Abstract:Background: Health research that significantly impacts global clinical practice and policy is often published in high-impact factor (IF) medical journals. These outlets play a pivotal role in the worldwide dissemination of novel medical knowledge. However, researchers identifying as women and those affiliated with institutions in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) have been largely underrepresented in high-IF journals across multiple fields of medicine. To evaluate disparities in gender and geographical representation among authors who have published in any of five top general medical journals, we conducted scientometric analyses using a large-scale dataset extracted from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM), Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), The British Medical Journal (BMJ), The Lancet, and Nature Medicine. Methods: Author metadata from all articles published in the selected journals between 2007 and 2022 were collected using the DimensionsAI platform. The Genderize.io API was then utilized to infer each author's likely gender based on their extracted first name. The World Bank country classification was used to map countries associated with researcher affiliations to the LMIC or the high-income country (HIC) category. We characterized the overall gender and country income category representation across the medical journals. In addition, we computed article-level diversity metrics and contrasted their distributions across the journals. Findings: We studied 151,536 authors across 49,764 articles published in five top medical journals, over a long period spanning 15 years. On average, approximately one-third (33.1%) of the authors of a given paper were inferred to be women; this result was consistent across the journals we studied. Further, 86.6% of the teams were exclusively composed of HIC authors; in contrast, only 3.9% were exclusively composed of LMIC authors. The probability of serving as the first or last author was significantly higher if the author was inferred to be a man (18.1% vs 16.8%, P < .01) or was affiliated with an institution in a HIC (16.9% vs 15.5%, P < .01). Our primary finding reveals that having a diverse team promotes further diversity, within the same dimension (i.e., gender or geography) and across dimensions. Notably, papers with at least one woman among the authors were more likely to also involve at least two LMIC authors (11.7% versus 10.4% in baseline, P < .001; based on inferred gender); conversely, papers with at least one LMIC author were more likely to also involve at least two women (49.4% versus 37.6%, P < .001; based on inferred gender). Conclusion: We provide a scientometric framework to assess authorship diversity. Our research suggests that the inclusiveness of high-impact medical journals is limited in terms of both gender and geography. We advocate for medical journals to adopt policies and practices that promote greater diversity and collaborative research. In addition, our findings offer a first step towards understanding the composition of teams conducting medical research globally and an opportunity for individual authors to reflect on their own collaborative research practices and possibilities to cultivate more diverse partnerships in their work.

Gender imbalances among top-cited scientists across scientific disciplines over time through the analysis of nearly 5.8 million authors

Differential correction of gender imbalance for top-cited scientists across scientific subfields over time

Gender disparities in high-quality research revealed by Nature Index journals

Gender gap among highly cited researchers, 2014–2021

Gender Disparity in Citations in High-Impact Journal Articles

Gender differences in scientific careers: A large-scale bibliometric analysis

The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists

Young Male and Female Scientists: A Quantitative Exploratory Study of the Changing Demographics of the Global Scientific Workforce

Academic medicine’s glass ceiling: Author’s gender in top three medical research journals impacts probability of future publication success

Gender, Age, and Broader Impact: A Study of Persons, Not Just Authors.

Does diversity beget diversity? A scientometric analysis of over 150,000 studies and 49,000 authors published in high-impact medical journals between 2007 and 2022

A gender equality paradox in academic publishing: Countries with a higher proportion of female first-authored journal articles have larger first author gender disparities between fields

Historical comparison of gender inequality in scientific careers across countries and disciplines

Gender differences in faculty rank among academic physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Gender differences in research areas and topics: An analysis of publications in 285 fields

Gender Gap in Natural Language Processing Research: Disparities in Authorship and Citations

Trends in Female Authorship in Major Journals of 3 Oncology Disciplines, 2002-2018

A 20-year analysis of gender trends in oncology authorship in the Cochrane database of systematic reviews

Gender gaps at the academies

Evidence of Gender Disparities in Citations and Altmetric Attention Score in Oncology

Trends in gender of authors of original research in oncology among major medical journals: a retrospective bibliometric study