Abstract:Organizational Psychology Review, Volume 14, Issue 2, Page 360-369, May 2024. Where has our reach and impact gone? As behavioral scientists, it is incumbent upon us to extend the reach of our work. Doing so is never easy unless you follow a few approaches. This manuscript underscores the imperative for behavioral scientists to communicate their research findings beyond traditional academic confines, targeting non-scientific audiences. We outline strategic steps that scholars can adopt to enhance the visibility, accessibility, and impact of their research. These include (1) translating scientific jargon into comprehensible language; (2) leveraging digital platforms like blogs, podcasts, and social media; (3) collaborating with media professionals for broader outreach; (4) engaging in public talks and community forums; and (5) developing buy-in from the audiences needed for organizational success. Implementing these strategies not only reinforces the societal relevance of social behavioral science, but also fosters a more informed and engaged public, bridging the gap between academia and the broader community.Plain language summary (latham & alonso)Too often behavioral scientists find themselves languishing in navel-gazing postures because of our incentivization systems. We, behavioral scientists, are rewarded for publishing in peer-reviewed journals where we communicate with one another in the most abstruse jargon imaginable. It comes as no surprise then that we seldom find ourselves translating theory into applied work and, even more seldom, making an impact on real-world problems.While we find ourselves in low-impact, high navel-gazing situations often, there are several things we can do to take application to theory and, vice versa, enhance theory into applied settings. Throughout this manuscript, Latham and Alonso provide a thorough examination of how behavioral scientists can develop partnerships with stakeholder groups. Further, they examine how learning programs can adapt to build partnership skillsets among behavioral scientists. Finally, they apply their findings to an example involving the application of theory around interactive justice.

From fringe to mainstream: The Garcia effect

The Ecology of Fringe Science and its Bearing on Policy

A translational and multidisciplinary approach to studying the Garcia effect, a higher form of learning with deep evolutionary roots

Imagine moving behavioral science findings languishing in scholarly journals to public consumption

How experimental methods shaped views on human competence and rationality.

Experimental Psychology and Psychoanalysis: What We Can Learn from a Century of Misunderstanding

What counts as good science? How the battle for methodological legitimacy affects public psychology.

Counterintuitive Pseudoscience Propagates by Exploiting the Mind's Communication Evaluation Mechanisms

Optimal Marginality: Innovation and Orthodoxy in Fromm's Revision of Psychoanalysis

Decoloniality and Disruption of the Scientific Status Quo: Dissemination of Universal Theoretical Assumptions in International Research

Embracing the Paradigm Shift from Variable-Based to Case-Based Modeling

Conditioning Conformity: A Neuroscientific Funding and Publishing Paradox

The Psychology of the Paranormal

A new perspective on trends in psychology

The birth, death and resurrection of avoidance: a reconceptualization of a troubled paradigm

Writing telepathy back into marketing theory

Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology

Positive Deviance Underlies Successful Science: Normative Methodologies Risk Throwing out the Baby With the Bathwater

The Effects of Jargon on Processing Fluency, Self-Perceptions, and Scientific Engagement

Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias

Reflection to freedom: Return of a fundamental discourse in Contemporary Psychology