Antipredator responses of three Daphnia species within the D. longispina species complex to two invertebrate predators
Marjohn Yucada Baludo,Pelita Octorina,Andrew Beckerman,Dietmar Straile
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10841
IF: 3.167
2024-01-10
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:This study addresses the gap in predator–prey research by investigating the plasticity of predator‐induced defenses within coexisting Daphnia species. Using a common garden experiment, responses to two invertebrate predators were examined, revealing species‐specific and trait‐specific antipredator reactions. Unique defensive adaptations and the independent evolution of microstructures as defensive modules were observed, highlighting the complexity of predator‐induced strategies across species. Prey communities in natural environments face a diverse array of predators with distinct hunting techniques. However, most studies have focused only on the interactions between a single prey species and one or more predators and typically only one of many induced defense traits, which limits our understanding of the broader effects of predators on prey communities. In this study, we conducted a common garden experiment using five clones each of three Daphnia species (D. cucullata, D. galeata, and D. longispina) from the D. longispina species complex to investigate the plasticity of predator‐induced defenses in response to two predators in a community ecology setting. Five clones from each species were subjected to predator kairomones from two closely related invertebrate predators that are common in several European lakes, Bythotrephes longimanus or Leptodora kindtii for a duration of 10 days, and the morphological traits of body size, head size, spina size, and the presence of spinules on the ventral and dorsal carapace margins were measured. We show that among the species within this species complex there are different antipredator reactions to the invertebrate predators. The induced responses exhibited were species, trait, and predator‐specific. Notably, D. galeata and D. cucullata developed distinctive helmets as defensive mechanisms, while microdefenses were induced in D. galeata and D. longispina, but not in D. cucullata. This demonstrates that the expression of micro‐ and macrodefenses across species was unrelated, highlighting the possible independent evolution of microstructures as defensive modules in Daphnia's antipredator strategies. This study is the first to document both micro‐ and macrodefensive phenotypic plasticity in three co‐occurring Daphnia species within the D. longispina species complex. The differences in inducible defenses may have a substantial impact on how these three species cohabit with Bythotrephes and Leptodora.
ecology,evolutionary biology