Abstract:Purpose: The difference of Hounsfield Unit (HU) value in different regions of L3 vertebra in middle-aged and elderly patients with lumbar degeneration diseases (LDD) was analyzed. To investigate the influence of proliferative tissue on HU value of cancellous bone and its correlation with bone mineral density (BMD). Methods: The medical records of middle-aged and elderly patients with LDD in our hospital from December 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into osteophyte group and no-osteophyte group according to the presence or absence of osteophyte formation on lumbar spine X-ray. In osteophyte group, cancellous bone HU value, containing cortical bone overall HU value and containing osteophyte overall HU value in L3 vertebra were measured on the lumbar CT cross-section. In no-osteophyte group, only the cancellous bone HU value and the containing cortical bone overall HU value were measured. Differences in HU value in different regions of the L3 vertebral body were compared within and between groups of middle-aged and elderly patients with LDD, respectively. To investigate its effect on cancellous bone HU measurements and to do a correlation analysis with patients' BMD. Results: A total of 115 patients with LDD were included in this study, including 65 males and 50 females, with an average age of 67.83 ± 6.59 years. The results of the study showed no statistical differences in age (P = 0.15), gender (P = 0.57), smoking (P = 0.88), drinking history (P = 0.76), medical history (P > 0.05) and BMI(P = 0.29) between the two groups. In osteophyte group, the mean cancellous bone HU value was 98.00 ± 25.50 HU, the containing cortical bone overall HU value was 189.02 ± 46.18 HU, and the containing osteophyte overall HU value was 232.69 ± 56.01 HU. The overall HU values containing cortical bone and containing osteophyte were significantly higher than cancellous bone HU value (P < 0.001). In no-osteophyte group, the mean cancellous bone HU value was 102.04 ± 19.64 HU, and the containing cortical bone overall HU value was 175.00 ± 28.97 HU, which was statistically significantly different (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in cancellous bone HU value and the containing cortical bone overall HU value between the two groups (P > 0.05). The results of the Pearson correlation analysis showed a significant correlation between the cancellous bone HU value of the L3 vertebrae and the QCT BMD value of the patients (r = 0.95, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between containing cortical bone overall HU value and containing osteophyte overall HU value and the patient's QCT BMD value (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Vertebral HU value is an alternative measurement that effectively reflects the patient's BMD. In middle-aged and elderly LDD patients, HU values in different areas of L3 vertebra are significantly different, and hyperplastic tissues such as cortical bone and osteophytes may exponentially lead to higher HU value in patients. Compared with other measurement areas, vertebral cancellous bone HU value have the advantage of accurately assessing patients' BMD.

Interobserver variability in the determination of bone mineral density in Hounsfield units from differently configured fields of measurement in the cancellous bone of vertebral bodies from elderly body donors

Side specific differences of Hounsfield-Units in the osteoporotic lumbar spine

Accuracy and precision of volumetric bone mineral density assessment using dual-source dual-energy versus quantitative CT: a phantom study

Bone density of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar spine measured using Hounsfield units of computed tomography – results of 4350 vertebras

Accuracy of Phantomless Calibration of Routine Computed Tomography Scans for Opportunistic Osteoporosis Screening in the Spine Clinic

Correlations among Cervical, Thoracic, and lumbar Hounsfield Unit measurements for assessment of bone mineral density

Bone mineral density measurements derived from dual-layer spectral CT enable opportunistic screening for osteoporosis

CT Measurement and Analysis of the Target Vertebral Body in Elderly Patients with Uncompressed Osteoporotic Thoracolumbar Fractures

Nonquantitative CT scan Hounsfield unit as a determinant of cervical spine bone density

Hounsfield Unit for Evaluating Bone Mineral Density and Strength: Variations in Measurement Methods.

Prediction of Osteoporosis from Proximal Femoral Cortical Bone Thickness and Hounsfield Unit Value with Clinical Significance.

Hounsfield Unit Values as an Adjunct Diagnostic Tool: Investigating its Relationship with Bone Mineral Density and Vertebral Bone Quality in Lumbar Degenerative Disease Patients.

The influence of proliferative tissue on Hounsfield unit and its correlation with BMD in middle-aged and elderly patients with lumbar degenerative diseases

Biomechanical Analysis of Diffuse Idiopathic Skeletal Hyperostosis and Osteoporosis: Vertebral Fracture Risk Evaluation Using Finite Element Modeling with Clinical and Micro-CT Data in an Elderly Donor

Reliability of Hounsfield Unit for Assessing Asymmetrical Vertebral Bone Mass in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

Validation of Asynchronous Quantitative Bone Densitometry of the Spine: Accuracy, Short-Term Reproducibility, and a Comparison with Conventional Quantitative Computed Tomography

Diagnostic efficacy of Hounsfield units in spine CT for the assessment of real bone mineral density of degenerative spine: correlation study between T-scores determined by DEXA scan and Hounsfield units from CT

In vivo determination of bone structure in postmenopausal women: a comparison of HR-pQCT and high-field MR imaging

Correlation analysis of the vertebral compression degree and CT Hounsfield units in elderly patients with osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures

Quantitative computed tomography has higher sensitivity detecting critical bone mineral density compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in postmenopausal women and elderly men with osteoporotic fractures: a real-life study

Long-Term Reproducibility of BMD-Measurements with Clinical QCT Using Simultaneous and Asynchronous Calibration Methods and Different Measurement and Reconstruction Protocols