Abstract:Background: The knee is the most commonly injured joint because of its anatomical structure, its exposure to external forces, and its functional demands. Orthopaedic surgeons previously relied on clinical evaluation for diagnosing any internal derangement of the knee joint. With the advent of new clinical methods for diagnosing ligament injuries and cartilage defects, there are very less studies comparing the accuracy of all three methods, clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy to reach a definitive diagnosis. Objective: This study aims to compare the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and predictive values of clinical examination and MRI with that of arthroscopy which is the ideal investigation of choice for cartilage defects and internal derangements of the knee. Material and methods: A prospective, observational and hospital-based study was done on patients with internal derangement of knee and cartilage defects. Clinical examination (based on the clinical tests for each ligament), MRI (1.5 T) and arthroscopy were done on all patients, the findings of which were compared using the Chi-square test. The following parameters were assessed while using arthroscopy as the gold standard of reference: accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Results: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was the most common ligament to be injured followed by the medial meniscus. The overall accuracy of clinical evaluation and MRI to diagnose meniscal injuries was found to be 94% and 91% respectively. The clinical examination had sensitivity and specificity of 96% and 82% in diagnosing ACL tears, respectively, whereas MRI had sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 76% respectively. For the medial meniscus, the clinical examination had sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 96% respectively whereas MRI had a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89%. We observed that the accuracy of MRI for grading ACL and meniscal tears was similar i.e. 79% and 78% respectively, but was slightly low (70%) for grading of chondromalacia patellae. Conclusion: This study supports the use of MRI and clinical assessment in the diagnosis of chondral defects and internal knee derangement. Clinical tests are reliable and have high sensitivity in diagnosing ACL tears and chondral defects when compared to MRI. Not all lesions should routinely undergo MRI for diagnostic purposes; only a few circumstances warrant its usage. MRI is less reliable in grading ACL tears, meniscal tears and chondral injuries.

Editorial Commentary: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Not Inferior to the Gold Standard of Diagnostic Arthroscopy for Identification of Wrist Ligamentous Pathology

Reliability of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Posterior Ligamentous Complex Injury Associated with Thoracic and Lumbar Fractures

Editorial Commentary: Supplemental Wrist Arthroscopy May Not Be the Key to Improving Outcomes in Surgical Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Arthrography for Wrist Ligamentous Injuries - A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis

High-resolution MRI (3T-MRI) in diagnosis of wrist pain: is diagnostic arthroscopy still necessary?

Comparison of Clinical, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Arthroscopic Findings in Assessment of Cartilage Defects and Internal Derangement of Knee

Diagnostic accuracy of wrist MRI in comparison to wrist arthroscopy regarding TFCC lesions in clinical practice

Role of Wrist Arthroscopy in Traumatic Wrist Conditions

Editorial Commentary: Small Labral Size on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is an Indication for Labral Reconstruction in the Setting of Revision Hip Arthroscopy

Comparison of MRI versus Arthroscopy in Assessment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of The Knee Keeping Arthroscopy as Gold Standard

Bone Marrow Edema at Ligament Insertion is an Accurate MRI Sign of Deltoid Ligament Injury

Direct MR Arthrography in the Diagnosis of Injury of the Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex in the Wrist

Editorial Commentary: Magnetic Resonance Imaging May Underestimate Hip Femoral Version Versus Computed Tomography Scan: Both May Be Optimized Using 3-Dimensional Imaging

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Indirect Signs for Anterior Instability of the Lateral Meniscus in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients

Clinical Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Knee Joint Sports Injury

Scaphoid fractures: has magnetic resonance imaging become a cost-effective alternative to definitive diagnosis?

MRI for Scaphoid Nonunion: Utilization Rates, Factors Associated with Utilization, and Subsequent Vascularized Bone Graft Use

Comparative reliability and diagnostic performance of conventional 3T magnetic resonance imaging and 1.5T magnetic resonance arthrography for the evaluation of internal derangement of the hip

Detection of scapholunate interosseous ligament injury using dynamic computed tomography-derived arthrokinematics: A prospective clinical trial

Editorial Commentary: Olecranon Bone Autografting Combined With an Arthroscopic Approach for the Treatment Scaphoid Nonunion-An Important Technique for Wrist Surgeons

Imaging Diagnosis for Chronic Lateral Ankle Ligament Injury: a Systemic Review with Meta-Analysis