Abstract:Question Besides race, how do other social determinants of health and related factors affect the receipt of diabetic eye care and whether it is in accordance with established clinical practice guidelines (CPGs)? Findings This cohort study found that among 37 397 patients with diabetes, factors such as health insurance type, residence urbanicity, diabetes type, and diabetic retinopathy, among others, were associated with receiving eye care in accordance with CPGs. Meaning Multiple factors were associated with the extent by which these patients receive eye care in accordance with CPGs, highlighting importance of implementing targeted interventions to improve outcomes for certain high-risk groups. Importance Besides race, little is known about how other social determinants of health (SDOH) affect quality of diabetic eye care. Objective To evaluate the association between multiple SDOH and monitoring for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in accordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study was conducted in 11 US medical centers and included adult patients (18-75 years old) with diabetes. Patients received care from 2012 to 2023 and had 18 months or more of follow-up. Exposures Multiple SDOH and associated factors, including ethnicity, urbanicity of residence, health insurance type, and diabetes type. Main Outcomes and Measures Adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of receiving 1 or more eye-care visits and 1 or more dilated fundus examinations in accordance with CPGs. Results The study cohort included 37 397 adults with diabetes: 10 157 Black patients and 27 240 White patients. The mean (SD) age was 58 (11) years for Black patients and 59 (11) years for White patients. Of the Black patients, 6422 (63.2%) were female and 3735 (36.8%) male; of the White patients, 13 120 (48.1) were female and 14 120 (51.8) were male. Compared with those of the same race in urban communities, Black patients (aOR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.31) and White patients (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.91) with diabetes living in rural communities had 88% and 25% lower odds of having eye-care visits, respectively. Sicker Black and White patients, defined by the Charlson Comorbidity Index, had 4% (aOR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06) and 5% (aOR, 1.05, CI 1.04-1.06) higher odds of having an eye-care visit, respectively. Black patients with preexisting DR had 15% lower odds of visits (aOR, 0.85, CI 0.73-0.99) compared with those without preexisting DR while White patients with preexisting DR had 16% higher odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.28). White patients with Medicare (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.80-0.91) and Medicaid (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96) had lower odds of eye-care visits vs patients with commercial health insurance. Hispanic White patients had 15% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.74-0.98) vs non-Hispanic White patients. White patients with type 1 diabetes had 17% lower odds of eye-care visits (aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.90) vs those with type 2 diabetes. Among patients who had eye-care visits, those with preexisting DR (Black: aOR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.11-2.53; White: aOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.16-1.96) were more likely to undergo dilated fundus examinations. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that certain SDOH affected monitoring for DR similarly for Black and White patients with diabetes while others affected them differently. Patients living in rural communities, Black patients with preexisting DR, and Hispanic White patients were not receiving eye care in accordance with CPGs, which may contribute to worse outcomes.

Neighborhood Poverty and Clinic Attendance in the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine Program

Social Deprivation and the Risk of Screening Positive for Glaucoma in the MI-SIGHT Telemedicine Based Glaucoma Detection Program

A Screening Strategy to Mitigate Vision Impairment by Engaging Adults Who Underuse Eye Care Services

The Relationship between Unstable Housing, Food Insecurity and Vision Status in the MI-SIGHT Community Eye Disease Screening Program

1344-P: Socioeconomic Status Patterns in Remote Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Using Teleophthalmology

Bringing Eye Care to the People

Neighborhood Deprivation and Adherence to Initial Diabetic Retinopathy Screening

Association of Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage with Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Implications of Neighborhood- and Patient-Level Factors for Eye Care

Outcomes and Revenue Generation of a Community-based Screening at a Center in the United States: The SToP Glaucoma Program

Race, Social Determinants of Health, and the Quality of Diabetic Eye Care

Factors Influencing Eye Screening Adherence Among Latinx Patients With Diabetes: A Qualitative Study

Racial and Socioeconomic Differences in Eye Care Utilization among Medicare Beneficiaries with Glaucoma

Race, Social Determinants of Health, and Diabetic Eye Care Quality

Association between sociodemographic factors and self-reported glaucoma in the National Health Interview Survey: a population-based analysis

Telemedicine Screening for Eye Disorders in Federally Qualified Health Centers: Relationship to Vision-Targeted Health-Related Quality of Life

Effect of neighborhood and individual-level socioeconomic factors on breast cancer screening adherence in a multi-ethnic study

Social Risk Factor Associations With Presenting Visual Acuity in Patients With Microbial Keratitis

Evaluation and Optimization of Diabetic Retinopathy Screenings for Uninsured Latinx Patients in a Resource-Limited Student-Run Free Clinic

Manhattan Vision Screening and Follow-up Study (NYC-SIGHT): Vision and refractive error results

Socioeconomic Determinants in Diabetic Retinopathy Screening