the health care system (or an insurance company) could make an appropriate decision whether to fund the robotic approach or not, after a careful assessment of the incremental costs incurred.

health care sciences & services,health policy & services
One-Year Patient Outcomes for Robotic-Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robert C Marchand,Nipun Sodhi,Hiba K Anis,Joseph Ehiorobo,Jared M Newman,Kelly Taylor,Caitlin Condrey,Matthew S Hepinstall,Michael A Mont,Robert C. Marchand,Hiba K. Anis,Jared M. Newman,Matthew S. Hepinstall,Michael A. Mont

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-1683977

2019-04-08

The Journal of Knee Surgery

Abstract:Abstract Although there are many studies on the alignment advantages when using the robotic arm–assisted (RAA) system for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there have been questions regarding patient-reported outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to use this index to compare: (1) total, (2) physical function, and (3) pain scores for manual versus RAA patients. We compared 53 consecutive RAA to 53 consecutive manual TKAs. No differences in preoperative scores were found between the cohorts. Patients were administered a modified Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index satisfaction survey preoperatively and at 1-year postoperatively. The results were broken down to: (1) total, (2) physical function, and (3) pain scores. Univariate analysis with independent samples t-tests was used to compare 1-year postoperative scores. Multivariate models with stepwise backward linear regression were utilized to evaluate the associations between scores and surgical technique, age, sex, as well as body mass index (BMI). Statistical analyses were performed with a p < 0.05 to determine significance. The RAA cohort had significantly improved mean total (6 ± 6 vs. 9 ± 8 points, p = 0.03) and physical function scores (4 ± 4 vs. 6 ± 5 points, p = 0.02) when compared with the manual cohort. The mean pain score for the RAA cohort (2 ± 3 points [range, 0–14 points]) was also lower than that for the manual cohort (3 ± 4 points [range, 0–11 points]) (p = 0.06). On backward linear regression analyses, RAA was found to be significantly associated with more improved total (β coefficient [β] −0.208, standard error [SE] 1.401, p < 0.05), function (β = 0.216, SE = 0.829, p < 0.05), and pain scores (β −0.181, SE = 0.623, p = 0.063). The RAA technique was found to have the strongest association with improved scores when compared with age, gender, and BMI. This study suggests that RAA patients may have short-term improvements at minimum 1-year postoperatively. However, longer term follow-up with greater sample sizes is needed to further validate these results.
Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-arm-assisted versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Xiao Geng,Yuhang Zheng,Yang Li,Minwei Zhao,Yanqing Liu,Zijian Li,Hong Cai,Ming Zhang,Xinfeng Yan,Zhiwen Sun,Xin Lv,Feng Guo,Feng Li,Hua Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14196

Abstract:Objective: A robotic system was recently introduced to improve prosthetic alignment during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this multicenter, prospective, randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to determine whether robotic-arm-assisted TKA improves clinical and radiological outcomes when compared to conventional TKA. Methods: One hundred and thirty patients who underwent primary TKA were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial, which was conducted at three hospitals. Five patients were lost to follow-up 6 weeks after surgery. Therefore, 125 participants (63 in the intervention group and 62 in the control group) remained in the final analysis. The primary outcome was the rate at which the mechanical axis of the femur deviated by less than 3° from the mechanical axis of the tibia. This was evaluated by full-length weight-bearing X-rays of the lower limb 6 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included operation times, 6-week postoperative functional outcomes evaluated by the American Knee Society score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC), short form-36 (SF-36) health survey results, and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs). Results: At 6 weeks postoperatively, we found that the rate of radiographic inliers was significantly higher in the intervention group (78.7% vs 51.6%; p = 0.00; 95% confidence interval, 10.9% to 43.2%). The operation was significantly longer in the intervention group than in the control group (119.5 vs 85.0 min; p = 0.00). There were no significant differences in the 6-week postoperative functional outcomes, SF-36, AEs, and SAEs between the two groups. There were no AEs or SAEs that were determined to be "positively related" to the robotic system. Conclusion: Robotic-arm-assisted TKA is safe and effective, as demonstrated in this trial.
Integrity of the exon 6 sequence is essential for tissue-specific alternative splicing of human leukocyte common antigen pre-mRNA

A. Y. Tsai,M. Streuli,H. Saito

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/mcb.9.10.4550-4555.1989

IF: 5.069

1989-10-01

Molecular and Cellular Biology

Abstract:By alternative splicing, exons 4, 5, and 6 of the human leukocyte common antigen (LCA) gene are included in B-cell mRNA but excluded from thymocyte mRNA. A mini-LCA gene that contains only LCA exons 2, 6, and 8 faithfully reproduces this tissue-specific alternative splicing in mouse B and thymocyte cell lines. Elimination of almost all of the intron sequences associated with exon 6 had no effect on the alternative splicing, while linker-scanning analysis showed that a significant length of the exon 6 sequence is essential for alternative splicing.
Aetiology of patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty in the era of robotic-assisted technology

Jonathan Gardner,Elliott R Roman,Rohat Bhimani,Sam J Mashni,John E Whitaker,Langan S Smith,Andrew Swiergosz,Arthur L Malkani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.59.BJO-2024-0099.R1

2024-09-12

Abstract:Aims: Patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with manual jig-based instruments has been reported to be as high as 30%. Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) has been increasingly used in an effort to improve patient outcomes, however there is a paucity of literature examining patient satisfaction after RA-TKA. This study aims to identify the incidence of patients who were not satisfied following RA-TKA and to determine factors associated with higher levels of dissatisfaction. Methods: This was a retrospective review of 674 patients who underwent primary TKA between October 2016 and September 2020 with a minimum two-year follow-up. A five-point Likert satisfaction score was used to place patients into two groups: Group A were those who were very dissatisfied, dissatisfied, or neutral (Likert score 1 to 3) and Group B were those who were satisfied or very satisfied (Likert score 4 to 5). Patient demographic data, as well as preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures, were compared between groups. Results: Overall, 45 patients (6.7%) were in Group A and 629 (93.3%) were in Group B. Group A (vs Group B) had a higher proportion of male sex (p = 0.008), preoperative chronic opioid use (p < 0.001), preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.01), prior anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (p < 0.001), and preoperative symptomatic lumbar spine disease (p = 0.004). Group A was also younger (p = 0.023). Multivariate analysis revealed preoperative opioid use (p = 0.012), prior ACL reconstruction (p = 0.038), male sex (p = 0.006), and preoperative psychotropic medication use (p = 0.001) as independent predictive factors of patient dissatisfaction. Conclusion: The use of RA-TKA demonstrated a high rate of patient satisfaction (629 of 674, 93.3%). Demographics for patients not satisfied following RA-TKA included: male sex, chronic opioid use, chronic psychotropic medication use, and prior ACL reconstruction. Patients in these groups should be identified preoperatively and educated on realistic expectations given their comorbid conditions.

Audiotactile temporal order judgments in sighted and blind individuals

Are all robotic technologies created equal? Comparing one of the latest image-free robotic technologies to all other robotic systems for total knee arthroplasty

A Cost Analysis of Traditional Versus Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed With an Imageless, Second-generation Robotic System

Trends and epidemiology in robotic‐assisted total knee arthroplasty: Reduced complications and shorter hospital stays

Postoperative Complications and Readmission Rates in Robotic-Assisted Versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: Large, Propensity Score–Matched Patient Cohorts

Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is more advantageous for knees with severe deformity: a randomized controlled trial study design.

Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty More Accurately Restored the Posterior Condylar Offset Ratio and the Insall-Salvati Index Compared to the Manual Technique; A Cohort-Matched Study.

Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Robot‐Assisted Versus Conventional Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

Robotic Assistance in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Results in Superior Early Functional Recovery and Is More Likely to Meet Patient Expectations

Differential interaction between 5-HT3 receptors and GABAergic neurons inhibiting acetylcholine release in rat entorhinal cortex slices

Robotic-arm–assisted Knee Arthroplasty Associated With Favorable In-hospital Metrics and Exponentially Rising Adoption Compared With Manual Knee Arthroplasty

Robotic assisted versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Robot-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty: trauma maker or trauma savior? A prospective, randomized cohort study

Robotic-assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Reduces Radiographic Outliers for Low-volume Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgeons

Rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament of the knee.

Lower Intraoperative and Immediate Postoperative Complications in Robotic Versus Conventional Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Over 360,000 Patients

Does Robotic Assisted Technique Improve Patient Utility in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Comparative Retrospective Cohort Study

One-Year Patient Outcomes for Robotic-Arm-Assisted versus Manual Total Knee Arthroplasty

Early Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Robotic-arm-assisted versus Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Integrity of the exon 6 sequence is essential for tissue-specific alternative splicing of human leukocyte common antigen pre-mRNA

Aetiology of patient dissatisfaction following primary total knee arthroplasty in the era of robotic-assisted technology