Abstract:Question Besides race, how do other social determinants of health and related factors affect the receipt of diabetic eye care and whether it is in accordance with established clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)? Findings This cohort study found that among 37 397 patients with diabetes, factors such as health insurance type, residence urbanicity, diabetes type, and diabetic retinopathy, among others, were associated with receiving eye care in accordance with CPGs. Meaning Multiple factors were associated with the extent by which these patients receive eye care in accordance with CPGs, highlighting importance of implementing targeted interventions to improve outcomes for certain high-risk groups. Importance Besides race, little is known about how other social determinants of health (SDOH) affect quality of diabetic eye care. Objective To evaluate the association between multiple SDOH and monitoring for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in accordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was conducted in 11 US medical centers and included adult patients (18-75 years old) with diabetes. Patients received care from 2012 to 2023 and had 18 months or more of follow-up. Exposures Multiple SDOH and associated factors, including ethnicity, urbanicity of residence, health insurance type, and diabetes type. Main Outcomes and Measures Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of receiving 1 or more eye-care visits and 1 or more dilated fundus examinations in accordance with CPGs. Results The study cohort included 37 397 adults with diabetes: 10 157 Black patients and 27 240 White patients. The mean (SD) age was 58 (11) years for Black patients and 59 (11) years for White patients. Of the Black patients, 6422 (63.2%) were female and 3735 (36.8%) male; of the White patients, 13 120 (48.1) were female and 14 120 (51.8) were male. Compared with those of the same race in urban communities, Black patients (aOR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.31) and White patients (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) with diabetes living in rural communities had 88% and 25% lower odds of having eye-care visits, respectively. Sicker Black and White patients, defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index, had 4% (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) and 5% (aOR, 1.05, CI 1.04-1.06) higher odds of having an eye-care visit, respectively. Black patients with preexisting DR had 15% lower odds of visits (aOR, 0.85, CI 0.73-0.99) compared with those without preexisting DR while White patients with preexisting DR had 16% higher odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28). White patients with Medicare (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and Medicaid (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) had lower odds of eye-care visits vs patients with commercial health insurance. Hispanic White patients had 15% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98) vs non-Hispanic White patients. White patients with type 1 diabetes had 17% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) vs those with type 2 diabetes. Among patients who had eye-care visits, those with preexisting DR (Black: aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11-2.53; White: aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96) were more likely to undergo dilated fundus examinations. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that certain SDOH affected monitoring for DR similarly for Black and White patients with diabetes while others affected them differently. Patients living in rural communities, Black patients with preexisting DR, and Hispanic White patients were not receiving eye care in accordance with CPGs, which may contribute to worse outcomes.

Eye Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers

Telemedicine Screening for Eye Disorders in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Relationship to Vision-Targeted Health-Related Quality of Life

Low rates of eye care utilization among visually impaired subsidized senior housing residents

National and State-Level Trends in Mental Health and Substance Use Disorder Services at Federally Qualified Health Centers, 2012-2019

Patient Accessibility to Eye Care in the United States

Patient-centered medical homes and vision care for children: a cross-sectional analysis with data from the national survey of children's health 2018–2019

340B Participation and Safety Net Engagement Among Federally Qualified Health Centers

Care Quality and Equity in Health Centers During and After the COVID-19 Pandemic

A Screening Strategy to Mitigate Vision Impairment by Engaging Adults Who Underuse Eye Care Services

Risk factors affecting the utilization of eye care services evaluated by the CDC's behavior risk factor surveillance system from 2018 to 2021

The Relationship between Unstable Housing, Food Insecurity and Vision Status in the MI-SIGHT Community Eye Disease Screening Program

Amblyopia Care Trends Following Widespread Photoscreener Adoption

Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Eye Care Utilization among Medicare Beneficiaries with Glaucoma

Race, Social Determinants of Health, and Diabetic Eye Care Quality

Capabilities and Limitations of Student-Led Free Vision Screening Programs in the United States

Safety Net Primary Care Capabilities After the COVID-19 Pandemic

Neighborhood Poverty and Clinic Attendance in the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine Program

Underserved groups could be better considered within population-based eye health surveys: a methodological study

Eye and Visual Health in New England: Findings from the Healthy Aging Data Reports

Race, Social Determinants of Health, and the Quality of Diabetic Eye Care

Racial Disparities in Glaucoma Vision Outcomes and Eye Care Utilization: An IRIS Registry Analysis