Abstract:Background: The Internet and social media offer promising ways to improve the reach, efficiency, and effectiveness of recruitment efforts at a reasonable cost, but raise unique ethical dilemmas. We describe how we used social media to recruit cancer patients and family caregivers for a research study, the ethical issues we encountered, and the strategies we developed to address them. Objective: Drawing on the principles of Privacy by Design (PbD), a globally recognized standard for privacy protection, we aimed to develop a PbD framework for online health research recruitment. Methods: We proposed a focus group study on the dietary behaviors of cancer patients and their families, and the role of Web-based dietary self-management tools. Using an established blog on our hospital website, we proposed publishing a recruitment post and sharing the link on our Twitter and Facebook pages. The Research Ethics Board (REB) raised concern about the privacy risks associated with our recruitment strategy; by clicking on a recruitment post, an individual could inadvertently disclose personal health information to third-party companies engaged in tracking online behavior. The REB asked us to revise our social media recruitment strategy with the following questions in mind: (1) How will you inform users about the potential for privacy breaches and their implications? and (2) How will you protect users from privacy breaches or inadvertently sharing potentially identifying information about themselves? Results: Ethical guidelines recommend a proportionate approach to ethics assessment, which advocates for risk mitigation strategies that are proportional to the magnitude and probability of risks. We revised our social media recruitment strategy to inform users about privacy risks and to protect their privacy, while at the same time meeting our recruitment objectives. We provide a critical reflection of the perceived privacy risks associated with our social media recruitment strategy and the appropriateness of the risk mitigation strategies that we employed by assessing their alignment with PbD and by discussing the following: (1) What are the potential risks and who is at risk? (2) Is cancer considered "sensitive" personal information? (3) What is the probability of online disclosure of a cancer diagnosis in everyday life? and (4) What are the public's expectations for privacy online and their views about online tracking, profiling, and targeting? We conclude with a PbD framework for online health research recruitment. Conclusions: Researchers, REBs, ethicists, students, and potential study participants are often unaware of the privacy risks of social media research recruitment and there is no official guidance. Our PbD framework for online health research recruitment is a resource for these wide audiences.

'That Sounds to Me Like You Are Making This Too Complicated …': Reflections on a Social Media Recruitment Effort for a Study on Masculinities and Contraception

Using Social Media to Recruit Participants in Health Care Research: Case Study

Recognizing and Overcoming Challenges of Couple Interview Research

Sex and the Fieldwork: Gender, Sexuality, Nationality, and Social Class in Research on European (Heterosexual) Men

Social Media Use for Research Participant Recruitment: Integrative Literature Review

Engaging Australian men in masculinity and suicide - A concept test of social media materials and a website

Sensemaking About Contraceptive Methods Across Online Platforms

Exploring barriers to care home research recruitment during the COVID-19 pandemic: The influence of social media recruitment posts and public sentiment

Using Social Media as a Research Recruitment Tool: Ethical Issues and Recommendations

Public attitudes towards social media field experiments

Participant recruitment for paediatric research using social media: A practical 'how-to' guide for researchers

Engaging Institutional Stakeholders to Develop and Implement Guidelines for Recruiting Participants in Research Studies Using Social Media: Mixed Methods, Multi-Phase Process

Conceptualisations of masculinity and sexual development among boys and young men in Korogocho slum in Kenya

Merits and Pitfalls of Social Media as a Platform for Recruitment of Study Participants

Operationalising masculinities in theories and practices of gender-transformative health interventions: a scoping review

Using social media for male sexual health: what do we miss? A perspective article on good practices and missing evidence

'Could you please pass one of those health leaflets along?': exploring health, morality and resistance through focus groups

Intentional and actional components of engaged participation in public health research studies: qualitative synthesis of a recruitment and retention process into the theory-informed INTACT-RS framework

Young Women’s Experiences of Health and Well-Being in a Postfeminist Social Media Culture: The MeStories Study Protocol

Ethics and Privacy Implications of Using the Internet and Social Media to Recruit Participants for Health Research: A Privacy-by-Design Framework for Online Recruitment

(389) Exploring The Link Between Conformity To Masculine Ideologies And Use Of Coercive And Coaxing Tactics Following Sexual Rejection