Abstract:Marlana M Ray, 1 Jennifer Yeung, 1 Jonathan Hoehn, 2 Matthew Valenti, 3 Kelsey E Lewis, 1 Rachel N Pauls, 1 Catrina C Crisp 1 1 Urogynecology Division, TriHealth, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 2 Hatton Research Institute, TriHealth, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 3 OB/GYN Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA Correspondence: Marlana M Ray, TriHealth, Urogynecology Division, 3219 Clifton Ave, Medical Office Building Suite 100, Cincinnati, OH, 45220, USA, Email Purpose: Studies involving minimally invasive hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy have demonstrated safety and feasibility of same-day discharge. There are limited data, however, on same-day discharge outcomes for vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic reconstruction. This study aimed to compare 30 and 90-day surgical outcomes between same-day discharge versus overnight stay following vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension. Patients and Methods: This retrospective study evaluated surgeries performed over two time periods. Overnight stay was standard between December 2018 and February 2020. Same-day discharge was standard from December 2020 to February 2022. All patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension were included. The primary outcome was to determine if there was an increase in 30-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits and reoperations within 30 days, the previous variables at 90 days, and the rate for successful same-day discharge. Results: A total of 324 patients were analyzed over the 30 months: 149 (46%) in the overnight stay group and 175 (54%) in the same-day discharge group. At 30 days, no difference was found between groups for readmissions (2.7% vs 4.0%, p = 0.56), emergency department visits (14.8% vs 14.9%, p = 1.0), or reoperations (2.0% vs.1.7%, p = 1.0). At 90 days, outcomes were also similar. Same-day discharge as standard practice was successful in 80% of patients. Conclusion: In this retrospective two cohort study, the safety of same-day discharge following vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension was demonstrated with no increased risk of 30 or 90-day readmissions, emergency visits, or reoperation rates. The majority (80%) of patients were discharged on the day of surgery, suggesting feasibility of this model. Keywords: female pelvic reconstructive surgery, urogynecology, vaginal prolapse repair, pelvic floor surgery Approximately 600,000 hysterectomies are performed annually, making this procedure one of the most common major gynecologic procedures. 1 Of the various approaches, vaginal hysterectomy has been shown to have fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and faster recovery. 2,3 Recently, same-day discharge (SDD) following minimally invasive vaginal hysterectomy has gained acceptance. 4 When compared to inpatient vaginal hysterectomy, SDD has shown to be safe and feasible with similar or lower rates of postoperative complications. 5–7 Studies have also demonstrated success of SDD upwards of 96% with low rates of readmission and estimated blood loss (EBL). 6,7 There is now a growing body of evidence evaluating SDD after major urogynecologic procedures. 8–13 Results are conflicting regarding rates of readmission after SDD compared to overnight stay (OS), with one study reporting higher rates of readmission and others reporting no difference. 8,9 The majority of studies, however, have reviewed laparoscopic or robotic procedures. 10–12 Outcomes following vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic reconstruction with apical suspension are limited in number and sample size. 14,15 The objective of this study was to determine if SDD is safe and feasible for patients undergoing vaginal hysterectomy with pelvic reconstruction, including apical suspension. We also chose to extend the evaluation period by including outcomes up to 90 days postoperatively. In this TriHealth Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective, two cohort study, we evaluated outcomes following vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic reconstruction with apical suspension. Surgeries were performed over two time periods by three fellowship-trained, board-certified Urogynecologic surgeons at two Institution-affiliated hospitals. Time periods were chosen based on a shift in standard discharge practice due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Planned OS was standard prior to March 2020, at which time all elective procedures were halted. In order to resume elective surgeries, hospital policy required SDD to ensure hospital beds remained available to those requiring COVID-19 treatment. This requirement shifted standard discharge practice to SDD. Simi -Abstract Truncated-

Same‐day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign/premalignant disease: A multicentre randomised controlled trial

Same-day discharge protocol for laparoscopic treatment of adnexal disease: management and acceptance

Factors Associated with Same Day Discharge after Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology

Factors influencing same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy for malignant and non-malignant gynecological diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Same-day Discharge Following Vaginal Hysterectomy and Native-tissue Apical Repair for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Prospective Cohort Study

Perioperative Outcomes for Same- Versus Next-Day Discharge After Benign Vaginal Hysterectomy

Same-Day Discharge After a Minimally Invasive Colectomy: A Successful Approach to Patient Selection

Comparing the efficacy and safety of three surgical approaches for total hysterectomy (TSATH): protocol for a multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial

Short-Term Outcomes of Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus D2 Dissection in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Colon Cancer (RELARC Trial): A Multicentre Randomised Controlled Phase III Trial

Short-term Outcomes of Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus D2 Dissection in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colectomy for Right Colon Cancer (RELARC): a Randomised, Controlled, Phase 3, Superiority Trial

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for women with heavy menstrual bleeding (HEALTH): a parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial

Avoidable admissions after minimally invasive hysterectomy

Safety of gastric bypass with same-day discharge: a propensity score-matched analysis of the Dutch Audit for treatment of Obesity

Same-Day Discharge is Safe, Feasible Following Vaginal Hysterectomy with Apical Suspension

Minimally invasive outpatient hysterectomy for a benign indication: A systematic review

Effectiveness of an internet-based perioperative care programme to enhance postoperative recovery in gynaecological patients: cluster controlled trial with randomised stepped-wedge implementation

Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy compared with second-generation endometrial ablation for heavy menstrual bleeding: the HEALTH RCT

Patient Satisfaction and Experience with Same-Day Discharge After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Mixed-Methods study

The surgical stress response and postoperative immune function after laparoscopic or conventional total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer: a randomized trial

VaNoLaH trial: a study protocol--a multinational randomised controlled trial including two identical substudies comparing vaginal versus vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal surgery) hysterectomy or laparoscopic versus vNOTES hysterectomy

Same-Day Discharge for Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study