Investigating the impact of standard brain atlases and connectivity measures on the accuracy of ADHD detection from fMRI data using deep learning
Snigdha Agarwal,Adarsh Raj,Anjan Chowdhury,Geetanjali Aich,Rajdeep Chatterjee,Kuntal Ghosh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17962-7
IF: 2.577
2024-01-24
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Abstract:Inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity are among the symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Syndrome (ADHD). This brain disorder cannot currently be treated or avoided. A kid or adult with ADHD may be able to control their symptoms, though, if they are diagnosed early and have a good treatment and education plan. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) is one of the non-invasive imaging techniques used to diagnose ADHD. The blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) signals extracted from several brain regions (obtained by choosing a brain atlas) are processed to form a brain functional connectivity matrix and fed into a deep learning model for the classification of ADHD. In this paper, we study two things: first , we diagnose the ADHD using fMRI data by proposing two approaches, viz., an image-based approach and a graph-based (network-based) approach. In the image-based approach, the connectivity matrix obtained from the fMRI data is used directly as an image, and the whole image is fed into a deep learning model. In the network-based approach, the connectivity matrix is first converted into an adjacency matrix, which represents an undirected network. After that, several network properties are accumulated as features, and the feature vector is fed into the deep learning model. Second , we study how the choice of a particular brain atlas or connectivity matrix can affect the accuracy of the ADHD diagnosis. The suggested algorithms, along with six different atlases and two different connectivity matrices, are compared using 352 fMRI images and various one- and two-dimensional neural network models. Our finding demonstrates that accuracy varies depending on the atlases and connectivity measurements used. In addition, we have shown that, with a particular setup, our algorithms outperform a number of deep-learning baselines showing the second best (ranging from 74.48% to 90.90%) results most of the time. Application of various atlases and connectivity matrices shows 64% variations in the overall accuracy.
computer science, information systems, theory & methods,engineering, electrical & electronic, software engineering