Searching for the Ideal Class III Antiarrhythmic Agent: How Pure Should They Be?

Bramahn . Singh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107424849700200401
1997-10-01
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics
Abstract:Division of Cardiology and the Department of Medicine, Veterans Affairs Medical Center and the Department of Medicine, UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California. Reprint requests: Bramah N. Singh, MD, PhD, Section of Cardiology 691/111E, Veterans Affairs Medical Center of West Los Angeles, Wilshire and Sawtelle Boulevards, Los Angeles, CA, 90073. Methods to control cardiac arrhythmias, both supraventricular and ventricular, continue to evolve with reasonably rapid introduction and refinements of both invasive as well as noninvasive approaches. The most striking recent advances have been radiofrequency catheter ablation and the implantable devices, with the focus on arrhythmia cure on the one hand and reduction in mortality on the other ( 1,2). In contrast, in the introduction of newer drugs with entirely new modes of action that might match the success attained with invasive approaches, progress has been modest and at best tentative; however, the results of the two Cardiac
What problem does this paper attempt to address?