Abstract:In this issue of Acta Paediatrica, Sahm et al. report the results of a well-designed qualitative study on the knowledge, attitudes and beliefs about fever displayed by 21 Danish parents living in Copenhagen (1). Interestingly, the parents were recruited outside healthcare settings and included a larger proportion of fathers than is usual in such studies. The authors used semi-structured interviews, which were transcribed verbatim and carefully analysed. This methodology does not allow for generalisation of the findings beyond the group studied, but does allow for more in-depth analysis of parental beliefs than the more common questionnaire-based studies. The parents that participated in the study had important fever-related concerns, but poor basic knowledge of areas such as the definition of fever. They also used numerous sources of information, but needed reassurance regarding the trustworthiness of that information from healthcare practitioners. The authors concluded that further initiatives were needed to provide accessible information to parents, including integrated educational programmes to make the switch from fever phobia to rational evidence-based management (2). The term educate should probably be used with caution and replaced by guidance. In addition, we should not forget that parents are the experts when it comes to their child and they can often be the ones educating the healthcare practitioner. The results reported by Sahm et al. are generally in line with those reported by other observational studies in the last three to four decades, both in Western countries and in those with more limited resources (2–5). However, the most important differences between the Sahm et al. study and previous findings are that parents taking part in the latest study declared that fever was actually a good thing for the body and they were reluctant to use medicine to treat fever. This notion may indicate a favourable evolution of parents’ knowledge. However, this reluctance to use medicine was in part related to inappropriate reasons, such as a concern that medication was a major cause of autism. In addition, the parent’s attitudes in real life may differ from the views they expressed during the study interviews. Has the health practitioner community failed to provide effective guidance to parents on fever management? It is difficult to objectively measure the evolution of parents’ knowledge and attitudes regarding symptomatic management of fever given the variability in design and settings among studies and/or ongoing recommendations (1–5). Some practices, such as the use of acetylsalicylic acid and steroids, have been abandoned, and some, such as a cool bath, are now used less often. However, large studies seem to indicate that fever phobia persists and antipyretic drugs are still overused (3–5). Considering that we do seem to have failed in part to provide effective guidance to parents, how did this happen? Do we agree on the key messages? We have achieved widespread international consensus on three key messages (6, 7), which are to rule out severe bacterial infection, focus on the child’s discomfort rather than the fever and avoid the overuse of antipyretics. However, we lack consensus on the definition of discomfort. Parents’ decisions based on the child’s comfort level vary greatly and are influenced by many factors, including cultural and social background. Furthermore, some remaining disputes on basic key issues can be misleading for parents. For example, the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) strongly encourages rectal temperature measurements, whereas the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) strongly discourages it (6, 7). Are the messages clear enough? Although healthcare professionals have become more aware of the need for very simple and clear guidance, a 2005 systematic evaluation of the readability of AAP patient education brochures showed that half were written at higher-than-acceptable readability levels for the general public (8). An important clarification would be to shift from the word antipyretics to analgesics in order to reaffirm our treatment target, which is comfort and not normothermia. Have our messages been sufficiently disseminated using all the media at our disposal? The answer varies greatly from country to country. On the one hand, the mobile apps produced for smartphones and tablets by the UK’s NICE show a strong positive evolution towards adapting educational messages to parents’ technology, even if this approach needs to be extended to more parent-focused information (7). On the other hand, no national papers, videos or e-campaigns have been produced on fever in France, even though there have been some campaigns on more trivial problems, such as the risk of henna tattoos, a questionable hierarchy in public health priorities. Have knowledge and attitudes of healthcare practitioners become more consistent with recommendations than those of parents? The results of the most recent surveys indicate improvements, but also the potential for further optimisation, including basic principles such as the nonsystematic use of drugs (3,4,9). Fever is notoriously difficult to define, even for healthcare practitioners, because children’s normal temperatures and temperaments vary. Many healthcare practitioners share several of the anxieties reported by parents, including fever phobia (10), and demonstrate

[The use of right ventricular support with a centrifugal pump in a case with right ventricular failure due to intraoperative right ventricular infarction].

From Managing Symptoms to Improving Outcomes

Therapeutic Outcomes of Treatment with Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics in Forensic Populations With Schizophrenia-Spectrum Diagnoses

Feasibility and Efficacy of the Cogmed Working Memory Training in Forensic Mental Health Inpatients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: A Pilot Study

Reaching the limits of antipsychotic treatment: the upper end of severe schizophrenia in forensic institutions - a case report

Probing the Biological Underpinnings of Advanced Brain Ageing in Schizophrenia

Immunological and biochemical characterization of membrane proteins.

Ageing patients in forensic psychiatric settings: A review of the literature

Neurolipidomics in schizophrenia: A not so well-oiled machine

Dementia Prevention and Treatment

Fever phobia 35 years later: did we fail?

Aging and Health Among Older people with Serious Mental Illnesses: Research and Clinical Updates

Sentencing and placement of offenders with dementia: a significant contemporary challenge for the criminal justice system

Treating Cognition in Schizophrenia: A Whole Lifespan Perspective

Editorial: Unveiling the neurobiological underpinnings of cognitive dysfunction in patients with schizophrenia

Crossroad between current knowledge and new perspective of diagnostic and therapy of late-onset schizophrenia and very late-onset schizophrenia-like psychosis: An update

Prescribing Trends and Associated Outcomes of Antiepileptic Drugs and Other Psychotropic Medications in US Nursing Homes: Proposal for a Mixed Methods Investigation

Post-discharge pharmacological treatment discontinuation of forensic psychiatric patients in Sweden

P13: From Crisis to Care: Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Psychogeriatric Practice

Antipsychotic Use in Dementia