Abstract:Background: Health research that significantly impacts global clinical practice and policy is often published in high-impact factor (IF) medical journals. These outlets play a pivotal role in the worldwide dissemination of novel medical knowledge. However, researchers identifying as women and those affiliated with institutions in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have been largely underrepresented in high-IF journals across multiple fields of medicine. To evaluate disparities in gender and geographical representation among authors who have published in any of five top general medical journals, we conducted scientometric analyses using a large-scale dataset extracted from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Lancet, and Nature Medicine. Methods: Author metadata from all articles published in the selected journals between 2007 and 2022 were collected using the DimensionsAI platform. The Genderize.io API was then utilized to infer each author's likely gender based on their extracted first name. The World Bank country classification was used to map countries associated with researcher affiliations to the LMIC or the high-income country (HIC) category. We characterized the overall gender and country income category representation across the medical journals. In addition, we computed article-level diversity metrics and contrasted their distributions across the journals. Findings: We studied 151,536 authors across 49,764 articles published in five top medical journals, over a long period spanning 15 years. On average, approximately one-third (33.1%) of the authors of a given paper were inferred to be women; this result was consistent across the journals we studied. Further, 86.6% of the teams were exclusively composed of HIC authors; in contrast, only 3.9% were exclusively composed of LMIC authors. The probability of serving as the first or last author was significantly higher if the author was inferred to be a man (18.1% vs 16.8%, P < .01) or was affiliated with an institution in a HIC (16.9% vs 15.5%, P < .01). Our primary finding reveals that having a diverse team promotes further diversity, within the same dimension (i.e., gender or geography) and across dimensions. Notably, papers with at least one woman among the authors were more likely to also involve at least two LMIC authors (11.7% versus 10.4% in baseline, P < .001; based on inferred gender); conversely, papers with at least one LMIC author were more likely to also involve at least two women (49.4% versus 37.6%, P < .001; based on inferred gender). Conclusion: We provide a scientometric framework to assess authorship diversity. Our research suggests that the inclusiveness of high-impact medical journals is limited in terms of both gender and geography. We advocate for medical journals to adopt policies and practices that promote greater diversity and collaborative research. In addition, our findings offer a first step towards understanding the composition of teams conducting medical research globally and an opportunity for individual authors to reflect on their own collaborative research practices and possibilities to cultivate more diverse partnerships in their work.

Effects of subacute treatment with toluene on cerebrocortical alpha- and beta-adrenergic receptors in the rat. Evidence for an increased number and a reduced affinity of beta-adrenergic receptors.

Gender and Geographical Representation on Editorial Board Members of Medical Informatics Journals

Gender Diversity in AI Research

Gender and geographic representation in editorial boards of education journals

Gender-Specific Patterns in the Artificial Intelligence Scientific Ecosystem

Authorship gender among articles about artificial intelligence in breast imaging

Gender inequality and self-publication patterns among scientific editors

Does diversity beget diversity? A scientometric analysis of over 150,000 studies and 49,000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022

Assessing Drivers of Gender Balance and Racial Makeup of Editorial Board Members in Biomedical Engineering

Women, artificial intelligence, and key positions in collaboration networks: Towards a more equal scientific ecosystem

A scientometric analysis of fairness in health AI literature

Voices of Her: Analyzing Gender Differences in the AI Publication World

Female Models in AI and the Fight Against COVID-19

Gender imbalances among top-cited scientists across scientific disciplines over time through the analysis of nearly 5.8 million authors

Gender and research publishing in India: Uniformly high inequality?

Differential correction of gender imbalance for top-cited scientists across scientific subfields over time

Representation of women as editors in andrology journals

Temporal and geogrpahic trends in female representation within European cardiovascular imaging among 13,436 individuals associated with EACVI

The Gendered Lens of AI: Examining News Imagery Across Digital Spaces

Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals

A gender equality paradox in academic publishing: Countries with a higher proportion of female first-authored journal articles have larger first author gender disparities between fields