Similar benefits with dialectical behaviour therapy or general psychiatric management for people with borderline personality disorder

Jamie D. Bedics
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2012-100998
2012-11-17
Evidence-Based Mental Health
Abstract:ED FROM McMain SF, Guimond T, Streiner DL, et al. Dialectical behavior therapy compared with general psychiatric management for borderline personality disorder: clinical outcomes and functioning over a 2 year follow-up. Am J Psychiatry 2012;169:650–21. Correspondence to: Dr Shelley McMain; shelley_mcmain@camh.net Sources of funding: The Canadian Institute for Health Research. CO M M EN TA RY The treatment efficacy for manualised, emotionfocused psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder (BPD) is well documented. The accumulation of these studies has provided hope for what was once considered an intractable, lifethreatening condition. Despite these advances, questions about these treatments remain, including the longevity of the outcomes, the extent to which treatments impact multiple domains of functioning, and the degree to which specialised BPD therapies are unique or operate under a common set of therapeutic ingredients. This study has extended prior work by examining the benefits of two specialised BPD treatments (ie, dialectical behaviour therapy and general psychiatric management) over a 3-year period including 2 years of naturalistic follow-up. The equivalence in follow-up outcomes across treatments and primary and secondary outcomes is consistent with the original treatment study. Although not tested directly, the study highlights that effective treatments for BPD require a specialised, comprehensive team approach. Each treatment condition involved manualised interventions, training in suicide management, multiple treatment modalities and weekly supervision meetings. The extent to which each component is necessary, or contributes to the outcomes is unclear. A components analysis for improved feasibility of implementation would be the next logical step in this research. The study also showed a large percentage of sustained unemployment and psychiatric disability, despite achieving over 50% diagnostic remission of BPD in both treatments at 1-year follow-up and 2-year follow-up. The fact that a high percentage of participants were not working or off disability is not surprising given that neither treatment explicitly targeted these outcomes nor was it a hypothesised goal of the original study. It also seems unlikely that symptom remission would be sufficient to compel participants into the workforce without an explicit therapeutic focus on these goals. Instead, the results highlight the continued need for psychotherapeutic care following symptom remission if additional client goals are to be achieved.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?