Development and validation of the lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score for pulmonary transplantation

Brendan T Heiden,Zhizhou Yang,Yun Zhu Bai,Yan Yan,Su-Hsin Chang,Yikyung Park,Graham A Colditz,Hank Dart,Ramsey R Hachem,Chad A Witt,Rodrigo Vazquez Guillamet,Derek E Byers,Gary F Marklin,Michael K Pasque,Daniel Kreisel,Ruben G Nava,Bryan F Meyers,Benjamin D Kozower,Varun Puri
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajt.2022.12.014
Abstract:There is a chronic shortage of donor lungs for pulmonary transplantation due, in part, to low lung utilization rates in the United States. We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database (2006-2019) and developed the lung donor (LUNDON) acceptability score. A total of 83 219 brain-dead donors were included and were randomly divided into derivation (n = 58 314, 70%) and validation (n = 24 905, 30%) cohorts. The overall lung acceptance was 27.3% (n = 22 767). Donor factors associated with the lung acceptance were age, maximum creatinine, ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen, mechanism of death by asphyxiation or drowning, history of cigarette use (≥20 pack-years), history of myocardial infarction, chest x-ray appearance, bloodstream infection, and the occurrence of cardiac arrest after brain death. The prediction model had high discriminatory power (C statistic, 0.891; 95% confidence interval, 0.886-0.895) in the validation cohort. We developed a web-based, user-friendly tool (available at https://sites.wustl.edu/lundon) that provides the predicted probability of donor lung acceptance. LUNDON score was also associated with recipient survival in patients with high lung allocation scores. In conclusion, the multivariable LUNDON score uses readily available donor characteristics to reliably predict lung acceptability. Widespread adoption of this model may standardize lung donor evaluation and improve lung utilization rates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?