Abstract:BackgroundThe management and prognosis of aortic dissection (AD) is often challenging and the use of personalised computational models is being explored as a tool to improve clinical outcome. Including vessel wall motion in such simulations can provide more realistic and potentially accurate results, but requires significant additional computational resources, as well as expertise. With clinical translation as the final aim, trade-offs between complexity, speed and accuracy are inevitable. The present study explores whether modelling wall motion is worth the additional expense in the case of AD, by carrying out fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations based on a sample patient case.MethodsPatient-specific anatomical details were extracted from computed tomography images to provide the fluid domain, from which the vessel wall was extrapolated. Two-way fluid-structure interaction simulations were performed, with coupled Windkessel boundary conditions and hyperelastic wall properties. The blood was modelled using the Carreau-Yasuda viscosity model and turbulence was accounted for via a shear stress transport model. A simulation without wall motion (rigid wall) was carried out for comparison purposes.ResultsThe displacement of the vessel wall was comparable to reports from imaging studies in terms of intimal flap motion and contraction of the true lumen. Analysis of the haemodynamics around the proximal and distal false lumen in the FSI model showed complex flow structures caused by the expansion and contraction of the vessel wall. These flow patterns led to significantly different predictions of wall shear stress, particularly its oscillatory component, which were not captured by the rigid wall model.ConclusionsThrough comparison with imaging data, the results of the present study indicate that the fluid-structure interaction methodology employed herein is appropriate for simulations of aortic dissection. Regions of high wall shear stress were not significantly altered by the wall motion, however, certain collocated regions of low and oscillatory wall shear stress which may be critical for disease progression were only identified in the FSI simulation. We conclude that, if patient-tailored simulations of aortic dissection are to be used as an interventional planning tool, then the additional complexity, expertise and computational expense required to model wall motion is indeed justified.

[Application of computational fluid dynamics based on fluid-structure interaction in aortic dissection]

Numerical simulation of two-phase non-Newtonian blood flow with fluid-structure interaction in aortic dissection

Application and research progress of multidetector computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis of aortic dissection

Aortic Dissection Blood Two-Phase Flow Numerical Simulation Study

Abstract 589: A Fluid Structure Interaction Workflow For Studying Aortic Dissections

[Review of Numerical Simulation Study of Stanford Type B Thoracic Aortic Dissection].

Role of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Thoracic Aortic Diseases Research: Technical Superiority and Application Prospect

Numerical simulation of hemodynamics in aortic dissection

The Potential of Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulation on Serial Monitoring of Hemodynamic Change in Type B Aortic Dissection

Systematic Review of the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics for Adult Aortic Diseases

Aortic dissection simulation models for clinical support: fluid-structure interaction vs. rigid wall models

A proposal of risk indicators for pathological development from hemodynamic simulation: application to aortic dissection

Computational modeling of the fluid flow in type B aortic dissection using a modified finite element embedded formulation

Biomechanical Factors Influencing Type B Thoracic Aortic Dissection: Computational Fluid Dynamics Study

The Interactions Between Bloodstream and Vascular Structure on Aortic Dissecting Aneurysmal Model: A Numerical Study

An integrated fluid–structure interaction and thrombosis model for type B aortic dissection

4D Flow MRI-Based Computational Analysis of Blood Flow in Patient-Specific Aortic Dissection.

Quantitative Hemodynamics in Aortic Dissection: Comparing in Vitro MRI with FSI Simulation in a Compliant Model

Investigation of pulsatile flowfield in healthy thoracic aorta models

Comparative Analysis of Patient-Specific Aortic Dissections through Computational Fluid Dynamics Suggests Increased Likelihood of Degeneration in Partially Thrombosed False Lumen

Fluid–structure interaction simulation of visceral perfusion and impact of different cannulation methods on aortic dissection