Talus osteoid osteoma misdiagnosed as ankle synovitis: A case report in rehabilitation therapy
Jincheng Xu,Yan Zhang,Shuming Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000040682
IF: 1.6
2024-12-01
Medicine
Abstract:The confusion in diagnosing ankle osteoid osteoma (OO) and ankle synovitis arises from their overlapping clinical presentations and imaging findings. [ 1 ] OO is a common benign bone tumor that can show signs like inflammatory synovitis, like joint effusion, soft-tissue swelling, ankle pain, and limited joint motion. [ 2 ] This resemblance can lead to diagnostic challenges, especially when the tumor is located intracapsularly. [ 3 , 4 ] A study by Bauer et al (1991) [ 5 ] highlighted this issue, revealing a significant delay in diagnosis, with an average of 24 months from initial presentation to accurate identification. Radiographs in these patients were frequently inconclusive, showing either negative results or only secondary changes. Similarly, OO is a condition characterized by cartilaginous nodules within the synovium, is rare in smaller joints such as the ankle. [ 6 ] As noted by Sedeek et al (2015), [ 7 ] its diagnosis usually requires a comprehensive approach involving a detailed history, clinical and physical examination, and radiographic evaluation. This article describes the diagnostic trajectory of a patient with ankle OO from initial suspicion to definitive diagnosis, highlighting the critical role of multidisciplinary collaboration. This case report follows the CARE Guidelines. [ 8 ]
medicine, general & internal