A comprehensive MRI analysis of osteoid osteomas in patients with diverse radiological features across various regions
Merve Yazol,Halil Ozer,Umut Asfuroğlu,Nil Tokgoz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.23766
2024-07-14
Journal of Clinical Ultrasound
Abstract:An extensive MRI review of osteoid osteomas identifies key radiological patterns, highlighting a high prevalence in long bones and variable nidus presentation. The majority of osteoid osteomas were located in long bones, with fewer in flat bones. Most of the lesions were extra‐articular, while a smaller portion were intra‐articular. The nidus was intracortical in most patients, with fewer cases being intramedullary, subperiosteal, or endosteal. The average nidus diameter was around 7 mm. Central nidal calcification was present in the majority of cases. Contrast enhancement was predominantly intense, with a few cases showing moderate enhancement. Reactive sclerosis around the nidus varied from severe to moderate and mild. Bone marrow edema was predominantly severe, with some cases of moderate and mild edema. Soft tissue edema was identified in most of the lesions. The findings advocate for enhanced radiologist awareness of these patterns to reduce diagnostic delays for this condition, which is notably common in the younger population. Background Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which does not involve ionizing radiation, is the preferred imaging modality for diagnosing osteoid osteoma (OO), an ailment more common in children and young adults. Purpose This study aims to perform a literature review and delineate the MRI findings of OO lesions in patients exhibiting varying radiological features across different regions. Materials and methods A retrospective study included 63 patients diagnosed with OO through MRI, assessed independently by two blinded radiologists using both standard and dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI techniques. After excluding 7 patients with prior biopsy, surgery, or RFA, the study included 56 patients with 57 lesions. Results Of 57 lesions evaluated, 50 were in long, and 7 in flat bones. One patient presented with two separate nidi within the intertrochanteric region. Most of the lesions, 49 (86%), were extra‐articular, while 8 (14%) were intra‐articular. The nidus was intracortical in 45 (78.9%) patients, intramedullary in 5 (8.8%), subperiosteal in 5 (8.8%), and endosteal in 2 (3.5%). Average nidus diameter was 7.02 ± 2.64 mm (3–12.6 mm). Central nidal calcification was present in 68.4% (n = 39) cases. Contrast enhancement was intense at 90.5%, moderate at 9.5%. Reactive sclerosis around the nidus was severe (50.9%), moderate (22.8%), and mild (26.3%). Bone marrow edema was severe (70.2%), moderate (14.0%), and mild (15.8%). Soft tissue edema was identified in 77.2% of all lesions. Conclusion To minimize delays in diagnosis and treatment, radiologists should become acquainted with the typical OO MRI findings and the atypical MRI findings that might be mistaken for other conditions.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,acoustics