Abstract:Plain english summary: Usher syndrome is the most common cause of deafblindness worldwide and is estimated to affect between 3 and 6 people in every 100,000. Children are born with hearing loss and develop sight loss in their early years of life. A barrier to the involvement and participation of deafblind people in research is access to information in appropriate formats. The degree of sight and hearing impairment experienced by individuals is variable, so there is not a one size fits all solution. We held a research discussion group, that included five people with Usher syndrome, to consider people's accessibility needs for an upcoming research project involving this condition.We have identified a number of considerations for including deafblind people in conversations about research: i) using appropriately sized meeting rooms which offer control over lighting, layout and sound; ii) where appropriate, ensuring written/printed materials are high contrast (e.g. black text with a yellow background) and in large (18 point and above), sans-serif fonts (e.g. Arial); iii) identifying the relevant communication support for the individual whether that be sign language interpretation, lip reading, hearing loop, speech to text reporting or a combination; iv) ensuring that there is access to emotional support for both people who are deafblind and their families before, during and after the research.The outcome of this work is a checklist of considerations when planning to hold a research conversation with someone who is deafblind and hinges on earlier interactions to identify the appropriate support needs for the individual. Abstract: Background Usher syndrome is the most common cause of deafblindness worldwide. Children are born with hearing loss and develop sight loss in their early years of life. It is estimated to affect between 3 and 6 people in every 100,000. A barrier to the involvement and participation of deafblind people in research is access to information in appropriate formats. Individuals have varying degrees of sight and hearing impairment meaning there is not a singular solution to supporting all people's communication needs. There is evidence that severe sight and hearing impairments are used as exclusion criteria in some research studies. This exclusion may extend into involvement activities. Methods Eight people, including five people with Usher syndrome, attended a research discussion group. Through this activity, we identified what to consider when looking to improve the experience of taking part in a discussion about research for deafblind individuals. Results Among contributors two people made use of standard British Sign Language interpretation and one communicated using hands-on signing. Contributors highlighted the limitations associated with signing and lip reading such as exhaustion and clear lines of sight as well as the need for additional formats such as speech to text reporting, and high contrast (e.g. black text with a yellow background) printouts with large (18 point and above), sans-serif fonts (e.g. Arial). A large proportion of discussions were on the importance of wrap around emotional support for people who are deafblind and their family throughout the research pathway. This includes counselling, peer support and sensitive and mindful facilitators of involvement activities. Conclusions The range and specific nature of the communication methods and support offerings that deafblind people depend on are broad and require researchers and involvement practitioners to reach out to deafblind contributors earlier on, in order to appropriately tailor approaches and put the most suitable support in place. Informed by this discussion group, we have developed a checklist of key considerations to support the inclusion of deafblind individuals in research conversations, supplemented with input from the sensory disability charity Sense.

Considerations when asking about "disability" in disability inclusive research

For Optimal Inclusivity in the Research Process, Researchers Should Reflect Early and Often on How to Create Welcoming Research Environments

Overcoming barriers to the involvement of deafblind people in conversations about research: recommendations from individuals with Usher syndrome

Understanding disability and the ‘social determinants of health’: how does disability affect peoples’ social determinants of health?

Opening the door to university health research: recommendations for increasing accessibility for individuals with intellectual disability

Experiences of researchers with disabilities at academic institutions in the United States

PPIE in a technical research study: Using public involvement to refine the concept and understanding and move towards a multidimensional concept of disability

To what extent can people with communication difficulties contribute to health research?

The Neurodiversity Approach(es): What Are They and What Do They Mean for Researchers?

Use of the CONSIDER statement by eye health researchers when conducting and reporting research involving Indigenous peoples: an online survey

Governance of research involving people with psychosocial disabilities

'Learning Difficulties', the Social Model of Disability and Impairment: Challenging epistemologies

Participatory Research in Disability in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: What have we Learnt and what Should we Do?

Identifying priorities for Australian disability research using Q methodology

Abstract HUP13: Participants With Complex Impairment Profiles Are Systematically Excluded From Stroke Psychosocial Support Research: A Scoping Review

Understanding the interaction between support and social participation for people with physical disabilities: a scoping review protocol

Research About Us, With Us: An Inclusive Research Case Study

Disability Discourse: Overview and Critiques of the Medical and Social Models

Improving the inclusivity and credibility of visual research: interpretive engagement as a route to including the voices of people with learning disabilities in analysis

General Considerations for Conducting Online Qualitative Research and Practice Implications for Interviewing People with Acquired Brain Injury

Engaging with discursive complexities in mental health accessibility: Implications for acquired brain injury