Abstract:Background Wearable trackers for monitoring physical activity (PA) and total sleep time (TST) are increasingly popular. These devices are used not only by consumers to monitor their behavior but also by researchers to track the behavior of large samples and by health professionals to implement interventions aimed at health promotion and to remotely monitor patients. However, high costs and accuracy concerns may be barriers to widespread adoption. Objective This study aimed to investigate the concurrent validity of 6 low-cost activity trackers for measuring steps, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA), and TST: Geonaut On Coach, iWown i5 Plus, MyKronoz ZeFit4, Nokia GO, VeryFit 2.0, and Xiaomi MiBand 2. Methods A free-living protocol was used in which 20 adults engaged in their usual daily activities and sleep. For 3 days and 3 nights, they simultaneously wore a low-cost tracker and a high-cost tracker (Fitbit Charge HR) on the nondominant wrist. Participants wore an ActiGraph GT3X+ accelerometer on the hip at daytime and a BodyMedia SenseWear device on the nondominant upper arm at nighttime. Validity was assessed by comparing each tracker with the ActiGraph GT3X+ and BodyMedia SenseWear using mean absolute percentage error scores, correlations, and Bland-Altman plots in IBM SPSS 24.0. Results Large variations were shown between trackers. Low-cost trackers showed moderate-to-strong correlations (Spearman r=0.53-0.91) and low-to-good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=0.51-0.90) for measuring steps. Weak-to-moderate correlations (Spearman r=0.24-0.56) and low agreement (ICC=0.18-0.56) were shown for measuring MVPA. For measuring TST, the low-cost trackers showed weak-to-strong correlations (Spearman r=0.04-0.73) and low agreement (ICC=0.05-0.52). The Bland-Altman plot revealed a variation between overcounting and undercounting for measuring steps, MVPA, and TST, depending on the used low-cost tracker. None of the trackers, including Fitbit (a high-cost tracker), showed high validity to measure MVPA. Conclusions This study was the first to examine the concurrent validity of low-cost trackers. Validity was strongest for the measurement of steps; there was evidence of validity for measurement of sleep in some trackers, and validity for measurement of MVPA time was weak throughout all devices. Validity ranged between devices, with Xiaomi having the highest validity for measurement of steps and VeryFit performing relatively strong across both sleep and steps domains. Low-cost trackers hold promise for monitoring and measurement of movement and sleep behaviors, both for consumers and researchers.

Performances of decorrelating MUD using STBC for image transmissions in rayleigh fading channel

Performance of wearable sleep trackers during nocturnal sleep and periods of simulated real-world smartphone use

Performance of seven consumer sleep-tracking devices compared with polysomnography

Low-Cost Consumer-Based Trackers to Measure Physical Activity and Sleep Duration Among Adults in Free-Living Conditions: Validation Study

Performance of a Multisensor Smart Ring to Evaluate Sleep: In-Lab and Home-Based Evaluation Relative to Polysomnography and Actigraphy: Importance of Generalized Versus Personalized Scoring

Studies of the absorption and equilibration of water (deuterium oxide) from the gastrointestinal tract following injury.

Evaluating Accuracy in Five Commercial Sleep-Tracking Devices Compared to Research-Grade Actigraphy and Polysomnography

Validity, potential clinical utility, and comparison of consumer and research‐grade activity trackers in Insomnia Disorder I: In‐lab validation against polysomnography

Accuracy of Three Commercial Wearable Devices for Sleep Tracking in Healthy Adults

Metrology of two wearable sleep trackers against polysomnography in patients with sleep complaints

274 Multimodal longitudinal sleep tracking combining wearable, smartphone tap analysis and electronic questionnaires

Reliability of Sleep Measures from Four Personal Health Monitoring Devices Compared to Research-Based Actigraphy and Polysomnography

Performance Evaluation of the Circadia Contactless Breathing Monitor and Sleep Analysis Algorithm for Sleep Stage Classification

Performance evaluation of an under-mattress sleep sensor versus polysomnography in >400 nights with healthy and unhealthy sleep

Sleep assessment using EEG-based wearables - A systematic review

A Validation of Six Wearable Devices for Estimating Sleep, Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability in Healthy Adults

Measures of sleep and cardiac functioning during sleep using a multi-sensory commercially-available wristband in adolescents

The Dreem Headband compared to polysomnography for electroencephalographic signal acquisition and sleep staging

Feasibility Study of a Consumer Multi-Sensory Wristband to Monitor Sleep Disorder

Exploring the Potential of a New Wearable Sleep Monitoring Device for Clinical Application

Comparative Analysis of Sleep Parameters and Structures Derived from Wearable Flexible Electrode Sleep Patches and Polysomnography in Young Adults