Compiling Concurrent Rewriting onto the Rewrite Rule Machine

H. Aida,J. Goguen,J. Meseguer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-54317-1_101

1990-06-11

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Xiangping Chen,Yiyu Zhuang,Lijie Qiao,Jun Chen,Yuewen Lao,Li Wang,Xiaoyan Gong,Xuehua He,Liping Zhou,Xin Qian,Jin Cui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.08.003

2019-01-01

Abstract:Objective To translate and revise the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS) into Chinese, then to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of AITCS. Methods The Chinese version of AITCS was translated from the original one, back-translated and adjusted for cultural adaptation. The reliability and validity were tested among 288 nurses, 81 physicians, 25 respiratory therapists, 10 physical therapists and 3 nutritionists from a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou using convenience sampling. Results The average of scale-level content validity index was 0.98, unanimity of scale-level content validity index was 0.84 and item-level content validity index was 0.89-1.00. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three common factors,which explained 61.427％ of the total variance,and each item had high factor loading quality (>0.4). The correlations coefficients between each dimension score and the total score ranged from 0.801 to 0.898 (P<0.05),and the correlations coefficients between each dimension score ranged from 0.607 to 0.698 (P<0.05). The Cronbach α of AITCS was 0.909, split-half reliability was 0.835 and test-retest reliability was 0.763. Conclusion TheChinese version of the AITCS has been proved to be reliable and valid. It is a valuable tool for evaluating interprofessional team collaboration among the health professional providers in mainland China.
Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Barriers to Enteral Feeding Critically Ill Patients Questionnaire

Jingying HUANG,Yiyu ZHUANG,Xiangping CHEN,Lili YANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2017.05.006

2017-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To translate Barriers to Enteral Feeding Critically Ill Patients Questionnaire, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: English version of the questionnaire was translated and back-translated according to Brislin translation model. The reliability and validity of the final Chinese version of the questionnaire was tested on a sample of 545 ICU nurses (345 in Hangzhou tertiary grade A hospital) in Zhejiang Province. Results: Chinese version of the questionnaire included 19 items and 3 subscales. Three factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, which could explain 69.084% of total variance. The Cronbach's α coefficient (0.875) and test-retest reliability (0.825) was acceptable. The range of item-level content validity index (I-CVI) was from 0.88 to 1.00. The average of scale-level content validity index (S-CVI/Ave) was 0.98. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that all obtained fit values were satisfactory with Chi-square/degrees of freedom 2.110, Root Mean Square Residual 0.150, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation 0.075, Goodness-of-Fit Index 0.853, Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index 0.812, Tucker-Lewis Index 0.835, Incremental Fit Index 0.859, Comparative Fit Index 0.856, and Parsimony Goodness of Fit Index 0.669. Conclusions: Chinese version of the questionnaire is reliable and valid, and is an effective tool to assess enteral feeding among critically ill patients.
Long-term Hypotensive Effect of Atenolol (ICI 66.082), a New β-adrenergic Blocking Agent

L. Hansson,B. E. Karlberg,H. Aberg,A. Westerlund,S. Jameson,Henningsen Nc

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.0954-6820.1976.TB06729.X

2009-04-24

Abstract:A report is given from an on-going multicenter trial in Sweden, in which 117 hypertensive patients have been treated with a new cardioselective beta-adrenergic blocking agent, atenolol (ICI 66.082, Tenormin) for an average of six months (range 2-21). Statistically significant reductions of BP were observed, recumbent by 29/19 mmHg (p less than 0.0001) and standing by 28/18 mmHg (p less than 0.0001). Few and comparatively mild side-effects were seen.
Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): assessment of reliability and validity

Juan Li,Lanshu Zhou,Daqiao Zhu,Chen Hu,Xiaoyun Zhang,Yan Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.05.017

Abstract:Background: The nursing students' perceptions of instructor caring (NSPIC) is an instrument to assess the influence of caring interactions between students and faculty on students' ability to care. However, the validity and reliability of the Chinese version has not yet been studied. Objectives: The study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of NSPIC (C-NSPIC). Design: This is a cross-sectional study. Setting: The study was performed in three Tertiary Grade A (top level in China) and teaching hospitals in Shanghai, China. Participants: The participants of the study are nursing students during clinical practice. Methods: The English version of nursing students' perception of instructor caring scale was professionally translated into Chinese and a pilot test was undertaken to ensure the equivalence of meaning and cultural appropriateness. The content validity of the C-NSPIC was examined by a panel of eight experts, and test-retest was conducted to assess the item reliabilities of the scale. A convenience sampling method was used to recruit nursing students. A first sample (N=256) was recruited to explore the factorial structure of the C-NSPIC using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and a validation sample (N=358) was recruited to confirm the findings from the EFA using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). SPSS version 16.0 was used for the EFA and Amos 17.0 was used for the CFA. Results: The Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the C-NSPIC was 0.933. The test-retest reliability was satisfactory, with the ICC scores for each item ranging from 0.603 to 0.962. The overall content validity index was 0.96. Five factors (control versus flexibility, supportive learning climate, confidence through caring, appreciation of life meaning and respectful sharing) were identified in EFA, which was consistent with that of the original English version, and were confirmed by CFA. Conclusion: The C-NSPIC can serve as a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the nursing students' perception of instructor caring in China, which may help to improve the nursing students' caring ability in China.
Psychometric evaluation of the student nurse stressor-14 scale for undergraduate nursing interns

Jingjing Ding,Yang Yu,Jie Kong,Qing Chen,Patricia McAleer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01631-z

2023-12-08

Abstract:Background: Currently, there are few scales used to assess the stressors experienced by undergraduate nursing interns during clinical practice, and the assessment of stressors during clinical practice is not comprehensive; the scale includes some unique stressors during training that is not available in the existing instruments used to assess nursing student practice stress in China. Aim: The study aimed to explore the structure of the Chinese revision of the Student Nurse Stressor-14 Scale(SNS-14-CHI)and investigate the psychometric properties it among Chinese undergraduate nursing interns. Methods: The original scale was culturally adjusted and revised after expert correspondence on the entries, and 414 undergraduate nursing interns were recruited from three cities in China to administer the questionnaire. Reliability was measured by internal consistency, fold-half reliability, and stability. Content validity was evaluated using exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess the validity of the SNS-14-CHI. Results: The SNS-14-CHI retained 14 items, the EFA supported a 2-factor structure, and the items' factor attribution differed from the original scale. The CFA results showed a good model fit. The Cronbach coefficient of the scale was 0.934, and the coefficient values of the two factors were 0.890 and 0.898. The content validity index of the scale was 0.964.The cumulative variance contribution of the 2-factor structure was 60.445%. The split-half reliability and stability were 0.869,0.762, respectively. Conclusion: The SNS-14-CHI has excellent reliability and validity among undergraduate nursing trainees. The evaluation results of the scale can provide a reference for nursing managers to develop educational programs and interventions to quantify nursing student stress.
[Biologic markers and prediction of response to treatment in depression].

P. Uytdenhoef,P. Linkowski,J. Mendlewicz

1982-05-01

Abstract:
Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control and Intention to Pursue a Career in Mental Health Nursing Scale

Yi Zeng,Mei Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103930

IF: 3.43

2024-02-27

Nurse Education in Practice

Abstract:Aim To adapt culturally and assess the reliability and validity of the Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control and Intention to Pursue a Career in Mental Health Nursing (ASPIRE) scale among Chinese nursing students. Background Mental health nurses make up a substantial proportion of the mental health workforce and are pivotal for improving access to professional mental health care. However, a shortage of mental health nurses persists across various countries. Although new nursing graduates have the potential to alleviate the labor shortages, there is currently no standardized tool specifically designed to measure nursing students' intentions to pursue a career in mental health nursing in China. Design A quantitative and cross-sectional design. Methods Following email authorization from the author, the Chinese version of the ASPIRE scale was translated following the cross-cultural adaptation process guidelines established by the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS). A questionnaire survey was conducted among 540 nursing students from three universities in Hunan Province from April 2023 to October 2023. Nine experts were invited to evaluate the content equivalence of each item. Item analysis, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability were used to test reliability and validity. Results The Chinese version of the ASPIRE scale retained 14 items and it has high content validity. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the correlation between the total scores of the items (P < 0.001). Exploratory factor analysis indicated that the one-factor solution explained 65.82% of the total variance and confirmatory factor analysis results indicated a good fit (CMIN/DF = 2.64, RMSEA = 0.079, GFI = 0.908, IFI = 0.964, SRMR = 0.0326). The Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the scale was 0.958 and the test-retest coefficient was 0.783. Conclusion The Chinese version of the ASPIRE scale has great reliability and validity and can be used for assessing Chinese nursing students' intention to pursue a career in mental health nursing.

nursing
The Chinese version of the Nursing Student Academic Resilience Inventory: A validity and reliability study

Lin Yu,Lei Liu,Xiaoting Sun,Jianmei Gong,Min Zang,Jiao Xie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104162

2024-10-10

Abstract:Aim: To translate and adapt the Nursing Student Academic Resilience Inventory (NSARI) into Chinese and assess its validity and reliability among Chinese nursing students. Background: Nursing students frequently encounter stress during their clinical education and academic resilience is an important skill to help students withstand stress. The NSARI is a valid and reliable tool for assessing the level of academic resilience of nursing students during clinical practice. Currently, there is no valid and reliable measurement tool to assess academic resilience for nursing students in China. Design: A descriptive, methodological and cross-sectional design was used. Method: This study was conducted on 600 nursing students in Northeast China. A socio-demographic form, the Chinese version of the NSARI and the nurse resilience scale were used for data collection between May to November 2023. The exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis samples comprised 300 students, respectively, to test the structural validity of the inventory. In addition, internal consistency and invariance analyses were conducted to assess the reliability of the inventory. Results: The Chinese version of NSARI comprises 24 items separated into six dimensions. Exploratory factor analysis extracted six factors, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 71.908 %. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a satisfactory fit. Cronbach's alpha coefficient for the internal consistency of the total inventory was 0.939 with a test-retest stability reliability value of 0.957. Conclusion: The Chinese version of NSARI is a valid and reliable measurement tool for assessing the level of academic resilience of nursing students during clinical placement.
TUMORS OF THE MANDIBLE IN CHILDREN

R. Richardson,D. Robinson,F. Masters

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-195906000-00002

1959-06-01

Abstract:
Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the spiritual care-giving scale in nursing undergraduates and its application

Ying Huang,Dan Lv,Tao Wang,Haoran Zhang,Lei Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.9021

2024-10-18

Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese Version of the Spiritual Care-giving Scale (C-SCGS) in nursing undergraduates and its application. Methods: This was a retrospective study. A questionnaire survey was conducted among 262 senior nursing undergraduates from Chengde Medical University, China from May to June, 2023 through convenience sampling method. The C-SCGS and the general demographic data table were employed to investigate the subjects. Results: The C-SCGS retained 34 items, and four common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis, with a cumulative contribution rate of 65.15%. The I-CVI value of the scale was 0.88-1.0, and the S-CVI/Ave value was 0.94. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the total scale was 0.957, that of each dimension ranged from 0.850 to 0.944, with a split-half coefficient of 0.887. Conclusion: The C-SCGS may be used to evaluate the spiritual cognition of Chinese nursing undergraduates by virtue of its good reliability and validity. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.9021 How to cite this: Huang Y, Lv D, Wang T, Zhang H, Zhang L. Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the spiritual care-giving scale in nursing undergraduates and its application. Pak J Med Sci. 2024;40(10):2313-2318. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.40.10.9021 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

medicine, general & internal
Quandaries in the application of the ICNIRP low frequency basic restriction on current density

P. Dimbylow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/53/1/009

IF: 3.5

2008-01-07

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Abstract:This paper identifies uncertainties and problems in the practical application of the ICNIRP low frequency basic restriction on current density. This quantity should be averaged over a cross-section of 1 cm2 perpendicular to the current direction. The rationale and the sensitivity of the current density average are investigated. There are difficulties in finding a square centimetre of spinal cord over which to average. The consequences of including neighbouring tissues in the averages are investigated in the male and female voxel models NORMAN and NAOMI for applied uniform electric and magnetic fields at 50 Hz. Also the case of the non-uniform magnetic field from a horizontal current carrying conductor adjacent to the back of the body is investigated. The maximum and 99th percentile current density values are compared with the 1 cm2 average in the derivation of external field reference levels. For more information on this article, see medicalphysicsweb.org
The Chinese Version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN): Assessment of Reliability and Validity.

Yu-Ying Xiao,Ting Li,Lin Xiao,Su-Wei Wang,Si-Qi Wang,Han-Xiao Wang,Bei-Bei Wang,Yu-Lin Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.013

IF: 3.906

2016-01-01

Nurse Education Today

Abstract:Background: Professional attitude is of great importance for nursing talents in the modern society. To develop an effective educational program for student nurses in China, an appropriate instrument is required for the assessment of their professional attitude.Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of the Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN) in Chinese version.Methods: The original version of IPASN was translated through Brislin model (translation, back translation, culture adaption and pilot study) with the authorization from the developer. A total of 681 nursing students were chosen by stratified convenience sampling to assess construct validity using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Besides, item analysis, Cronbach's alpha coefficients, test-retest reliability were conducted to test the psychometric properties in this part. A total of 204 nursing undergraduate trainees were selected by cluster convenience sampling to confirm the structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in another time.Results: Corrected item-total correlations, alpha if item deleted were between 0.33 and 0.69, 0.906 and 0.913, respectively, indicating no item should be deleted. Cronbach alpha value was 0.91 for the total scale and Cronbach alpha coefficient for subscales ranged from 0.67 to 0.89. Test-retest reliability estimated from intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.74 (P < 0.05). Differences in item scores between the high-score group (the first 27%) and low-score group (the last 27%) were significant (P < 0.001), indicating that the item discrimination ability was good. Seven subscales (contribution to increase of scientific information load, autonomy, community service, continuous education, to promote professional development, cooperation and theory guiding practice) were identified in EFA and confirmed in CFA, and explained 65.5% of the total variance.Conclusion: It indicated that the Chinese version of IPASN was valid and reliable for the evaluation of nursing students' professional attitude. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
A new scale for older resident satisfaction with residential integrated care in China: Development and validation

Zhihan Liu,Zhiqi Li,Jiaheng Zhang,Qiuping Feng,Juan Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.04.023

IF: 2.525

2024-05-04

Geriatric Nursing

Abstract:The factors that affect resident satisfaction with emerging residential integrated care for older people in China have been unclear due to a lack of validated instruments. Based on psychometric assessment procedures, we developed a new scale for older resident satisfaction with residential integrated care (SORSRIC). The scale was developed using a two-step process and a sample of 16 Chinese institutions and 333 residents. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate reliability and validity. Principal component analysis and maximum variance methods were used to orthogonally rotate the items to extract seven factors. These were: resident expectations, perceived quality (physical care), perceived quality (mental care), perceived value, resident satisfaction, resident complaints, and resident loyalty. The CR value of each dimension of the pre-tested, formal scale was greater than 0.80, and the AVE value was greater than 0.50. This 24-item instrument showed good reliability and structural validity and can be applied to improve the experience and outcomes for older people in residential care.

nursing,geriatrics & gerontology,gerontology
Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Self-awareness Scale for Nurses

Qing Chen,Chunguang Liang,Jing Lu,Zhaoquan Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1352983

IF: 5.2

2024-04-17

Frontiers in Public Health

Abstract:Background Levels of self-awareness may affect the decision-making ability of clinical nurses and may also be related to mental health. Therefore, it is crucial to develop tools to identify nurses’ level of self-awareness. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of a short scale among Chinese nurses and to explore the factors associated with nurses’ self-awareness. Methods A total of 957 participants were recruited, 549 participants were used for reliability tests and 408 subjects were used for impact factor studies. They completed the General Information Questionnaire, the Self-Awareness Scale for Nurses, and the Psychological Distress Scale. Exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, Cronbach’s alpha, and retest reliability were used to investigate the psychometric properties of the Self-Awareness Scale for Nurses. Multiple regression analyses were used in this study to investigate the relationship between nurses’ self-awareness and the independent variables. Results A 4-factor model of the Chinese version of the Self-Awareness Scale for Nurses was validated. The overall Cronbach’s alpha value for the Chinese version of the Self-Awareness Scale for Nurses was 0.873. Cronbach’s alpha values for each subscale ranged from 0.808 to 0.979. Significant predictors of each dimension of the Self-awareness and the total score of the scale were age and work experience. Conclusion The Chinese version of the Self-Awareness Scale for Nurses is a valid and reliable scale.

public, environmental & occupational health
Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the metacognitive awareness scale among nursing students

Shasha Li,Jun Xu,Xuejing Jia,Yanjun Zhao,Xiaojing Liu,Yuecong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1354810

IF: 3.8

2024-05-17

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Objective: This study endeavors to translate and psycho-metrically validate the metacognitive awareness inventory scale (MAS) for nursing students in China. Method: A total of 592 nursing students were enlisted from four universities situated in the eastern, southern, western, and northern regions of China. Content validity and reliability were evaluated using the content validity index and item-total correlation coefficient, and Cronbach's alpha coefficients, respectively. Convergent validity examined the goodness of fit among sub-scales through the average extracted variance and composite reliability. Results: Exploratory factor analysis confirmed the first-order and second-order factor models, contributing to a cumulative variance of 89.4 and 59.5%, respectively. The Cronbach's alpha values were 0.963 and 0.801, respectively. Confirmatory factor analysis outcomes indicated an excellent overall fit index for the model, satisfying the convergent validity criteria and achieving a target coefficient of 96.0%, which is consistent with the original scale structure. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the MAS (C-MAS) is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing metacognitive awareness among Chinese nursing students. Further research should consider a broader sample of nursing students across China to reinforce the scale's applicability.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Moral resilience in registered nurses: Cultural adaption and validation study

Xu Tian,Qiaoling He,Xiaoling Liu,Xiuni Gan,María F Jiménez Herrera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330231196229

IF: 3.344

2023-09-20

Nursing Ethics

Abstract:Nursing Ethics, Ahead of Print. BackgroundHealthcare professionals, especially professional nurses, experience various types of moral suffering due to inevitable ethical conflicts. Moral resilience is recently proposed as a resource to address moral suffering. However, there is no tool to measure moral resilience in Chinese professional nurses.AimThis study aimed to translate the Rushton Moral Resilience Scale (RMRS) into Chinese and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of RMRS (Chi-RMRS).Research designA methodological and descriptive research design.Participants and research contextA convenience sample of 411 Chinese professional nurses was recruited through an online survey platform between February and March 2023.Ethical considerationsThis study was approved by the Research Ethics Committees of the University and hospitals involved.ResultsThe RMRS was translated and culturally adapted into a Chinese version. Neither floor nor ceiling effects were observed. The scale-level content validity index (CVI) was 0.922 with the item-level CVIs ranging from 0.833 to 1.000. The explanatory factor analysis (EFA) generated a three-factor structure for the Chi-RMRS, and the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) demonstrated the three-factor structure with factor loadings for each item ranging from 0.42 to 0.80. The scale-level Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.811 with each dimension ranging from 0.717 to 0.821, and composite reliability (CR) coefficient for the overall scale was 0.920, with each dimension varying from 0.739 to 0.824. The standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC) were 3.522 and 9.763, respectively.DiscussionThe Chi-RMRS is able to measure moral resilience of Chinese professional nurses, and has good validity and reliability. It can be used in research and practice to determine the level of moral resilience, thus helping nursing managers to monitor the status of Chinese professional nurses, then develop interventions to maintain the well-being of professional nurses and to ensure quality of care.

nursing,ethics
Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

Haoyue Luo,Qiufang Li,Rui Xu,Shuangrong Han,Jiayin Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.04.003

IF: 2.356

2024-05-12

Pain Management Nursing

Abstract:Background The Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale (NCPMCS) is a tool to explore nurses' competencies and subjective experiences in cancer pain management, and to help nurses understand their current shortcomings in cancer pain management. The scale, currently available only in English and translated into Chinese for wider adoption abroad, provides a tool for Chinese nurses to assess their level of cancer pain management. Furthermore, based on the scale's specific score, they can evaluate their lack of understanding about cancer pain management, advance research into this area, and enhance their capacity to control cancer pain while providing patient care. Objective The purpose of this study was to translate and localize the new scale, and to measure its reliability and validity. The study was also to provide a way to quickly and accurately measure the competency of cancer pain management among nursing staff in China. Methods The Bristling translation approach was used to translate, translate back, and culturally modify the English version of the cancer pain management competency scale for nurses to create the Chinese version. A convenience sample was used for the study, 220 clinical nurses from three Grade III hospitals in Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China, were chosen by convenience sampling. The Chinese version of the scale was used for this investigation. Results The Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale for Nurses has 14 items over 4 dimensions in its Chinese form. From the exploratory factor analysis, four common components were recovered; the cumulative variance rate was 81.994%, the scale's Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.902, and the Cronbach's α coefficient for each dimension ranged from 0.800 to 0.938. Retest reliability was 0.915, scale content validity was 0.865, and Spearman-Brown's broken half reliability was 0.808. Conclusion Nurses' cancer pain management competency in clinics can be assessed using the Chinese version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale, which has strong validity and reliability.

nursing
Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Decision Regret Scale

Richard Huan Xu,Ling Ming Zhou,Eliza Laiyi Wong,Dong Wang,Jing Hui Chang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.583574

IF: 3.8

2020-12-03

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the decision regret scale (DRSc). Methods The data of 704 patients who completed the DRSc were used for the analyses. We evaluated the construct, convergent/discriminant, and known-group validity; internal consistency and test–retest reliability; and the item invariance of the DRSc. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was employed to confirm the optimal cutoff point of the scale. Results A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) indicated that a one-factor model fits the data. The internal consistency (α = 0.74) and test–retest reliability [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.71] of the DRSc were acceptable. The DRSc demonstrated unidimensionality and invariance for use across the sexes. It was confirmed that an optimal cutoff point of 25 could discriminate between patients with high and low decisional regret during clinical practice. Conclusion The DRSc is a parsimonious instrument that can be used to measure the uncertainty inherent in medical decisions. It can be employed to provide knowledge, offer support, and elicit patient preferences in an attempt to promote shared decision-making.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Examining the dimensionality, reliability, and invariance of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale-14: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Chinese junior nurses

Weidong Zhao,Ting Shu,Yue Ma,Xuemei Wei,Cairong Zhu,Liping Peng,Lihong Zhao,Qin Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.964151

IF: 4.7

2022-11-04

Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract:Background: This study aimed to present the psychometric properties (dimensionality, reliability, and invariance) of the Chinese 14-Item Resilience Scale (RS-14) within Chinese register nurses (RNs) with less than 3 years work experiences. And we aimed to compare the fit of a unidimensional model and a bifactor model. Materials and methods: This multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to September in 2019. A total of 7,231 registered nurses from 90 hospitals were recruited. Data was anonymously obtained through online questionnaires. Both reliability and validity of Chinese RS-14 were assessed. The confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were used to compare the fit of two different factor structures of the RS-14 (unidimensional model vs. a bifactor model). Moreover, multigroup CFA (MGCFA) were applied to evaluate the measurement invariance (MI) across sociodemographic parameters (gender, educational level, marital status, and et al.). Design: Cross-sectional quantitative analyses. Results: Our study confirmed that the bifactor model presented the best fit within Chinese nurses (CFI = 0.924, TLI = 0.909, RMSEA = 0.095, SRMR = 0.043), and found strong factorial invariance across gender, marital status, and status of receiving standardized training. The reliability of RS-14 was high with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.939. Moreover, RS-14 was positively correlated with the social support and was negatively correlated with workplace bullying. Conclusion: This is the first study to explore the latent factor structure for the RS-14 among Chinese RNs and evaluated MI across a series of sociodemographic variables. Based on our findings, the Chinese version RS-14 is both valid and reliable.

psychiatry
Transcript and metabolite profiling in cell cultures of 18 plant species that produce benzylisoquinoline alkaloids.

S. Farrow,J. M. Hagel,P. Facchini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.02.014

IF: 3.8

2012-05-01

Phytochemistry

Abstract:

Compiling Concurrent Rewriting onto the Rewrite Rule Machine

Translation, Revision and Assessment of Reliability and Validity of the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale

Reliability and validity of Chinese version of Barriers to Enteral Feeding Critically Ill Patients Questionnaire

Long-term Hypotensive Effect of Atenolol (ICI 66.082), a New β-adrenergic Blocking Agent

Chinese version of the nursing students' perception of instructor caring (C-NSPIC): assessment of reliability and validity

Psychometric evaluation of the student nurse stressor-14 scale for undergraduate nursing interns

[Biologic markers and prediction of response to treatment in depression].

Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Attitudes, Subjective Norms, Perceived Behavioural Control and Intention to Pursue a Career in Mental Health Nursing Scale

The Chinese version of the Nursing Student Academic Resilience Inventory: A validity and reliability study

TUMORS OF THE MANDIBLE IN CHILDREN

Reliability and validity test of the Chinese version of the spiritual care-giving scale in nursing undergraduates and its application

Quandaries in the application of the ICNIRP low frequency basic restriction on current density

The Chinese Version of Instrument of Professional Attitude for Student Nurses (IPASN): Assessment of Reliability and Validity.

A new scale for older resident satisfaction with residential integrated care in China: Development and validation

Translation and validation of the Chinese version of the Self-awareness Scale for Nurses

Translation and psychometric validation of the Chinese version of the metacognitive awareness scale among nursing students

Moral resilience in registered nurses: Cultural adaption and validation study

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Nurses' Cancer Pain Management Competency Scale

Psychometric Evaluation of the Chinese Version of the Decision Regret Scale

Examining the dimensionality, reliability, and invariance of the Chinese version of the Resilience Scale-14: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Chinese junior nurses

Transcript and metabolite profiling in cell cultures of 18 plant species that produce benzylisoquinoline alkaloids.