Efficacy and Safety of Snap Needles in the Treatment of Postoperative Hemorrhoidal Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s464176
IF: 2.8319
2024-06-08
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Qinqin Huang, 1– 3 Yun Wang, 1– 3 Xiaobao Wang, 1 Zhenhua Xiang, 1 Haixia Wang, 1, 2 Aiju Wang, 1 Weiguo Liu, 1 Yuming Gu 1– 3 1 Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, 261042, People's Republic of China; 2 College of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, 261000, People's Republic of China; 3 Clinical Research Center, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, Shandong Province, 261042, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Yuming Gu, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical College, Weicheng District, Weifang City, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China, Email Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Snap Needles (SN) in the management of Postoperative Hemorrhoidal Pain (POHP). Patients and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in various databases, including EMBASE, Web of Science, PubMed, WanFang database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP), spanning from their inception to August 2023, to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on SN for POHP. The primary outcome measure was the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while secondary outcomes encompassed the Total Effective Rate (TER), Wound Healing Time (WHT), Pain Relief Time (PRT), Pain Disappearance Time (PDT), and Adverse Events (AEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was employed to assess the quality of individual studies. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4.1 software. Results: The meta-analysis included 11 RCTs involving 1188 POHP patients, with an overall assessment of study quality ranging from very low to moderate. The findings revealed that the SN group exhibited significant improvements in treatment outcomes when compared to the control group (CG). These improvements were reflected in reduced VAS scores (mean difference [MD] = − 1.10, 95% confidence interval [CI]: − 1.31, − 0.89, P < 0.05), shorter WHT (MD = − 2.55, 95% CI: − 3.02, − 2.09, P < 0.05), quicker PRT (MD = − 7.99, 95% CI: − 8.48, − 7.49, P < 0.05), fewer AEs (risk ratio [RR] = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.22, 0.67, P < 0.05), improved TER (RR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.27, P < 0.05), and faster PDT (MD = 19.24, 95% CI: 14.17, 24.31, P < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of SN appears to yield favorable outcomes in the treatment of POHP, and is potentially an alternative therapy to western drug therapy. Keywords: snap needles, SN, postoperative hemorrhoidal pain, POHP, auricular acupuncture, systematic review, meta-analysis Hemorrhoids represent one of the most prevalent anorectal conditions, characterized by clinical symptoms including pain, bleeding, itching, and prolapse, and can manifest at any stage of life. 1 In China, the incidence of anal and intestinal disorders is estimated at approximately 51.14%, with hemorrhoids ranking as the foremost condition, affecting around 50.28% of individuals. 2 This high prevalence significantly impacts the quality of life for affected individuals, 2 and presents a substantial challenge in both the medical and socio-economic domains. 3 The approach to treating hemorrhoids is contingent upon the symptoms and the stage of the condition. Hemorrhoidectomy is widely acknowledged as an effective intervention for conservative management, particularly in cases of refractory, grade III, and grade IV hemorrhoids. 4 However, a prevalent issue following hemorrhoidectomy is the occurrence of pain. 5 This pain is significant, with reports indicating that up to 65% of patients experience moderate to severe discomfort, leading to analgesic requirements that include both opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for as many as 40% of patients. 6 Consequently, this pain can impede recovery and result in extended hospitalization. Presently, Western medicine predominantly employs oral or local analgesic medications for postoperative hemorrhoidectomy pain relief. However, these medications often come with significant side effects. Opioid analgesics, for instance, carry the risk of respiratory depression and the potential for addiction. On the other hand, NSAIDs, while offering pain relief, may induce adverse effects such as peptic ulcers or gastrointestinal hemorrhage. 7 In light of these concerns, there is a growing interest in exploring the use of effective and safe Tradition -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology