Long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab for severe bullous pemphigoid: A prospective cohort study

Dawei Huang,Yuexin Zhang,Yingyuan Yu,Yuxiong Jiang,Luyang Kong,Yangfeng Ding,Yuling Shi,Yunlu Gao
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2023.111157
Abstract:Background: Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common subepidermal bullous disease. Dupilumab is a novel treatment for BP. However, its long-term efficacy and safety have not been demonstrated in prospective studies. Objective: Evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of dupilumab in treating severe BP. Methods: Patients were divided into two groups: the methylprednisolone monotherapy group (M), and the methylprednisolone and dupilumab combination therapy group (D + M). This study consisted of two stages. The first stage focused on the initial treatment phase, where the early efficacy and safety was evaluated. The study then entered the 12-month maintenance treatment stage, where we assessed recurrence in both groups. Additionally, we evaluated the rate of healing of skin lesions, glucocorticoids burden and length of hospital stay and various laboratory test indicators. Results: After four weeks of treatment, the Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) and pruritus Numerical Rating Scale scores of the D + M group decreased significantly more than those of the M group. The median BPDAI at week 4 was 0 (range: 0.0-3.0) in the D + M group and 10.0 (5.0-12.0) in the M group (P < 0.001). Patients treated with dupilumab experienced a faster cessation of new blisters, quicker glucocorticoid reduction, shorter healing times, and shorter hospital stays (P < 0.001). Additionally, after two weeks of treatment, the levels of eosinophils and immunoglobulin E also decreased (P < 0.001). Follow-up studies further demonstrated that dupilumab monotherapy was associated with a lower recurrence rate. Notably, no serious adverse effects were observed in the study. Conclusions: Our study provides evidence for the efficacy of dupilumab in the treatment of BP based on prospective studies. Additionally, our findings suggest that dupilumab can be considered a reliable single-agent maintenance treatment due to its good safety profile and lower relapse.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?