Abstract:Biases in perceived 2D orientation are asymmetric in the frontal plane: Deviations from horizontal are exaggerated such that a line of 37° from horizontal appears to be 45° (Durgin & Li, 2011). How flexible is the reference frame within which these biases occur? Last year (VSS2012) we showed that these biases stayed with perceived external horizontal/vertical axes in tilted observers. Here we show that, once depth compression (under-constancy) is taken into account for obliquely-viewed planes, the asymmetrical biases remain. Participants (N = 56) made orientation estimates in four virtual display types. In the first and the last displays, oriented lines appeared on frontal walls. In the two middle displays, line orientations were judged relative to implicit planar axes on a textured vertical surface (side wall) viewed to the left of the observer at a 30° observation angle and on a textured horizontal surface (ground plane) viewed downward at a 30° angle. Orientation estimates were made either with respect to the depth-aligned axis (horizontal on the wall plane; "vertical" on the ground plane) or the frontal axis (vertical on the wall plane, "horizontal" on the ground plane). Once depth compression (factor of 0.73) was taken into account, orientation estimates in both planes showed asymmetric patterns of bias with exaggerated deviations from horizontal axes. In other words, the perceptual orientation bias exists with respect to post-constancy representations of surface orientation. Note that the asymmetrical spatial orientation bias depended on the horizontal/vertical axes of the respective planes rather than the reference axis defined as zero. As in the body-tilt paradigm, the results indicate that the bias is not in the retinotopic coding of orientation, but at a later, post-constancy, processing stage in which orientation is coded in extrinsic coordinates imposed by the visual system. Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2013

A role of rectangularity in perceiving a 3D shape of an object

Boundary Cues for 3D Object Shape Recovery

Perceptual Bias in 2D Orientation is Also Present in Obliquely-Viewed Planes

Visual Complexity of Shapes: a Hierarchical Perceptual Learning Model

Depth Compression Based on Mis-Scaling of Binocular Disparity May Contribute to Angular Expansion in Perceived Optical Slant.

Perceived slant of binocularly viewed large-scale surfaces: a common model from explicit and implicit measures.

The Perception of 2D Orientation is Categorically Biased

Can Spatial Biases Be Eliminated Through Learning?

Slant Perception in Near Space is Categorically Biased: Evidence for a Vertical Tendency

Perceived Aspect Ratio on Tilted Surfaces Supports the Hypothesis That Perceived Slant Approximates a Scaled Sine Function of Actual Slant

Perceptual biases in the interpretation of 3D shape from shading

3D Shape Perception Integrates Intuitive Physics and Analysis-by-Synthesis

Monocular reconstruction of shapes of natural objects from orthographic and perspective images

Complexity of mental geometry for 3D pose perception

Qualitative perception of 3D shape from patterns of luminance curvature

How small changes to one eye's retinal image can transform the perceived shape of a very familiar object

Use and Misuse of Linear Perspective in the Perceptual Reconstruction of 3-D Perspective View Displays

Perception of shape and space across rigid transformations

A crescent edge-length illusion induced by object-based perception

Backward and forward neck tilt affects perceptual bias when interpreting ambiguous figures

Oblique warping: A general distortion of spatial perception