Dissecting etiologies of posterior circulation stroke

Catherine Amlie-Lefond

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12969

2016-01-01

Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology

Abstract:Cerebral arteriopathy has been increasingly recognized as a risk factor for initial and recurrent stroke in childhood. Up to 20% of childhood arterial ischaemic stroke (AIS) is due to cervicocephalic arterial dissection (CCAD). Establishing the presence of dissection is critical, as CCAD is associated with a significant risk of recurrent stroke, which can be decreased with antithrombotic therapy. Diagnosis of vertebral artery dissection (VAD) is particularly challenging in childhood, as head and neck pain is not prominent, and symptoms of posterior circulation stroke such as vomiting and dizziness are common and nonspecific childhood complaints. Head computed tomography, often the initial imaging study in the child presenting with acute neurological symptoms, is particularly insensitive for posterior circulation ischaemia. McCrea et al. highlight the importance of VAD in posterior circulation stroke in childhood, finding VAD in half of 30 cases in a retrospective analysis in which VAD was confirmed on central review of neurovascular imaging. This study is consistent with earlier work which reported VAD in 10 of 22 children with posterior circulation stroke. Given the greater sensitivity of cerebral catheter angiography (CCA) for luminal abnormalities over other imaging modalities in diagnosing VAD, the authors strongly recommend endoluminal imaging with CCA in suspected VAD unless a definitive diagnosis can be made noninvasively. Increasingly, the diagnosis of arterial dissection is being made on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and angiography, particularly with the recent use of stronger magnets, dedicated vessel wall imaging, and susceptibilityweighted imaging. Optimal MRI should include the head and neck extending to the aortic arch, and include T1weighted fat saturation or proton density sequences to allow for visualization of intramural hematomas in a false lumen. Narrowing of the true lumen, analogous to that demonstrated on catheter angiogram, is usually detectable on magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), although subtle dissections may be missed particularly in areas of where there is turbulent flow. Suboptimal technique and interpretation can result in failure of MRI and MRA to detect CCAD in childhood. The finding by McCrea et al. that VAD accounts for half of posterior circulation strokes in childhood has two important implications: one for clinical management and the other for research. Vertebral artery dissection can be missed on initial vascular imaging, including MRA and magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging and rarely even CCA, only to be detected on follow-up imaging. If a child presents with multiple acute and subacute posterior circulation strokes, or early recurrence of posterior circulation stroke, this paper confirms that VAD is the most likely diagnosis. Therefore, in children in whom VAD is strongly suspected, treatment for presumed dissection should be considered prior to or even in the absence of imaging confirmation. This includes not only antithrombotic treatment, but also monitoring for development of aneurysm or other vascular abnormalities, and counseling regarding risk of recurrent dissection as well as avoidance of potential triggering events. In adults, CCAD is treated with antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulant therapy, with aspirin often used as a first-line therapy. In contrast, anticoagulation for 3 to 6 months is recommended in childhood CCAD, based on expert