Abstract:Background A valid and efficient stress measure is important for clinical and community settings. The objectives of this study were to translate the English version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire (PSQ) into Chinese and to assess the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the PSQ (C-PSQ). The C-PSQ evaluates subjective experiences of stress instead of a specific and objective status. Methods Forward translations and back translations were used to translate the PSQ into Chinese. We used the C-PSQ to survey 2798 medical students and workers at three study sites in China from 2015 to 2017. Applying Rasch analysis (RA) and factor analysis (FA), we examined the measurement properties of the C-PSQ. Data were analyzed using the Rasch model for item fit, local dependence (LD), differential item functioning (DIF), unidimensionality, separation and reliability, response forms and person-item map. We first optimized the item selection in the Chinese version to maximize its psychometric quality. Second, we used cross-validation, by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), to determine the best fitting model in comparison to the different variants. Measurement invariance (MI) was tested using multi-group CFA across subgroups (medical students vs. medical workers). We evaluated validity of the C-PSQ using the criterion instruments, such as the Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), the Short Form-8 Health Survey (SF-8) and the Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GADS). Reliability was assessed using internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha, Guttman’s lambda-2, and McDonald’s omegas) and reproducibility (test–retest correlation and intraclass correlation coefficient, [ICC]). Results Infit and/or outfit values indicated that all items fitted the Rasch model. Three item pairs presented local dependency (residual correlations > 0.30). Ten items showed DIF. Dimensionality instruction suggested that eight items should be deleted. One item showed low discrimination. Thirteen items from the original PSQ were retained in the C-PSQ adaptation (i.e. C-PSQ-13). We tested and verified four feasible models to perform EFA. Built on the EFA models, the optimal CFA model included two first-order factors (i.e. constraint and imbalance) and a second-order factor (i.e., perceived stress). The first-order model had acceptable goodness of fit (Normed Chi-square = 8.489, TLI = 0.957, CFI = 0.965, WRMR = 1.637, RMSEA [90% CI] = 0.078 [0.072, 0.084]). The second-order model showed identical model fit. Person separation index (PSI) and person reliability (PR) were 2.42 and 0.85, respectively. Response forms were adequate, item difficulty matched respondents’ ability levels, and unidimensionality was found in the two factors. Multi-group CFA showed validity of the optimal model. Concurrent validity of the C-PSQ-13 was 0.777, − 0.595 and 0.584 (Spearman correlation, P < 0.001, the same hereinafter) for the Chinese version of the PSS-10, SF-8, and GADS. For reliability analyses, internal consistency of the C-PSQ-13 was 0.878 (Cronbach’s alpha), 0.880 (Guttman’s lambda-2), and 0.880 (McDonald’s omegas); test–retest correlation and ICC were 0.782 and 0.805 in a 2-day interval, respectively. Conclusion The C-PSQ-13 shows good metric characteristics for most indicators, which could contribute to stress research given its validity and economy. This study also contributes to the evidence based regarding between-group factorial structure analysis.

Korean versions of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14, 10 and 4): psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic disease.

Construct validity of the perceived stress scale (PSS-10) in a sample of early childhood teacher candidates

Validation of the Korean version of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale in patients with chronic non-cancer pain

Psychometric properties of the perceived stress scale in a community sample of Chinese

Psychometric Testing of the Korean Version of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory Version 3

Psychometric Analysis of the Obsessive–Compulsive Spectrum Self-Report and Social Anxiety Spectrum Self-Report in the Korean Population

The Chinese Version of the Perceived Stress Questionnaire: Development and Validation Amongst Medical Students and Workers

Psychometric Testing of the Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale–Korean Version (CDSES-K)

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Perceived Stress Scale

Psychometric Testing of the Chinese Version of the Coping and Adaptation Processing Scale-Short Form in Adults with Chronic Illness

A psychometric evaluation of the Swedish translation of the Perceived Stress Scale: a Rasch analysis

Psychometric comparison of single-item, short, and comprehensive depression screening measures in Korean young adults

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of the Somatic Symptom Disorder-B Criteria Scale in a Clinical Population

Measuring Psychological Strains: A Psychometric Study to Develop a Shortened Version of the Psychological Strain Scales

Psychometric properties and correlates of Chinese version of Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS-10) in people with common mental disorders with different employment Statuses

Assessing procrastination in Korean: A study of the translation and validation of the Pure Procrastination Scale and a reexamination of the Irrational Procrastination Scale in a student and community sample

Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Swedish version of the Perceived Stress Scale

Three Versions of the Perceived Stress Scale: Psychometric Evaluation in a Nationally Representative Sample of Chinese Adults during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Chinese version of the Perceived Stress Scale-10: A psychometric study in Chinese university students

Using Contemporary Psychometric Methods to Construct and Validate Scores on a Short-Form Version of the Psychological Strain Scales.

Preliminary Validation Study of the Korean Version of the DSM-5 Level 2 Cross-Cutting Symptom Measure: Depression and Irritability for Parents of Children Aged 6-17 Years