Inpatient Outcomes of Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia in Those With Aortic Stenosis: A Retrospective Study of 85,000 Hospitalizations

Mohammad Aldiabat,Yassine Kilani,Majd Alahmad,Laith Alhuneafat,Yazan Aljabiri,Ali Horoub,Khaled Alabdallah,Hebah Alrahamneh,Amar Manvar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001932
2024-09-01
Abstract:Goals: To investigate the outcomes of hospitalized patients with gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) in the setting of aortic stenosis (AS). Background: Although AS is associated with gastrointestinal arteriovenous malformations, its association with GAVE, a rare cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding, remains unknown. Study: The National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016 to 2019 was searched for patients admitted with a diagnosis of GAVE, with and without a history of AS. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the risk of mortality and in-hospital complications in the GAVE/AS group compared with the GAVE-only group. Results: Patients with AS had a 2-fold increase in the risk of GAVE [odds ratio (OR): 2.08, P < 0.001], with no statistically significant difference in inpatient mortality between the study groups (OR: 1.36, P = 0.268). Patients with GAVE-AS had a higher risk of hypovolemic shock (OR: 2.00, P = 0.001) and acute coronary syndromes (OR: 2.25, P < 0.001) with no difference in risk of cardiogenic shock ( P = 0.695), acute kidney injury ( P = 0.550), blood transfusion ( P = 0.270), sepsis ( P = 0.598), respiratory failure ( P = 0.200), or in-hospital cardiac arrest ( P = 0.638). The cost of care in patients with GAVE-AS was increased by a mean of $4729 ( P = 0.022), with no increase in length of stay ( P = 0.320) when compared with patients with GAVE-only. Conclusions: Patients with AS have a 2-fold increase in the risk of development of GAVE. Patients with AS admitted for GAVE-related bleeding are at higher rates of hypovolemic shock, acute coronary syndrome, and higher resource utilization when compared with admitted patients with GAVE without AS.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?