Abstract:This paper analyses the seismic reputational risks now facing brands as two major sociotechnical forces converge — the rise of ideological polarisation and the emergence of AI’s ability to generate synthetic media impersonating organisations. It examines how brands have embraced polarised stances on social issues to build deeper connections with values-driven consumers, especially younger demographics like millennials and Gen Z. By adopting partisan positions. Brands also become targets for ideological attacks seeking to erode trust. Meanwhile, rapid advances in generative AI empower malicious actors to disseminate disinformation, attacking brands with harmful narratives, misinformation and disinformation on an unprecedented scale and realism to do financial and reputational harm. The paper provides an in-depth examination of both dynamics. It explores how younger consumers increasingly demand corporate advocacy on divisive issues, forcing brands to navigate complex sociopolitical fault lines. Taking progressive stances risks a backlash from ideological opponents ready to instigate reputation-damaging retaliation. The paper also details the exponential threats introduced by AI synthesis technologies like generative adversarial networks. It explains how even modestly resourced attackers could soon produce unlimited volumes of fake content, misinformation and disinformation to target brands across all digital channels and media types. To address these converging risks, the paper recommends that brands invest in capabilities including monitoring sociocultural tensions, technologically authenticating communications, establishing early disinformation warning systems, educating consumers on resisting manipulation, crafting proactive narratives, practicing radical transparency and testing defences. It emphasises the need for holistic ‘narrative intelligence’ combining data analysis, cultural discernment and human wisdom. With deliberate strategies focused on verification, transparency and continuous learning, brands can foster resilience and enduring trust despite inevitable disruptions. The paper concludes that competence in navigating partisan debates and AI deception will become a competitive advantage in determining which brands lead in this complex future.

Between brand attacks and broader narratives: How direct and indirect misinformation erode consumer trust

The role of brands in online safety: Don’t trust Google to sort it out for you

Securing brand trust and reputation in an era of political polarisation and AI-driven disinformation

Characterizing Fake News Targeting Corporations

Disinformation on digital media platforms: A market-shaping approach

Misunderstanding the harms of online misinformation

Misinformation on Misinformation: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges

How People Process Different Types of Health Misinformation: Roles of Content Falsity and Evidence Type

Safeguarding Marketing Research: The Generation, Identification, and Mitigation of AI-Fabricated Disinformation

A broader view of misinformation reveals potential for intervention

Online users' attitudes toward fake news: Implications for brand management

Marketplaces of Misinformation: A Study of How Vaccine Misinformation Is Legitimized on Social Media

Consumer response to fake news about brands on social media: the effects of self-efficacy, media trust, and persuasion knowledge on brand trust

(Why) Is Misinformation a Problem?

Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism

“Don't pretend to be my friend!” When an informal brand communication style backfires on social media

Brands, Truthiness and Post-Fact

Trustworthy Misinformation Mitigation with Soft Information Nudging

Companies inadvertently fund online misinformation despite consumer backlash

Digital marketing and misinformation: Why we need a new professional ethics to guide our practice

What is the disinformation problem? Reviewing the dominant paradigm and motivating an alternative sociopolitical view