One-Year Longitudinal Assessment of Patients With CMT1A Using Quantitative MRI

Etienne Fortanier,Marc Adrien Hostin,Constance Michel,Emilien Delmont,Marc-Emmanuel Bellemare,Maxime Guye,David Bendahan,Shahram Attarian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000209277
IF: 9.9
2024-05-14
Neurology
Abstract:Background and objectives: Intramuscular fat fraction (FF) assessed using quantitative MRI (qMRI) has emerged as one of the few responsive outcome measures in CMT1A suitable for future clinical trials. This study aimed to identify the relevance of multiple qMRI biomarkers for tracking longitudinal changes in CMT1A and to assess correlations between MRI metrics and clinical parameters. Methods: qMRI was performed in CMT1A patients at 2 time points, a year apart, and various metrics were extracted from 3-dimensional volumes of interest at thigh and leg levels. A semiautomated segmentation technique was used, enabling the analysis of central slices and a larger 3D muscle volume. Metrics included proton density (PD), magnetization transfer ratio (MTR), and intramuscular FF. The sciatic and tibial nerves were also assessed. Disease severity was gauged using Charcot Marie Tooth Neurologic Score (CMTNSv2), Charcot Marie Tooth Examination Score, Overall Neuropathy Limitation Scale scores, and Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle strength. Results: Twenty-four patients were included. FF significantly rose in the 3D volume at both thigh (+1.04% ± 2.19%, p = 0.041) and leg (+1.36% ± 1.87%, p = 0.045) levels. The 3D analyses unveiled a length-dependent gradient in FF, ranging from 22.61% ± 10.17% to 26.17% ± 10.79% at the leg level. There was noticeable variance in longitudinal changes between muscles: +3.17% ± 6.86% (p = 0.028) in the tibialis anterior compared with 0.37% ± 4.97% (p = 0.893) in the gastrocnemius medialis. MTR across the entire thigh volume showed a significant decline between the 2 time points -2.75 ± 6.58 (p = 0.049), whereas no significant differences were noted for the 3D muscle volume and PD. No longitudinal changes were observed in any nerve metric. Potent correlations were identified between FF and primary clinical measures: CMTNSv2 (ρ = 0.656; p = 0.001) and MRC in the lower limbs (ρ = -0.877; p < 0.001). Discussion: Our results further support that qMRI is a promising tool for following up longitudinal changes in CMT1A patients, FF being the paramount MRI metric for both thigh and leg regions. It is crucial to scrutinize the postimaging data extraction methods considering that annual changes are minimal (around +1.5%). Given the varied FF distribution, the existence of a length-dependent gradient, and the differential fatty involution across muscles, 3D volume analysis appeared more suitable than single slice analysis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?