Abstract:Measuring the impact of online misinformation is challenging. Traditional measures, such as user views or shares on social media, are incomplete because not everyone who is exposed to misinformation is equally likely to believe it. To address this issue, we developed a method that combines survey data with observational Twitter data to probabilistically estimate the number of users both exposed to and likely to believe a specific news story. As a proof of concept, we applied this method to 139 viral news articles and find that although false news reaches an audience with diverse political views, users who are both exposed and receptive to believing false news tend to have more extreme ideologies. These receptive users are also more likely to encounter misinformation earlier than those who are unlikely to believe it. This mismatch between overall user exposure and receptive user exposure underscores the limitation of relying solely on exposure or interaction data to measure the impact of misinformation, as well as the challenge of implementing effective interventions. To demonstrate how our approach can address this challenge, we then conducted data-driven simulations of common interventions used by social media platforms. We find that these interventions are only modestly effective at reducing exposure among users likely to believe misinformation, and their effectiveness quickly diminishes unless implemented soon after misinformation's initial spread. Our paper provides a more precise estimate of misinformation's impact by focusing on the exposure of users likely to believe it, offering insights for effective mitigation strategies on social media.

A broader view of misinformation reveals potential for intervention

Prominent misinformation interventions reduce misperceptions but increase scepticism

Misinformation poses a bigger threat to democracy than you might think

A survey of expert views on misinformation: Definitions, determinants, solutions, and future of the field

Misunderstanding the harms of online misinformation

Source-credibility information and social norms improve truth discernment and reduce engagement with misinformation online

The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility

Believability and Harmfulness Shape the Virality of Misleading Social Media Posts

Understanding and combatting misinformation across 16 countries on six continents

Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation

Misinformation on Misinformation: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges

Toolbox of individual-level interventions against online misinformation

Measuring receptivity to misinformation at scale on a social media platform

Softly empowering a prosocial expert in the family: lasting effects of a counter-misinformation intervention in an informational autocracy

Disambiguating Disinformation: Extending Beyond the Veracity of Online Content

Debunking Three Myths About Misinformation

Misinformation exploits outrage to spread online

Misinformation as a harm: structured approaches for fact-checking prioritization

Encounters with Visual Misinformation and Labels Across Platforms: An Interview and Diary Study to Inform Ecosystem Approaches to Misinformation Interventions

"I don't trust them": Exploring Perceptions of Fact-checking Entities for Flagging Online Misinformation

Social Media COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions Viewed Positively, But Have Limited Impact