Abstract:Predicting pesticide risk based on landscape patterns could enable landscape‐scale ERA. However, simple metrics of landscape pattern, such as proportion of agricultural land, are not sufficient. We found that risk observed in bee‐collected pollen was best predicted when integrating spatialized pesticide use in the pesticide exposure model, underscoring the importance of such data for research, monitoring and mitigation. Further, we propose a guidance framework for future landscape ecotoxicological risk analyses that clarifies data needs relative to risk prediction goals. Pesticide use in agricultural landscapes creates environmental contamination that is heterogenous in space and time. Mobile organisms, such as bees, are exposed to multiple contamination sources when visiting patches that vary in the amount, timing and toxicity of pesticides used. Yet, environmental risk assessments (ERA) typically fail to consider this heterogeneity, in part because of the complexities of estimating exposure to different pesticides, and subsequent risk at organism‐relevant scales. We use pesticide assays of 269 bee‐collected pollen samples to understand the spatiotemporal variability of risk across a network of 41 field sites in southern Sweden. Observed bee pesticide risk is calculated based on compound‐specific residue quantifications in pollen and standardized toxicity data. We then compare the ability of three classes of landscape‐scale variables to predict this risk: (1) landscape composition and configuration metrics, (2) landscape load based on national pesticide use data and (3) predictions from a newly developed bee pesticide exposure model. Based on use data, 10 crops account for 81% of the total risk. We detected 49 pesticide compounds in bee‐collected pollen. Although herbicides and fungicides constitute the bulk of detected pesticides, both in frequency and amount quantified, unsurprisingly, insecticides contribute the most to risk. Landscape composition and configuration metrics did not predict observed pesticide risk, and interactions with bee species indicate taxa‐dependency in predictions. Landscape load predicted observed risk consistently between taxa. Risk estimates from our exposure model were strongly predictive but only when considering realized risk (i.e., risk estimates based on prior pesticide use information). Synthesis and applications. Predicting pesticide risk based on landscape patterns could enable landscape‐scale ERA. However, simple metrics of landscape pattern, such as proportion of agricultural land, are not sufficient. We found that risk observed in bee‐collected pollen was best predicted when integrating spatialized pesticide use in the pesticide exposure model, underscoring the importance of such data for research, monitoring and mitigation. Further, we propose a guidance framework for future landscape ecotoxicological risk analyses that clarifies data needs relative to risk prediction goals.

A spatially explicit model of landscape pesticide exposure to bees: Development, exploration, and evaluation

Landscapes of risk: A comparative analysis of landscape metrics for the ecotoxicological assessment of pesticide risk to bees

SolBeePopecotox: A Population Model for Pesticide Risk Assessments of Solitary Bees

Dynamic energy budget model for a bumble bee colony: Predicting the spatial distribution and dynamics of colonies across multiple seasons

Inferring pesticide toxicity to honey bees from a field-based feeding study using a colony model and Bayesian inference

A spatially extended model to assess the role of landscape structure on the pollination service of Apis mellifera

The impact of landscape structure on pesticide exposure to honey bees

Comprehensive Survey of Area-Wide Agricultural Pesticide Use in Southern United States Row Crops and Potential Impact on Honey Bee Colonies

Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Exposure to Pesticide Residues in Nectar and Pollen in Urban and Suburban Environments from Four Regions of the United States

Pesticide Usage Practices and the Exposure Risk to Pollinators: A Case Study in the North China Plain.

Identities, concentrations, and sources of pesticide exposure in pollen collected by managed bees during blueberry pollination

Integrating QSAR models predicting acute contact toxicity and mode of action profiling in honey bees (A. mellifera): Data curation using open source databases, performance testing and validation

Pesticide exposure patterns in honey bees during migratory pollination

Pesticide Residues and Bees – A Risk Assessment

Ecological-economic modelling of interactions between wild and commercial bees and pesticide use

Spatio-Temporal Dynamics of Landscape Use by the Bumblebee Bombus atratus (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and its relationship with pollen provisioning

Landscape-modified Concentration Effect and Waylaying Effect of Bees and Their Consequences on Pollination of Mass-Flowering Plants in Agricultural Ecosystems

Spatio-temporal dynamics of landscape use by the bumblebee Bombus pauloensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae) and its relationship with pollen provisioning

In Silico Prediction of Chemical Acute Contact Toxicity on Honey Bees Via Machine Learning Methods.

Distance models reveal biases associated with passive trapping methods for measuring wild bee abundance

Leveraging In Silico Structure-Activity Models to Predict Acute Honey Bee (Apis mellifera) Toxicity for Agrochemicals