Prinzipien der intramedullären Knochenbruchstabilisierung Teil 1

C. Krettek

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130170095

2001-07-01

Der Unfallchirurg

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Can government subsidy strategies and strategy combinations effectively stimulate enterprise innovation? Theory and evidence

Wanshu Wu,Kai Zhao,Lei Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00230-y

2021-05-04

Economia Politica

Abstract:This paper tries to disentangle between the effects of non-R&D and R&D subsidies, and explores the mechanism of different subsidies and their combination on R&D investment and innovation output of listed enterprises in China by combining theory with empirical research. Based on the unbalanced panel data of 2707 Chinese listed enterprises from the year 2008 to 2015, this study confirms that both R&D subsidy and non-R&D subsidy have an incentive effect on the R&D investment, but the former is more effective than the latter. When R&D subsidy is at a high level, there is a positive relation between government non-R&D subsidies and enterprise R&D investment; sufficient non-R&D subsidies can effectively strengthen the incentive effect of R&D subsidies on R&D investment of enterprises. Furthermore, R&D subsidy can promote the innovation output of enterprises through direct and indirect paths, whereas, non-R&D subsidy or subsidy policy-mix has a certain "masking effect" on the innovation output.

economics
Research on the Promotion Effect of Government Subsidies on Innovation of High-Tech Enterprises

Wu Xucheng,Chen Shiyi,Li Shihan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0257-0289.2023.02.012

2023-01-01

Abstract:As an essential component of industrial policy, government subsidies are frequently utilized to encourage R＆D innovation in high-tech companies. There is currently no unanimity regarding the impact of government subsidies on the innovation output of businesses. This paper empirically investigates the incentive effect of government subsidies on innovation output, using the data from Zhangjiang National Innovation Demonstration Zone, which is the main vehicle for Shanghai’s science and technology innovation center construction. We show that government subsidies significantly increase the R＆D innovation output of high-tech enterprises in general. We also prove that government subsidies would promote the R＆D innovation output of small-scale enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises more considerably. Besides, the promotion of government subsidies on innovation output may result from three mechanisms: increasing investment in science and technology, upgrading the investment in science and technology talents, and absorbing innovative external technologies.
Do government subsidies promote enterprise innovation?——Evidence from Chinese listed companies

KaiChao Shao,Xiaohua Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100436

IF: 11.219

2023-10-01

Journal of Innovation & Knowledge

Abstract:The original intention of the government was to provide financial subsidies to firms by implementing innovation support policies. In turn, this will encourage these firms to carry out technological innovation activities. However, there are still differing views in the academic community on whether government subsidies have a stimulating effect or a crowding-out effect on enterprise innovation. The theoretical and empirical research conclusions are uncertain. In this study, samples unlisted companies in the Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share markets in China from 2012 to 2020. The entrepreneurial spirit is the entry point to empirically testing the impact of government subsidies on enterprise innovation under financial constraints. The research results show how government subsidies have a significant stimulating impact on enterprise technological innovation activities. More subsidies don't necessarily mean better results because research shows an inverted U-shape. Entrepreneurial spirit plays a significant moderating role in transmitting and optimizing the driving effect of government subsidies. Further heterogeneity analysis shows that government subsidies and entrepreneurial spirit have different driving and moderating effects on the innovation of enterprises with differing natures and scales depending on the region. From a regional perspective, eastern enterprises are better suited in optimizing government subsidies to stimulate enterprise innovation. From the perspective of enterprise nature, private enterprises are more motivated and better able to optimize government subsidies than state-owned enterprises. Regarding enterprise scale, small and medium-sized enterprises can more efficiently optimize government subsidies to stimulate enterprise innovation than large enterprises. The contribution of this paper is to expand the understanding of the impact of government subsidies on enterprise innovation activities.

management,business
The Stimulating Effects of R&D Subsidies on Independent Innovation of Chinese Enterprises

An Tongliang,Zhou Shaodong,Pi Jiancai

2009-01-01

Abstract:In those catching-up countries,exemplified by China,who are running after developed countries in terms of technology,governments always consider R&D subsidies as a critical measure to stimulate enterprises to carry out independent innovation.However,enterprises in reality often send out false innovation type signals so as to attain government subsidy.This paper builds up a dynamic and asymmetric information game model between enterprises and policy makers,with an attempt to depict enterprises' strategies to acquire R&D subsidy and to analyze the subsidy's stimulation effect.It indicates that the primary innovation subsidy would exert a "negative" stimulating effect if enterprises and government share asymmetric information,and meanwhile the special human capital for primary innovation is excessively cheap.Faced with the problems of false signals sent by enterprises,as well as the exorbitant distinguish cost,the best subsidies scheme for government is to achieve the separating equilibrium through increasing the special human capital price.The conclusion provides predictable methods to distinguish enterprises' real innovation types,and feasible policy suggestion to enhance government R&D subsidies efficiency.
How innovation funding leads enterprises to engage in research and development: Small and medium enterprises' perspective

Hui Sun,Xiaocong Yang,Xuan Tang,Fei Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0289166

IF: 3.7

2023-07-25

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Technology-based small and medium enterprises (SMEs) are the driving force behind China's economic and technological development. However, these enterprises often face challenges in financing their research and development (R&D) activities due to limited financing opportunities. Previous research has primarily focused on the resource attributes of government innovation subsidies, which serve as a crucial funding source for these SMEs. This paper aims to explore the impact of government innovation subsidies on firms from a novel perspective, considering the signaling characteristics of these subsidies. The theoretical foundation of this study lies in the asymmetric information theory and the signaling mechanism through which government subsidies send signals about enterprises. The study uses enterprise data from 2012 to 2019 to investigate the effect of government subsidies on the R&D investment of enterprises listed on the SMEs Board in Chinese stock market. The results reveal a significantly positive effect of government subsidies on the R&D investment of SME Board-listed enterprises and verify the mediating role of financing constraints in this effect. The extent to which government subsidies influence the R&D investment of SME Board-listed enterprises is associated with the enterprises' ownership characteristics, debt ratios, and times interest earned ratios. This study contributes to the literature on the SMEs Board market and may provide the Chinese government insights into developing industry policies that maximize the effectiveness of government subsidies.
An Empirical Study on Optimal Strategies of Industry-University-Institute Green Innovation with Subsidy

Wenqing Wu,Kexin Yu,Saixiang Ma,Chien-Chi Chu,Shijie Li,Chengcheng Ma,Sang-Bing Tsai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051667

IF: 3.9

2018-05-21

Sustainability

Abstract:With the increasing awareness of environmental protection and the complexity and rapid change of technological innovation, more and more enterprises seek to develop and research (R&D) institutions to cooperate with green innovation. In order to promote the cooperation efficiency of green innovation, this paper develops a multi-stage game model to analyze the optimal strategies of the enterprise, the university and the policy-maker with consumer learning and government subsidy. Then the paper compares the difference of optimal subsidy between the single-stage green innovation cooperation and the multi-stage green innovation cooperation. The research shows that consumers’ initial learning factors and green innovation cooperation cycle have a significant impact on the optimal input level of the enterprise and the university and also have a significant impact on the optimal subsidy of the government. The specific government subsidy and subsidy ratio depend on the comprehensive role of consumer learning factors and the green innovation cooperation cycle. In the end, we propose that the government should subsidize the university at times when the initial consumer learning factor is low; the government subsidy should be properly lagged when the initial consumer learning factor is high.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
The Effect of Government Subsidies on Firm R&D Investment in China: From Perspectives of Ownership and Market Power

Haijing Wang,Junguo Shi,Muhammad Imran,Jiaqi Gao,Yitian Zhang,Rongyu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4905287

IF: 2.3

2022-08-27

Complexity

Abstract:This study examines the effects of government innovation subsidies under different combinations of market power (i.e., the relationship between enterprises, upstream suppliers, and downstream customers) and different types of ownership from the perspective of the contemporary marketing microenvironment. Based on the panel data of listed Chinese manufacturing companies from 2009 to 2018, the empirical results show that, in the case of higher buyer power, government subsidies will significantly promote the R&D investment of enterprises and the positive effect is not affected by nature of the enterprise's ownership. In the case of lower buyer power and seller power, government subsidies significantly promote the R&D investment of nonstate-owned enterprises, but have no effect on state-owned enterprises. The conclusions of the study further verify that, under different combinations of market power, there are significant differences in the effects of innovation subsidies for enterprises with different forms of ownership, and these provide a theoretical point of reference for the government to implement innovation subsidies. This study not only fills the theoretical black box of the relationship between government subsidies and enterprise innovation but also provides relatively new empirical evidence for the related research on innovation subsidies in developing countries.

mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,multidisciplinary sciences
The Influence of Government Subsidies on Enterprise Innovation Performance

Wang Lan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127503006

2021-01-01

E3S Web of Conferences

Abstract:In the current society of innovative development, the innovation and reform of enterprises is particularly important in the development of the entire industry, especially with the country’s vigorous support for innovation and entrepreneurship in recent years. The rise of enterprises in the market is like mushrooms, and the development of enterprises will usher in a new challenge and opportunity, in order to be able to occupy a certain position among many enterprises and obtain greater advantages. Enterprises must constantly adjust their development strategies based on social reforms. However, the government subsidies to enterprises are one of the important starting points for China to realize the industrial policy, and they have played an important role in supporting and developing China’s relatively weak and strategic industries. In the development of enterprises, the influence of government subsidies on the development of enterprises should not be ignored. For this reason, further exploration of the impact of government subsidies on the development of enterprise innovation performance has become an issue that governments and enterprises need to study and pay attention to. This article will further briefly introduce the impact of government subsidies on enterprise innovation performance.
Government subsidy design: knowledge transfer in R&D networks considering risk attitudes and reputation effects

Xiaoxia Huang,Peng Guo,Victor Shi,Xiaonan Wang,Xiaoxia HuangPeng GuoVictor ShiXiaonan Wanga School of Management,Northwestern Polytechnical University,Xi'an,People's Republic of Chinab Lazaridis School of Business and Economics,Wilfrid Laurier University,Waterloo,Canada

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03081079.2024.2311910

2024-02-02

International Journal of General Systems

Abstract:The design of government subsidies is essential in supporting collaborative innovation and promoting sustainable development in R&D networks. This study explores the influence of different government subsidy strategies designed for R&D networks on inter-enterprise knowledge transfer. Drawing upon evolutionary game theory, it examines how impact is contingent upon enterprises' risk attitudes and reputation effects. The results indicate that when enterprises exhibit homogeneous risk attitudes, government subsidy policies encouraging risk-seeking behaviors can effectively enhance the knowledge-transferring level. When enterprises possess heterogeneous risk attitudes, a greater diversity of risk attitudes leads to a more conducive environment for knowledge transfer. Incorporating a rigorous reputation tolerance into the design of government subsidies in R&D networks can effectively elevate knowledge transfer. Therefore, policymakers can design tailored government subsidies and incentive mechanisms grounded in enterprises' risk attitudes and reputation effects. This study provides theoretical and policy implications for designing government subsidies and collaboration in R&D networks.

computer science, theory & methods
The Impact of Government Subsidies on Technological Innovation in Agribusiness: The Case for China

Liping Wu,Kai Hu,Oleksii Lyulyov,Tetyana Pimonenko,Ishfaq Hamid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su142114003

IF: 3.9

2022-10-28

Sustainability

Abstract:With the implementation of the rural revitalization strategy and the promotion of agricultural and rural modernization, the subsidies enjoyed by agricultural enterprises in China are increasing. As a result, the effectiveness of government subsidies for the technological innovation of agricultural enterprises has attracted more and more attention. Based on the perspectives of the whole industry chain of agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, fisheries, and of processing, manufacturing, circulation, and service, this paper takes the listed agricultural companies from 2007 to 2019 as a research sample and empirically tests the effects and mechanisms of government subsidies on the technological innovation of agricultural enterprises. The study applies the fixed effect and intermediary effect models. The findings show that government subsidies potentially encourage agricultural enterprises to grow more successfully. Moreover, R&D expenditure is essential for enterprise technological innovation and leads to an intermediate impact. At the same time, government subsidies for the technological innovation of agricultural enterprises have a certain heterogeneity between different industries, state-owned enterprises and non-state-owned enterprises, and large enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises. Therefore, this study argues that the government should continue to raise subsidies. In addition, the subsidies should be "different from enterprise to enterprise", and government subsidy funds should be better supervised to foster agricultural technological innovation properly.

environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
Why do Chinese enterprises make imitative innovation?—An empirical explanation based on government subsidies

Feifei Song,Changheng Zhao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.802703

IF: 3.8

2022-09-12

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:The previous literature analyzed the widespread imitative innovation of Chinese enterprises from various perspectives, including enterprises' rational choice of cost-gain, property rights system, human capital and policy environment. However, this paper provides a brand-new perspective on government subsidies for the reasons behind the imitative innovation of enterprises. According to the statistics from Chinese enterprise-labor matching, we found that government subsidies stimulated enterprises to make "imitative innovation" through patent purchase rather than independent R&D. Government subsidies were used for low-risk "imitative innovation" because of enterprises' rent-seeking behavior, low R&D ability and the review of government subsidy projects. Based on the above conclusions, this paper suggests that the government should reduce or withdraw its intervention in enterprise innovation and implement the post-subsidy and post-evaluation mechanism for government-subsidized programs.

psychology, multidisciplinary
R&D subsidies, executive background and innovation of Chinese listed companies

Xiuwu Zhang,Lixiang Wang,Feng Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1792324

2020-09-09

Abstract:Enterprises are the mainstay of national innovation. The improvement of enterprise productivity and the sustained and rapid development of the economy are inseparable from the research and development (R&D) and innovation of enterprises. Most previous research studies have focused on the economic system and scale of enterprises to study the impact of government–enterprise relations on corporate innovation. This article takes the heterogeneity background characteristics of executives as the starting point, discusses the internal mechanism of R&D subsidies, the background characteristics of corporate executives and the innovative behaviour of Chinese listed companies, and draws two conclusions: (1) The current Chinese government's innovation subsidy allocation process still has some preferences, such as the company's executives have more R&D subsidies for listed companies with a background in government, technical background and high academic background; and (2) Although the three types of background characteristics of executives are beneficial to the company's R&D subsidies, the government background of executives has not significantly promoted the innovation of listed companies, while the background of technology R&D and high academic background of executives have significantly promoted corporate innovation.
Do government subsidies improve innovation investment for new energy firms: A quasi-natural experiment of China's listed companies

Zhanchi Wu,Xiangjun Fan,Bangzhu Zhu,Jiahui Xia,Lin Zhang,Ping Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121418

IF: 12

2022-02-01

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Abstract:This paper applies the fixed effects and the difference-in-differences models to explore the impact of government subsidies on the innovation investment of new energy firms by the financial information of China's listed companies from 2007 to 2017. The empirical results demonstrate that the subsidy scale of new energy enterprises has an inverted U-shaped relationship with enterprise innovation investment. The higher subsidy level has a crowding out effect on the research and development (R&D) investment of enterprises, which is largely attributable to the managerial myopia of enterprises. We further confirm the existence of the crowding out effect by exploring the quasi-natural experiment of China's new energy vehicle subsidy adjustment policy in 2016. We find that reducing subsidies is associated with a significant increase in R&D investment. This study reveals the optimal choice of government intervention.

business,regional & urban planning
Government Subsidies and Firm Technological Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data of High-tech Firms

Kun Xie,Zhengluan Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202127503070

2021-01-01

E3S Web of Conferences

Abstract:Can government subsidies improve enterprises’ technological innovation performance? Based on the A-share high-tech listed enterprises in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchange from 2015 to 2019, this paper empirically tests the micro policy effect of government subsidies on innovation performance of enterprises under the background of economic transformation, and the moderating effect of regional corruption, market competition and enterprise ownership concentration on this effect. The results show that the high quality signal transmitted by government subsidies is helpful for innovative enterprises to broaden the source of innovation resources and encourage enterprises to actively carry out innovative activities. Moderate level of regional corruption will promote the government subsidy effect, too high or too low level of corruption is not conducive to enterprise innovation; The higher the degree of market competition, the weaker the promoting effect of government subsidies on enterprise innovation; Corporate ownership concentration has a U-shaped moderating effect on government subsidies and innovation performance. Therefore, to improve the independent innovation ability of enterprises, on the one hand, we should continue to strengthen the government innovation subsidy and improve the subsidy system; on the other hand, we should strictly crackdown on corruption activities and supervise the establishment and improvement of the internal control system of enterprises, so as to give full play to the effect of government subsidies.

English Else
Does internationalization encourage state-owned enterprises to utilize subsidies to innovate? Evidence from high-tech and automobile manufacturing industries of Chinese listed companies

Yu Xie,Francis Boadu,Hongjuan Tang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/cms-06-2021-0250

IF: 2.351

2022-01-11

Chinese Management Studies

Abstract:Purpose Drawing on the resource-based view, institutional logic and isomorphic pressure theories, this study constructed a theoretical model to explore the correlations between government subsidies and innovation performance. Particularly, this study aims to investigate the moderating effects of ownership types and degree of internationalization on these relationships. Design/methodology/approach To empirically test the relationships, the authors use panel data from high-tech manufacturing and automobile manufacturing industries in Chinese A stock listed companies for the period 2011–2015 and performed regression analysis. Findings Results indicate that government subsidies positively enhance enterprises’ innovation performance; there is a big gap between government subsidies’ incentive effect on innovation performance between state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and private-owned enterprises (POEs); with the improvement of internationalization, the promotion effect of government subsidies on enterprise innovation performance is strengthened; there is a three-way interaction between government subsidies, degree of internationalization and ownership types, such that in the presence of a low degree of internationalization, there is a big gap in the incentive effect of government subsidies on the innovation performance of SOEs and POEs; in the presence of a high degree of internationalization, the gap is significantly reduced. Originality/value This is an empirical study on the impact mechanism of ownership types and internationalization on the relationship between government subsidies and innovation performance in China. It provides valuable insights to show how internationalization can dramatically improve SOEs’ efficiency disadvantages in the allocation of government subsidies to innovation activities.

management
Government Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China's Photovoltaic Industry

Cailou Jiang,Dehai Liu,Qin Zhu,Lu Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5548809

IF: 1.4

2021-06-22

Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society

Abstract:Government subsidies (GSs) have triggered a remarkable increase in the production capacity of photovoltaic (PV) electricity in China. However, the lack of core technologies has limited PV enterprises’ competitiveness in the global market. This research investigates the impacts of R&D subsidies and non-R&D subsidies on the innovation in PV enterprises. With samples of Chinese listed PV enterprises from 2010 to 2019, this study finds R&D subsidies exert a notable positive impact on the innovation in PV enterprises. In small and medium enterprises (SMEs) and enterprises without state-owned shares, both R&D subsidies and non-R&D subsidies have positive impacts on the innovation. Considering the policy orientation, R&D subsidies granted under demand-orientation policies promote the innovation in PV enterprises. The government should increase the amount of R&D subsidies, optimize the R&D subsidies’ evaluation mechanism, and reasonably grant R&D subsidies from the demand side.

mathematics, interdisciplinary applications,multidisciplinary sciences
The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective

Mingting Kou,Yuanqi Yang,Kaihua Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.01.016

IF: 4.7

2020-11-01

Economic Modelling

Abstract:<p>This paper sheds light on the effects of two different types of R&D financing sources respectively from a supply-demand combined perspective, namely subsidy from government and venture capital in market, on the innovation process. Our empirical analysis is based on a unique data set of industrial enterprises located in Beijing ZhongGuanCun Science Park during the period 2008–2015. In terms of the two stages of the innovation process, this paper untangles and compares the effects of the two financing sources on R&D input, patent output as well as profit outcome. We find that both supply- and demand-side external R&D financing channels have differential effects on the innovation process in terms of input, output or outcome as well as the different-sized enterprises. Supply-side subsidy tends to be more effective at the front end of the innovation process, while venture capital shows a demand-side consideration on technology evolution by focusing more on the back end of the innovation process. Both government subsidy and venture capital can have a significantly positive impact on the entire innovation process of small and micro enterprises, whereas for large and medium-sized enterprises, subsidies have no significant impact on profit outcome and venture capital can only affect patents positively. These findings suggest that the Chinese government should focus more on small and micro firms and increase such firms' access to venture capital through a process of certification, so as to achieve an effective combination of government functions and market functions.</p>

economics
Academia-industry collaboration, government funding and innovation efficiency in Chinese industrial enterprises

Bojun Hou,Jin Hong,Hongying Wang,Chongyang Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2018.1543868

2018-11-13

Technology Analysis and Strategic Management

Abstract:This article uses a stochastic frontier model to elaborate how academia-industry research and development collaboration and government funding influence the innovation efficiency of industrial enterprises through a panel dataset from 2009 to 2015, including 30 provinces in China. We find that the research institute-industry collaboration promotes innovation efficiency of enterprises, while university-industry collaboration is adversely associated with innovation efficiency. Government funding plays a positive role on innovation efficiency across the board. Next, we divide the sample into three clusters according to enterprises’ innovation ability. In the first cluster, which has the least innovation ability, research institute-industry collaboration, university-industry collaboration and government funding have no significant effect on enterprise innovation efficiency. In the second and third clusters, university-industry collaboration exerts a negative impact on innovation efficiency but government funding improves innovation efficiency. At the same time, we investigate the interaction effects of enterprise R&D personnel and academia-industry collaboration and government funding on innovation efficiency. We find some heterogeneity in the full sample and the three sub-samples.

management
Research and development model, technology spillovers and optimal government subsidy

Ruo-bing DENG,Fu-xiang WU

DOI: https://doi.org/10.16192/j.cnki.1003-2053.2017.06.006

2017-01-01

Abstract:Based on the perspective of product quality improvement innovation,the paper puts the technological spillover level,product level difference and vertical quality difference together into the analysis framework,and constructs a three-stage dynamic game model to discuss the R&D investment decision and government optimization under different R&D model.The results show:government subsidy can improve the enthusiasm of R&D investment and social welfare,and will not produce " crowding-out effect";The level of technological spillover and the degree of product differentiation both have different effects on the optimal subsidy intensity under different R&D models;Whether in R&D competition model or R&D cooperation model,enterprise R&D investment,product quality and social welfare level are always the same under the optimal subsidy intensity,and enterprises prefer to choose the R&D model of profit maximization.The case analysis verifies model validity.Therefore,the enterprise itself should strengthen R&D investment to improve product quality competitiveness,and the government should formulate a reasonable range of subsidy intensity for different R&D innovation modes and industry cycle characteristics to improve the efficiency of innovation incentive by strengthening the construction of enterprise subsidy qualification examination system,but also should strengthen the enterprise subsidy qualification examination system construction to improve innovation incentive efficiency.
Enterprise Innovation, Government Subsidies, and Bank Loans: an Empirical Analysis from the Science and Technology Innovation Board of China

Yongmei Fang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-023-01624-y

IF: 1.815

2024-03-12

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

Abstract:This research explored the relationship between the innovation of high-tech enterprises and bank loans and the role of government subsidies between them. The pre-listing data of 415 high-tech enterprises was employed to examine the innovation's ability to obtain bank loans on the Science and Technology Innovation Board (SSE STAR) Market and found that the enterprise innovation of high-tech enterprises can positively affect bank (short-term) loans scale of enterprises but does not significantly affect the scale of long-term loans. Further analysis showed that such an effect was due to the existence of a mediation effect of government subsidy, which facilitates high-tech companies to obtain bank loans. This research also found the heterogeneous effects of enterprise innovation in different types and in different industries on bank loans. This paper con- tributes to providing a new way to reduce the information asymmetry between the financing parties; The findings also suggest a new perspective of information disclosure for the financing of high-tech enterprises.

economics

Prinzipien der intramedullären Knochenbruchstabilisierung Teil 1

Can government subsidy strategies and strategy combinations effectively stimulate enterprise innovation? Theory and evidence

Research on the Promotion Effect of Government Subsidies on Innovation of High-Tech Enterprises

Do government subsidies promote enterprise innovation?——Evidence from Chinese listed companies

The Stimulating Effects of R&D Subsidies on Independent Innovation of Chinese Enterprises

How innovation funding leads enterprises to engage in research and development: Small and medium enterprises' perspective

An Empirical Study on Optimal Strategies of Industry-University-Institute Green Innovation with Subsidy

The Effect of Government Subsidies on Firm R&D Investment in China: From Perspectives of Ownership and Market Power

The Influence of Government Subsidies on Enterprise Innovation Performance

Government subsidy design: knowledge transfer in R&D networks considering risk attitudes and reputation effects

The Impact of Government Subsidies on Technological Innovation in Agribusiness: The Case for China

Why do Chinese enterprises make imitative innovation?—An empirical explanation based on government subsidies

R&D subsidies, executive background and innovation of Chinese listed companies

Do government subsidies improve innovation investment for new energy firms: A quasi-natural experiment of China's listed companies

Government Subsidies and Firm Technological Innovation Performance: An Empirical Study Based on Panel Data of High-tech Firms

Does internationalization encourage state-owned enterprises to utilize subsidies to innovate? Evidence from high-tech and automobile manufacturing industries of Chinese listed companies

Government Subsidies and Enterprise Innovation: Evidence from China's Photovoltaic Industry

The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective

Academia-industry collaboration, government funding and innovation efficiency in Chinese industrial enterprises

Research and development model, technology spillovers and optimal government subsidy

Enterprise Innovation, Government Subsidies, and Bank Loans: an Empirical Analysis from the Science and Technology Innovation Board of China