Arabidopsis Calmodulin-like Proteins CML13 and CML14 Interact with Calmodulin-Binding Transcriptional Activators and Function in Salinity Stress Response

Bryan Hau,Kyle Symonds,Howard Teresinski,Abby Janssen,Liam Duff,Milena Smith,Kirsten Benidickson,William Plaxton,Wayne A Snedden
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcad152
2024-02-15
Abstract:Eukaryotic cells use calcium ions (Ca2+) as second messengers, particularly in response to abiotic and biotic stresses. These signals are detected by Ca2+ sensor proteins, such as calmodulin (CaM), which regulate the downstream target proteins. Plants also possess many CaM-like proteins (CMLs), most of which remain unstudied. We recently demonstrated that Arabidopsis CML13 and CML14 interact with proteins containing isoleucine/glutamine (IQ) domains, including CaM-binding transcriptional activators (CAMTAs). Here, we show that CaM, CML13 and CML14 bind all six members of the Arabidopsis CAMTA family. Using a combination of in planta and in vitro protein-interaction assays, we tested 11 members of the CaM/CML family and demonstrated that only CaM, CML13 and CML14 bind to CAMTA IQ domains. CaM, CML13 and CML14 showed Ca2+-independent binding to the IQ region of CAMTA6 and CAMTA3, and CAMTA6 in vitro exhibited some specificity toward individual IQ domains within CAMTA6 in split-luciferase in planta assays. We show that cml13 mutants exhibited enhanced salinity tolerance during germination compared to wild-type plants, a phenotype similar to camta6 mutants. In contrast, plants overexpressing CML13-GFP or CML14-GFP in the wild-type background showed increased NaCl sensitivity. Under mannitol stress, cml13 mutants were more susceptible than camta6 mutants or wild-type plants. The phenotype of cml13 mutants could be rescued with the wild-type CML13 gene. Several salinity-marker genes under CAMTA6 control were similarly misregulated in both camta6 and cml13 mutants, further supporting a role for CML13 in CAMTA6 function. Collectively, our data suggest that CML13 and CML14 participate in abiotic stress signaling as CAMTA effectors.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?