Validation of a novel donor lung scoring system based on the updated lung Composite Allocation Score

Zhizhou Yang,Yun Zhu Bai,Yan Yan,Ramsey R Hachem,Chad A Witt,Rodrigo Vazquez Guillamet,Derek E Byers,Gary F Marklin,Daniel Kreisel,Ruben G Nava,Bryan F Meyers,Benjamin D Kozower,G Alexander Patterson,Matthew G Hartwig,Brendan T Heiden,Varun Puri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2024.03.032
Abstract:Lung transplantation (LTx) continues to have lower rates of long-term graft survival compared with other organs. Additionally, lung utilization rates from brain-dead donors remain substantially lower compared with other solid organs, despite a growing need for LTx and the significant risk of waitlist mortality. This study aims to examine the effects of using a combination of the recently described novel lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score and the newly adopted recipient lung Composite Allocation Score (CAS) to guide transplantation. We performed a review of nearly 18 000 adult primary lung transplants from 2015-2022 across the US with retroactive calculations of the CAS value. The medium-CAS group (29.6-34.5) had superior 1-year posttransplant survival. Importantly, the combination of high-CAS (> 34.5) recipients with low LUNDON score (≤ 40) donors had the worst survival at 1 year compared with any other combination. Additionally, we constructed a model that predicts 1-year and 3-year survival using the LUNDON acceptability score and CAS values. These results suggest that caution should be exercised when using marginally acceptable donor lungs in high-priority recipients. The use of the LUNDON score with CAS value can potentially guide clinical decision-making for optimal donor-recipient matches for LTx.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?