Abstract:Plain english summary: Usher syndrome is the most common cause of deafblindness worldwide and is estimated to affect between 3 and 6 people in every 100,000. Children are born with hearing loss and develop sight loss in their early years of life. A barrier to the involvement and participation of deafblind people in research is access to information in appropriate formats. The degree of sight and hearing impairment experienced by individuals is variable, so there is not a one size fits all solution. We held a research discussion group, that included five people with Usher syndrome, to consider people's accessibility needs for an upcoming research project involving this condition.We have identified a number of considerations for including deafblind people in conversations about research: i) using appropriately sized meeting rooms which offer control over lighting, layout and sound; ii) where appropriate, ensuring written/printed materials are high contrast (e.g. black text with a yellow background) and in large (18 point and above), sans-serif fonts (e.g. Arial); iii) identifying the relevant communication support for the individual whether that be sign language interpretation, lip reading, hearing loop, speech to text reporting or a combination; iv) ensuring that there is access to emotional support for both people who are deafblind and their families before, during and after the research.The outcome of this work is a checklist of considerations when planning to hold a research conversation with someone who is deafblind and hinges on earlier interactions to identify the appropriate support needs for the individual. Abstract: Background Usher syndrome is the most common cause of deafblindness worldwide. Children are born with hearing loss and develop sight loss in their early years of life. It is estimated to affect between 3 and 6 people in every 100,000. A barrier to the involvement and participation of deafblind people in research is access to information in appropriate formats. Individuals have varying degrees of sight and hearing impairment meaning there is not a singular solution to supporting all people's communication needs. There is evidence that severe sight and hearing impairments are used as exclusion criteria in some research studies. This exclusion may extend into involvement activities. Methods Eight people, including five people with Usher syndrome, attended a research discussion group. Through this activity, we identified what to consider when looking to improve the experience of taking part in a discussion about research for deafblind individuals. Results Among contributors two people made use of standard British Sign Language interpretation and one communicated using hands-on signing. Contributors highlighted the limitations associated with signing and lip reading such as exhaustion and clear lines of sight as well as the need for additional formats such as speech to text reporting, and high contrast (e.g. black text with a yellow background) printouts with large (18 point and above), sans-serif fonts (e.g. Arial). A large proportion of discussions were on the importance of wrap around emotional support for people who are deafblind and their family throughout the research pathway. This includes counselling, peer support and sensitive and mindful facilitators of involvement activities. Conclusions The range and specific nature of the communication methods and support offerings that deafblind people depend on are broad and require researchers and involvement practitioners to reach out to deafblind contributors earlier on, in order to appropriately tailor approaches and put the most suitable support in place. Informed by this discussion group, we have developed a checklist of key considerations to support the inclusion of deafblind individuals in research conversations, supplemented with input from the sensory disability charity Sense.

To what extent can people with communication difficulties contribute to health research?

Patient and public involvement in hearing research: opportunities, impact and reflections with case studies from the Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness

Guidance on how to involve people with lived experience in research on digital mental health interventions

The Challenges of Including Patients With Aphasia in Qualitative Research for Health Service Redesign: Qualitative Interview Study

A little more conversation please? Qualitative study of researchers’ and patients’ interview accounts of training for patient and public involvement in clinical trials

Interviewing persons-supported in an evaluation of individual person-centred care plan development for community-care services: practical methodological considerations

"Living in a foreign country": experiences of staff-patient communication in inpatient stroke settings for people with post-stroke aphasia and those supporting them

Public and participant involvement as a pathway to inclusive dementia research

'It's all communication': Family members' perspectives on the communication needs for themselves and their relatives with primary progressive aphasia

What are the strengths and limitations to utilising creative methods in public and patient involvement in health and social care research? A qualitative systematic review

What really is nontokenistic fully inclusive patient and public involvement/engagement in research?

The role of Patient and public involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: An interview study

Inclusion of adults with conditions that have the potential to affect capacity and or communication in research: triangulation from a mixed-methods study of current practice and values across multiple stakeholders

A framework for more equitable, diverse, and inclusive Patient and Public Involvement for palliative care research

Preliminary outcomes from a pilot study of personalised online supported conversation for participation intervention for people with Aphasia

Are People with Aphasia Included in Stroke Trials? A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

Overcoming barriers to the involvement of deafblind people in conversations about research: recommendations from individuals with Usher syndrome

PPIE in a technical research study: Using public involvement to refine the concept and understanding and move towards a multidimensional concept of disability

Efficacy of online communication partner training package for student healthcare professionals

Patient and public involvement in doctoral research: reflections and experiences of the PPI contributors and researcher

Perspectives of researchers and clinicians on patient and public involvement (PPI) in preclinical spinal cord research: An interview study