Rationale and design of CHD PULSE: Congenital Heart Disease Project to Understand Lifelong Survivor Experience
Matthew E Oster,Yanxu Yang,Caroline Shi,Susan Anderson,Jessica Knight,Logan G Spector,Osamah Aldoss,Charles E Canter,Mansi Gaitonde,Gurumurthy Hiremath,Anitha John,Deborah J Kozik,Bradley S Marino,Kimberly E McHugh,David Overman,Geetha Raghuveer,James Louis St,Jeffrey P Jacobs,Michelle Gurvitz,Grace Smith,J'Neka S Claxton,Kristina Kuo,Jessica M Flores,Romie N Velani,Amanda Thomas,Ann Mertens,Mason Basler,Violet Carey,Charlotte Gavalas,Madison Johnson,Anita Mathews,Jennifer Nelson,Katrin O'Grady,Emily Riley,Michelle Roesler,Amber Sykes,Daniel Young,Lazaros K Kochilas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2024.09.003
2024-09-17
Abstract:Background: With improved survival of adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) comes a need to understand the lifelong outcomes of this population. The aim of this paper is to describe the rationale and design of Congenital Heart Disease Project to Understand Lifelong Survivor Experience (CHD PULSE), a study to determine long-term medical, neurocognitive, and psychosocial outcomes among adults with a history of intervention for CHD and to identify factors associated with those outcomes. Methods: CHD PULSE is a cross-sectional survey conducted from September 2021 to April 2023 among adults aged 18 and older with a history of at least 1 intervention for CHD at 1 of 11 participating U.S. centers in the Pediatric Cardiac Care Consortium. Participants with CHD were asked to complete a 99-question survey on a variety of topics including: demographics, surgeries, health insurance, health care, heart doctors, general health, height and weight, education and work history, reproductive health (for women only), and COVID-19. To construct a control group for the study, siblings of survey respondents were invited to complete a similar survey. Descriptive statistics for demographics, disease severity, center, and method of survey completion were computed for participants and controls. Comparisons were made between participants and non-participants to assess for response bias and between CHD participants and sibling controls to assess for baseline differences. Results: Among the 14,322 eligible participants, there were 3,133 respondents (21.9%) from 48 U.S. states with surveys returned for inclusion in the study. Sibling contact information was provided by 691 respondents, with surveys returned by 326 siblings (47.2%). The median age of participants was 32.8 years at time of survey completion, with an interquartile range of 27.2 years to 39.7 years and an overall range of 20.1 to 82.9 years. Participants were predominantly female (55.1%) and of non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity (87.1%). There were no differences between participants and non-participants regarding severity of CHD. Compared to nonparticipants, participants were more likely to be female, of older age, and be of non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity. Enrolled siblings were more likely to be female and slightly younger than participants. Conclusions: With surveys from 3,133 participants from across the U.S., CHD PULSE is poised to provide keen insights into the lifelong journey of those living with CHD, extending beyond mere survival. These insights will offer opportunities for informing strategies to enhance and improve future outcomes for this population of patients.