A Systematic Review on Evaluation Strategies for Field Assessment of Upper-Body Industrial Exoskeletons: Current Practices and Future Trends
Pranav Madhav Kuber,Masoud Abdollahi,Mohammad Mehdi Alemi,Ehsan Rashedi
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-022-03003-1
IF: 3.8
2022-08-03
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
Abstract:With rising manual work demands, physical assistance at the workplace is crucial, wherein the use of industrial exoskeletons ( i- EXOs) could be advantageous. However, outcomes of numerous laboratory studies may not be directly translated to field environments. To explore this discrepancy, we conducted a systematic review including 31 studies to identify and compare the approaches, techniques, and outcomes within field assessments of shoulder and back support i -EXOs. Findings revealed that the subjective approaches [i.e., discomfort (23), usability (22), acceptance/perspectives (21), risk of injury (8), posture (3), perceived workload (2)] were reported more common (27) compared to objective (15) approaches [muscular demand (14), kinematics (8), metabolic costs (5)]. High variability was also observed in the experimental methodologies, including control over activity, task physics/duration, sample size, and reported metrics/measures. In the current study, the detailed approaches, their subject-related factors, and observed trends have been discussed. In sum, a new guideline, including tools/technologies has been proposed that could be utilized for field evaluation of i -EXOs. Lastly, we discussed some of the common technical challenges experimenters face in evaluating i -EXOs in field environments. Efforts presented in this study seek to improve the generalizability in testing and implementing i -EXOs.
engineering, biomedical