Midpregnancy Placental Growth Factor Screening and Early Preterm Birth
Rachel A. Gladstone,Sumaiya Ahmed,Ella Huszti,Kelsey McLaughlin,John W. Snelgrove,Jennifer Taher,Sebastian R. Hobson,Rory C. Windrim,Kellie E. Murphy,John C. Kingdom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.44454
2024-11-22
JAMA Network Open
Abstract:Importance Early preterm birth (ie, at less than 34 weeks' gestation) confers a high risk for adverse health outcomes, yet no universal screening strategy exists, preventing targeted delivery of effective interventions. Objective To evaluate the ability of midpregnancy placental growth factor (PlGF) screening to identify pregnancies at highest risk for early preterm birth. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study was conducted at an urban, tertiary care center from 2020 to 2023. Participants were unselected, pregnant people with singleton pregnancies, receiving universal-access prenatal care from obstetricians, family physicians, or midwives, who underwent a PlGF test at the time of routine gestational diabetes screening, typically at 24 to 28 weeks' gestation. Data were analyzed from January to May 2024. Exposure PlGF level less than 100 pg/mL at the time of gestational diabetes screen. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was all early preterm birth, defined as less than 34 weeks' gestation. Secondary outcomes included iatrogenic preterm birth, spontaneous preterm birth, preeclampsia, stillbirth, and small-for-gestational-age birth weight. Results Among 9037 unique pregnant individuals, 156 (1.7%) experienced early preterm birth (52 spontaneous births; 104 iatrogenic births). The area under the curve (AUC) for PlGF and early preterm birth was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.85). Low PlGF level was associated with early preterm birth (positive likelihood ratio [LR], 79.400 [95% CI, 53.434-115.137]; negative LR, 0.606 [95% CI, 0.494-0.742]; specificity, 99.5% [95% CI, 99.3%-99.6%]; negative predictive value, 98.9% [95% CI, 98.8%-99.1%]). Time to birth from PlGF test was significantly reduced among patients with a PlGF level less than 100 pg/mL, among whom more than 50% delivered within 50 days of testing. Individuals with a low PlGF level made up more than 30% of subsequent stillbirths (aRR, 36.78 [95% CI, 18.63-72.60]) and more than half of patients requiring iatrogenic early preterm birth (aRR, 92.11 [95% CI, 64.83-130.87]). The AUC for iatrogenic early preterm birth was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94). Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that low PlGF level (<100 pg/mL), identified at the time of routine gestational diabetes screening, may be a powerful clinical tool to identify pregnant people at risk of early preterm birth, especially in iatrogenic births. Strategic redirection of tertiary health care resources to this high-risk group could improve maternal and perinatal outcomes.
medicine, general & internal