Basic quality indicators for clinical care of patients with major depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder

Eduard Vieta,José Manuel Menchón Magriña,Miguel Bernardo Arroyo,Víctor Pérez Sola,Carmen Moreno Ruiz,Celso Arango López,Julio Bobes García,Manuel Martín Carrasco,Diego Palao Vidal,Ana González-Pinto Arrillaga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpsm.2023.03.001
Abstract:Objective: To identify a set of indicators to monitor the quality of care for patients with major depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. Methods: A group of 10 experts selected the most automatically applicable indicators from a total of 98 identified in a previous study. Five online sessions and 5 discussion meetings were performed to select the indicators that met theoretical feasibility criteria automatically. Subsequently, feasibility was tested in a pilot study conducted in two hospitals of the Spanish Health Service. Results: After evaluating its measurement possibilities in the Spanish Health Service, and the fulfillment of all the quality premises defined, 16 indicators were selected. Three were indicators of major depression, 5 of schizophrenia, 3 of bipolar disorder, and 5 indicators common to all three pathologies. They included measures related to patient safety, maintenance and follow-up of treatment, therapeutic adherence, and adequacy of hospital admissions. After the pilot study, 5 indicators demonstrated potential in the automatic generation of results, with 3 of them related to treatments (clozapine in schizophrenia, lithium for bipolar disorder, and valproate in women of childbearing age). Conclusions: Indicators support the monitoring of the quality of treatment of patients with major depression, schizophrenia, or bipolar disorder. Based on this proposal, each care setting can draw up a balanced scorecard adjusted to its priorities and care objectives, which will allow for comparison between centers.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?