Choquet Integration on Set Systems

U. Faigle,M. Grabisch,M. Heyne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14049-5_53

2010-06-28

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

High body mass index is a strong predictor of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in spinal surgery patients when prophylactic film dressings are applied: A retrospective analysis prior to the BOSS Trial

Mine Yoshimura,Norihiko Ohura,Nick Santamaria,Yorikatsu Watanabe,Tanetaka Akizuki,Amit Gefen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13287

2020-02-17

International Wound Journal

Abstract:<p>We reported the efficacy of soft silicone multilayered foam dressings in preventing intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries (IAPIs) in the prone position using a Relton‐Hall frame (BOSS trial). The aim of this study was to clarify the incidence and extract the risk factors for IAPIs in cases in which polyurethane film dressing was used against IAPIs before the BOSS trial period. This study conducted as a retrospective dual‐center cohort study between August 2014 and Jun 2015 using the medical records in the operating room. The incidence of IAPIs that developed within 24 hours after surgery was 7.1% (7/99). The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index (BMI) (P = .0016, odds ratio [OR]: 1.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08‐1.4) and length of surgery (P < .0001, OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.86‐3.51) were independently associated with the development of IAPIs. Since high BMI was not extracted in BOSS trial, we conclude that the application of soft silicone multilayer foam dressings is important for preventing the development of IAPIs in patients with high BMI values.</p>

dermatology,surgery
The Prevalence, Incidence, And Associated Factors Of Pressure Injuries Among Immobile Inpatients: A Multicentre, Cross-Sectional, Exploratory Descriptive Study In China

Ying Liu,Xinjuan Wu,Yufen Ma,Zhen Li,Jing Cao,Jing Jiao,Ge Liu,Fangfang Li,Baoyun Song,Jingfen Jin,Yilan Liu,Xianxiu Wen,Shouzhen Cheng,Frances Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13054

2019-01-01

International Wound Journal

Abstract:The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, incidence, and the associated factors of pressure injuries (PIs) among immobile hospitalised patients in China. Being immobile during hospitalisation put these patients at a higher risk of PIs. There is little literature about pressure injury (PI) prevalence or PI incidence in immobile hospitalised patients in hospitals in China. This was a multicentre, cross-sectional, exploratory descriptive study. A total of 23 985 immobile patients were recruited from 25 general hospitals in six provinces of China from November 1, 2015 to March 18, 2016. Information was collected on demographic characteristics, physical assessment information, and treatment and nursing care measures. The PI period prevalence was 3.38%, and the PI cumulative incidence was 1.23%. Most PIs (84.03%) were Stage 1 or Stage 2. A total of 48.22% of PIs occurred in the sacrum or heel region. In the multivariate analysis, the following factors were associated with higher PI prevalence: age, gender, length of immobility, type of hospital, modified Braden Scale score, urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence, low serum albumin, the usage of fixation or restraint devices, and patient's discharge diagnosis (lower limb fracture, malnutrition, and spinal cord injury). PI prevalence for immobile hospitalised patients in the study was lower than those reported in literature. However, because of the large population in China, the number of patients who suffer with PIs can be very high. The relating factors of higher PI prevalence identified in this study were consistent with current literature. Patients with a higher number of these associated factors should be monitored more closely, and preventative measures should be taken to prevent PI occurrence in high-risk populations.
Mutagenic activity of the 4,5‐ and 9,10‐dihydrodiols of benzo[J]fluoranthene and their syn‐ and anti‐dihydrodiol epoxides in salmonella typhimurium

Milton V. Marshall,Zhenjie He,E. Weyand,J. E. Rice,E. LaVoie

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/em.2850220107

Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis

Abstract:The objective of this study was to determine the relative mutagenic activities of the major dihydrodiol metabolites of benzo[j]fluoranthene (B[j]F) and their corresponding syn‐ and anti‐dihydrodiol epoxides. Salmonella typhimurium tester strains TA97a, TA98, and TA100 were used to evaluate the mutagenic potencies of the parent hydrocarbon and these suspect proximate and ultimate mutagenic metabolites. B[j]F and the trans‐dihydrodiol metabolites were active only in the presence of an external metabolic activation system (S9) with the exception of the B[j]F‐4,5‐diol, which was weakly active in TA98 and TA100 in the absence of S9. The B[j]F‐4,5‐diol was more mutagenic than the B[j]F‐9,10‐diol in tester strains TA98 and TA100, whereas the opposite effect was observed in TA97a. In the absence of S9, the anti‐B[j]F‐4,5‐diol epoxide was more mutagenic than the syn‐B[j]F‐4,5‐diol epoxide and the syn‐ and anti‐B[j]F‐9,10‐diol epoxides in tester strains TA97a and TA100. The exceptional mutagenic potency of the anti‐B[j]F‐4,5‐diol epoxide in TA100 resembles that observed by epoxides located within a fjord, or by the anti‐diol epoxides of bay region methylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. In contrast, the mutagenicity of the pseudo bay region dihydrodiol epoxides arising from the B[j]F‐9,10‐diol more closely resembles that observed with the classical bay region dihydrodiol epoxides of chrysene. In summary, both dihydrodiol metabolites of B[j]F are mutagenic in S. typhimurium, and the relative potency varies among the tester strains. The highest mutagenic response was achieved in tester strain TA100, which detects base‐pair substitutions. The most potent direct‐acting dihydrodiol epoxide in this tester strain was the anti‐B[j]F‐4,5‐diol epoxide, which agrees with the results of mouse skin painting studies that indicate that the B[j]F‐4,5‐diol is more tumorigenic that the parent hydrocarbon or the B[j]F‐9,10‐diol. A cova‐lent DNA adduct formed between the anti‐B[j]F‐4,5‐diol epoxide and deoxyguanosine was the major species of DNA adduct formed in S. typhimurium. This adduct corresponds to the major DNA adduct formed in mouse skin following application B[j]F.
Agreement criteria between expected and measured field fluences in IMRT of head and neck cancer: the importance and use of the gamma histograms statistical analysis.

Elena De Martin,C. Fiorino,S. Broggi,B. Longobardi,A. Pierelli,L. Perna,G. Cattaneo,R. Calandrino

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RADONC.2007.10.004

IF: 6.901

2007-12-01

Radiotherapy and Oncology

Abstract:
Preventing pressure injury in open-heart surgical patients: A systematic review

Hamed Taghiloo,Abbas Ebadi,Yaser Saeid,Alireza Jalali Farahni,Atefeh Davoudian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1148

2023-03-17

Abstract:Background: Cardiac surgical patients are highly prone to developing surgery-related Pressure injuries (PIs). Prevention of PIs is an important patient safety priority in healthcare settings and patients care. So the aim of this study is to detect the effectiveness of prevention strategies to decrease PIs prevalence and incidence in patients undergoing open heart surgery. Method: We identified studies through Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Cochrane, and ProQuest databases from inception through September 2022 with restrictions on the English language. Cochrane RoB 2, JBI, and NIH checklist were carried out as critical appraisal Tools to investigate the studies risk of bias. Finally, 10 studies with a total sample No. 1348, which fulfilled eligibility criteria were included in final systematic review. Result: Most common interventions investigated in included studies were addressing impairments skin care which included the use of multilayer silicone foam, Care bundle and multiple intervention programs, alternative head inflatable pads, pressure-reducing foam mattresses, and electric bed frames as the effective PIs Prevention (PIP) strategies. While repositioning is one of the important causes mentioned in most PIP protocols, there was not adequate evidence to recommend any special turning regimens for PIP. Conclusion: Given current evidence, multilayer silicone foam, Care bundle and multiple intervention programs, alternative inflatable head pads, pressure-reducing foam mattresses, and electric bed frames are effective strategies to prevent pressure ulcers. Further investigations are needed to specify the cost-effectiveness of mentioned strategies and RCTs to determine other PIP strategies such as repositioning and mobilization, nutritional supplementation, creams, and co-interventions effects.
Explore the effect of pressure and time of compression on the risk of intraoperatively acquired pressure injury based on theoretical framework: A prospective study

Yuan Chen,Wei Wang,QianJian Qian,Qinghua Zha,BeiWen Wu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14809

Abstract:Surgery is a high risk factor for the occurrence of pressure injury (PI). On the basis of theoretical research, pressure and duration of pressure are key factors affecting PI. Pressure is affected by the individual pressure redistribution capacity. So our study aims to explore how the surgery time and pressure intensity affect the occurrence of PI and what are the risk factors. A prospective study. A total of 250 patients who underwent elective surgery in a grade-A general hospital from November 2021 to February 2023 were selected and divided into a group of 77 patients with IAPI (intraoperatively acquired pressure injury) and a group of 173 patients with no IAPI. Visual pressure inductive feedback system and body composition analysis technology were used to record the local pressure value and change of patients before and after anaesthesia. Relevant data of the patients were collected to explore the influencing factors. The maximum pressure and average pressure at the pressure site of the same patient changed before and after anaesthesia, and the pressure after anaesthesia was significantly higher than that before anaesthesia. There was no statistical difference in the average pressure after anaesthesia (p > 0.05), but the maximum pressure in the IAPI group was higher than that in the non-occurrence group (p < 0.05). The average pressure multiplied by the operation time in IAPI group is significantly higher than that in the non-IAPI group (p < 0.01). Multiple linear regression analysis (stepwise regression) showed that fat-free weight, age, waist circumference, body mass index (BMI) and gender were taken as independent variables into the regression model, affecting the maximum pressure. In addition, operation time ≥4 h may be a high risk factor for IAPI. In future studies, more objective research tools can be applied to improve the accuracy of predicting the risk of IAPI. In addition to gender and BMI, follow-up studies may consider including measures such as waist circumference and fat-free body weight in IAPI risk assessment to guide the clinical nursing work more scientifically.
Prevention of Pressure Injuries in the Operating Room: A Quality Improvement Project

Riemenschneider, Karen J.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000410

2019-10-03

Abstract:Prevention of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) remains a crucial clinical challenge especially for those patients undergoing surgery. The purpose of this project was to examine whether a 5-layer silicone foam dressing applied to the sacrum of patients undergoing vascular surgery decreased the occurrence of sacral pressure injuries and to explore participant characteristics associated with the development of operating room (OR)-related pressure injuries. A pre-/postintervention design, quality improvement project in a convenience sample of 81 patients undergoing vascular surgery, in a 700-bed level I trauma acute care setting, in the Northeastern United States. Eighty-one patients undergoing vascular surgery participated in this project. Thirty-seven were in the preintervention group who were identified from the housewide pressure injury prevalence data from May and December 2010 and received standard pressure injury prevention while hospitalized. Forty-four patients in the intervention group were identified from a hospital-based outpatient vascular surgery office and preoperatively received the 5-layer silicone foam dressing in addition to standard care. Data were collected on the third and seventh postoperative days via the electronic medical record and paper medical records. Collected data included age, gender, comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, peripheral vascular disease and, smoking status), presence of a 5-layer silicone sacral foam dressing, and pressure injury occurrence. Analysis included descriptive statistics, Fisher exact test to compare groups, and logistic regression to identify associated risk factors. More than 50% (n = 19) in the preintervention group developed a hospital-acquired pressure injury while only 1 subject (n = 2%) in the intervention group developed a hospital-acquired pressure injury (P = .000). Findings indicate that, after controlling for age, gender, and other comorbidities, application of a 5-layer silicone sacral foam dressing significantly reduced the likelihood of development of a new pressure injury (OR= 0.04, 95% confidence interval, 0.00-40; P = .006). This pre–/postquality improvement project, using a 5-layer silicone sacral foam dressing in addition to standard operating room pressure injury preventive interventions, for elective vascular surgical cases, resulted in a significant decrease in sacral operating room-related pressure injuries. These findings suggest the effectiveness of a 5-layer silicone foam dressing when added to standard preventive interventions. The findings warrant further investigation of additional preventative interventions in the OR specific to high-risk populations.
Incidence and Risk Factors of Pressure Injuries in Surgical Spinal Patients

Yupei Zeng,Suzhen Huang,Jia-li Wu,X. Long,M. Luo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000570

2019-09-01

Abstract:PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the incidence and identify risk factors of pressure injury development during the perioperative period in patients undergoing spinal surgery requiring intraoperative positioning in the prone position. DESIGN: Review of medical records. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: The sample comprised 3834 patients; 52.2% (n = 2006) were male and 65.5% (n = 2516) were older than 60 years. Most patients underwent surgery of the lumbosacral spinal segments (43.4%, n = 1667) followed by cervical (32.3%, n = 1241) and thoracic spinal segments (24.2%, n = 932). The study setting was the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Jiang XI Province in southeastern China. METHODS: We reviewed charts of patients who underwent spinal surgery requiring intraoperative positioning in the prone position from November 2013 to July 2016. Demographic data, Braden Scale for Pressure Sore Risk cumulative score (measured before preoperative transport), body mass index (BMI), duration of surgery, preoperative time (time between preoperative transport from the inpatient unit to when the operation began), postoperative time (time between when the operation was over and postoperative transport to the inpatient unit), and development of any pressure injury were collected using a standardized form. Factors associated with an increased or decreased likelihood of pressure injury were initially evaluated with χ2 and independent t tests. Logistic regression was then used to identify potential risk factors for perioperative pressure injury in patients undergoing open spinal surgery requiring placement in the supine position during surgery. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four of 3840 patients (4.7%) developed pressure injuries. Multivariate analysis indicated that factors associated with intraoperative pressure injury development were older than 60 years (odds ratio [OR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.02-2.17), BMI under 18 kg/m2 (OR = 2.45, 95% CI = 4.05-5.21), cumulative Braden Scale score 13 or less (OR = 6.59, CI = 2.23-3.98), prolonged preoperative time (OR = 5.99, 95% CI = 3.21-6.12), and prolonged postoperative time (OR = 14.23, 95% CI = 10.23-21.19). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these findings we recommend extending preventive interventions for pressure injury to incorporate the time from preoperative transport to the surgical suite to inpatient care unit following surgery.

Medicine
Decreasing Intraoperative Skin Damage in Prone-Position Surgeries

Barbara M Bates-Jensen,Jessica Crocker,Vicky Nguyen,Lauren Robertson,Deborah Nourmand,Emily Chirila,Mohamed Laayouni,Ofelia Offendel,Kelly Peng,Stephanie Anne Romero,Gerry Fulgentes,Heather E McCreath

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000186

2024-08-01

Abstract:Objective: To determine if subepidermal moisture (SEM) measures help detect and prevent intraoperative acquired pressure injuries (IAPIs) for prone-position surgery. Methods: In this clinical trial of patients (n = 39 preintervention, n = 48 intervention, 100 historical control) undergoing prone-position surgery, researchers examined the use of multidimensionally flexible silicone foam (MFSF) dressings applied preoperatively to patients' face, chest, and iliac crests. Visual skin assessments and SEM measures were obtained preoperatively, postoperatively, and daily for up to 5 days or until discharge. Electronic health record review included demographic, medical, and surgery data. Results: Of the 187 total participants, 76 (41%) were women. Participants' mean age was 61.0 ± 15.0 years, and 9.6% were Hispanic (n = 18), 9.6% were Asian (n = 18), 6.9% were Black or African American (n = 13), and 73.8% were White (n = 138). Participants had a mean Scott-Triggers IAPI risk score of 1.5 ± 1.1. Among those with no erythema preoperatively, fewer intervention participants exhibited postoperative erythema on their face and chest than did preintervention participants. Further, fewer intervention participants had SEM-defined IAPIs at all locations in comparison with preintervention participants. The MFSF dressings overcame IAPI risk factors of surgery length, skin tone, and body mass index with fewer IAPIs in intervention participants. Conclusions: Patients undergoing prone-position surgeries developed fewer IAPIs, and SEM measures indicated no damage when MFSF dressings were applied to sites preoperatively. The SEM measures detected more damage than visual assessment.
An exploratory study of risk factors for pressure injury in patients undergoing spine surgery

DaeHee Suh,Su Yeon Kim,Byunghoon Yoo,Sangseok Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.20081

2021-01-31

Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

Abstract:Background: Perioperative patients are potentially at risk for pressure injuries due to anesthetic agents and surgical positioning. Pressure injury increases discomfort and pain in patients and causes complications, which lead to an increase in mortality and hospitalization duration. Most previous studies did not focus on specific types of surgery or surgical positioning. We tried to identify the incidence of perioperative pressure injury during spinal surgery and perioperative risk factors that contribute to pressure injury.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed electronic medical records of 663 patients who underwent spinal surgery between March 2016 and May 2018. The primary outcome was occurrence of pressure injury. Potential risk factors of pressure injury were selected based on previous studies and expert opinion, and divided into two sub-categories: preoperative and intraoperative risk factors. We compared the clinical characteristics of patients in the pressure injury and non-injury groups. Perioperative risk factors for pressure injury were analyzed by logistic regression.Results: Among 663 patients, the incidence of all stages of pressure injury was 5.9%. The face and inguinal regions were the most injured sites (both 28.6%). The pressure injury group showed a 13% longer hospitalization period. Preoperative plasma concentration of protein was associated with 0.5-fold lower pressure injury (OR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.27 to 0.95; P = 0.034).Conclusions: The incidence of pressure injury was similar to that previously reported and occurred in the direct weight-bearing areas, which led to longer hospitalization. We found that a lower preoperative serum protein level is significantly associated with intraoperative pressure injury occurrence during spinal surgery.
Incidence of and risk factors for self-load-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study

Tomoko Shimura,Gojiro Nakagami,Rei Ogawa,Shimpei Ono,Toshiaki Takahashi,Misako Nagata,Kosuke Kashiwabara,Junko Sugama,Hiromi Sanada,Makoto Oe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.13022

Abstract:There are two types of pressure injuries: self-load-related pressure injuries (PIs) and medical device-related pressure injuries (MDRPIs), but the differences in risk factors between PIs and MDRPIs have not yet been clarified. If risk factors for PIs and MDRPIs differ, preventive interventions should take this into account. This is a prospective cohort study aimed to determine the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs in critically ill patients and to identify corresponding risk factors. The study included 1418 patients who were admitted to the critical care medical center of a single university hospital in Tokyo, Japan, between 1 December 2019 and 31 August 2020. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs. Furthermore, the Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyse the predictors in both the PI and MDRPI incidence and non-incidence groups. Predictors were based on data from the 0th disease day. The cumulative incidence of PIs and MDRPIs was 4.6/1000 person-days and 3.6/1000 person-days, respectively. Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model showed that common risk factors for the occurrence of PIs and MDRPIs were possession of PI on admission, higher blood lactate, blood purification therapy, and positional restriction. The risk factors for PIs only were diabetes mellitus, septic shock, and a lower serum albumin level, while the risk factors for MDRPIs only were the D-dimer level and extracorporeal membranous oxygenation treatment. Therefore, prophylactic interventions need to consider these different risk factors.
The effect of support surface on the prevention of pressure injury in acute care settings: a multi-center prospective observational study

Mi-Ock Shim,Chul-Gyu Kim,Ja Kyung Min,So Yeon Kwak,Hyunhee Ghil,Seungmi Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtv.2024.06.009

IF: 3.374

2024-06-23

Journal of Tissue Viability

Abstract:Highlights • Applying a multi-form mattress to patients admitted to the intensive care unit had a statistically significant effect in preventing pressure injuries. • The adoption of a prospective research design to compare the incidence rates of pressure injuries between multi-form mattresses and altenating air mattress overlay across multiple acute hospitals has significance. • When preventing pressure injuries in intensive care unit patients, variables such as incontinence management and nutritional adjustments should be carefully considered. Purpose This study aimed to analyze if a multi-foam core mattress with a laminated cover can reduce the incidence of pressure injuries, compared to an alternating air mattress overlay among critically ill patients in acute settings. Design Prospective observational study. Participants and setting: Patients with a Braden scale score ≤16 on intensive care unit admission at five general hospitals in Korea were included in this study between February 2022 and March 2022. Methods One hundred and twenty patients in acute settings were enrolled and categorized into two groups: a multi-form core mattress with a laminated cover group (n = 60) and an alternating air mattress overlay group (n = 60). Data were collected for 7 days by wound care nurses. Results Pressure injury developed at a significantly lower rate in the multi-form core mattress with a laminated cover group (n = 4/60, 6.7%) than in the alternating air mattress overlay group (n = 25/60, 25.0%) ( P = 0.011). Using a multi-foam core mattress with a laminated cover demonstrated a protective effect against pressure injuries (odds ratio 0.123, 95% confidence interval 0.024–0.620, P = 0.011). Conclusions A multi-foam core mattress with a laminated cover was significantly more effective than an alternating air mattress overlay in preventing pressure injury in critically ill patients.

dermatology,nursing
Pressure Injury Prevention in Cardiac Surgery Using Risk Factor Assessment and Standardization

Tim Madeira

Abstract:Cardiac surgical patients are more susceptible to pressure injury (PI) than other surgical specialties, and little is known about PI prevention (PIP) in this population. How do PIP strategies, compared to standard care, affect the incidence of PI during the post-operative recovery among adult cardiac surgery patients? The aim was to reduce the incidence of UAPI in an adult CVSICU by 5% in six weeks. The conceptual framework chosen was The Iowa Model Revised, and the theoretical framework employed was the Theoretical Model for Lesion Development. Quality improvement, single-group pretest-posttest design. Sample consisted of 69 cardiac surgery, LVAD, ECMO patients at Johns Hopkins CVSICU. The intervention was a standardized PIP bundle provided to “highest risk” patients screened before surgery. Outcome measures were UAPI count and incidence rates. Process measures were percentage of patients screened, prophylactic sacral dressing, rental bed cost. Balancing measures were PI severity, anatomic location, and time between wounds. Baseline data consisted of historic data and intervention data consisted of weekly survey observations. Implementation consisted of staff education, daily preoperative screening, weekly wound rounds. 33% of patients screened as “highest risk” and received the PIP bundle. PI count decreased from 25 to 13 during implementation and wound stages improved. Chi Square test of 2-proportions showed a reduced PI incidence of 8.56% (Z=1.66, p= .048) and 2-sample Poisson rate showed significance in count (Z=1.95, p=.036). Location changed to nose, buttocks, and occipital locations. There was an overall cost savings of $78,660. Reducing PI lead to reduced morbidity and cost.

Medicine
Factors Associated With Perioperative Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Observational Study

C. Kim,Yoon Jung Kim,H. Oh,Seung Heon Yang,W. Yuh,Seungeun Choi,Hee-Pyoung Park,Chun Kee Chung,Chang-Hyun Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000000867

2022-08-25

Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology

Abstract:Background: Hospital acquired pressure injury (HAPI) is associated with poor clinical outcomes and high medical costs. Patients undergoing surgery in the prone position are particularly vulnerable to perioperative HAPI. This prospective observational study investigated the factors associated with HAPI in patients undergoing elective spine surgery in the prone position. Methods: Two hundred eighty-seven patients undergoing elective spine surgery participated in this study. Demographics, perioperative vital signs, laboratory findings, surgical data, and intraoperative data were prospectively recorded. The sites and stages of HAPI were investigated on postoperative day 2. The stages of HAPI were evaluated using the pressure injury staging system of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Results: Perioperative HAPI was observed in 71 (24.7%) patients (stage 1, 40; stage 2, 31). The most frequent site (number) of HAPI was the upper extremities (33), followed by the chest (32), lower extremities (20), face (18), pelvis (10), and abdomen (9). In multivariate analysis, the duration of prone positioning per hour (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], 1.48 [1.25-1.74]; P<0.001) and intraoperative pH ≤7.35 (1.98 [1.05-3.76]; P=0.036) were associated with perioperative HAPI. Conclusions: The incidence of perioperative HAPI was 24.7% in patients undergoing elective spine surgery in the prone position. Long duration of prone positioning and intraoperative acidosis were associated with increased development of perioperative HAPI.

Medicine
Pressure injuries in the operating room: who are at risk?

Ezgi Dilan Özdemir,Yasemin Uslu,Ukke Karabacak,Dilek Eren,Serpil Isabetli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12968/jowc.2023.32.Sup7a.cxxviii

2023-07-01

Abstract:Objective: Operating room (OR)-related pressure injuries (PIs) constitute the majority of all hospital-acquired PIs. The aim of this study is to reveal the prevalence and risk factors of OR-related PIs. Method: This study used a cohort design. The data were collected at Acıbadem Maslak Hospital in Istanbul between November 2018 and May 2019. The study population consisted of all patients undergoing surgery between these dates (n=612). The haphazard sampling method was used following application of the inclusion criteria. A patient identification form, the 3S intraoperative pressure ulcer risk assesment scale and the Braden Scale were used to collect data. Results: Within the scope of the study, data were collected from 403 patients, of which 57.1% (n=230) were female and 42.9% (n=173) were male; mean age was 47.90±18.15 years. During surgery, PIs were detected in 8.4% of patients. In total, 42 PIs were detected in patients in the study; 92.8% were stage 1 and 7.2% were stage 2. It was determined that the PIs observed in 11.8% (n=4) of the patients were related to device/instrument use and 23.5% (n=8) were related to the positioning device. Risk factors found to be significant in the development of PIs were sex (male) (p=0.049), large amount of bleeding during surgery (p=0.001), dry (p=0.020) and lighter skin (p=0.012), duration of surgery (p=0.001), type of anaesthesia (p=0.015), and medical devices used (p=0.001). Conclusion: Early identification of risk factors may reduce OR-related PIs. Guidelines and procedures that focus on preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative evaluation can be developed to reduce and prevent surgery-related PIs and to standardise care.
Intraoperative pressure injury and risk factors in long-term surgical interventions

Büşra İpek,Yazile Sayın

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v19i3.6300

2022-09-25

Journal of Human Sciences

Abstract:Background: If the operation time is 60 minutes or longer, the patient's risk of pressure injury increases. Aim: This study aims to determine the prevalence and risk factors for intraoperatively acquired pressure injury (IAPI) in patients who underwent surgery for 60 ≥ minutes in a hospital in Turkey. Methods: The research is a cross-sectional, descriptive, prospective design. Data were collected in the perioperative period (N=200). Sociodemographic and Clinical Characteristics Form and 3S intraoperative pressure injury risk assessment scale were used for data collection. Findings: IAPI occurred in 18.0% of participants. In this study, there was a statistically significant correlation with women ([RR: relative risk]:1.242, 95%, CI [confidence interval]: 0.484-3.190) at risk of pressure injury, those with chronic diseases and those who had major surgery (RR: 11.569, 95%, CI: 2.029-65.954). In addition, the patient's position during surgery posed a 2.6 times (95% CI: 0.552-12.674) risk for pressure injury. Based on IRAS score, there was a significant relationship between the time of the operation (RR:2.051, 95% CI: 1.113-3.780), and the intraoperative stress (RR:4.338, 95% CI: 1.815-10.369) for the risk of pressure injury. Conclusion: IAPI remains a significant problem in the operating room. In this study, according to sociodemographic characteristics, being female, having a history of chronic disease and being a candidate for major surgery may cause the intraoperative pressure injury. According to 3S- IRAS, long operative time and high skin stress score may create a significant risk of intraoperative pressure injury. Perioperative nurses should assess the risk of each surgical patient and provide position support for the patient during the surgical procedure. Keywords: Surgery; pressure injury; intraoperative; risk factors; prevalence
Modeling and Prediction of Distribution System Voltage Distortion Caused by Nonlinear Residential Loads

Y. Wang,R. O’Connell,G. Brownfield

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MPER.2001.4311492

2001-07-01

IEEE Power Engineering Review

Abstract:Electric utilities have expressed concern over increased nonlinear loading of residential power distribution systems. The number and variety of power electronic products found in the typical home continues to grow rapidly, imposing a burden on local power companies to supply reliable, distortion-free service. In order to adequately prepare for the future, utilities must be able to predict the harmonic impact of new power electronic equipment and evaluate the ability of existing power systems to accommodate these nonlinear loads. This paper describes a modeling methodology that uses SPICE simulation software to predict the voltage distortion caused by nonlinear residential loads. Results of applying the methodology to a specific distribution system containing either of two different types of harmonic-rich loads, i.e., variable-speed air conditioners or electric vehicle battery chargers, are presented as well.
Customized Silicone Foam Dressing Under Noninvasive Ventilation and Skincare Bundle to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Neonates

Amanda O'Neil,Bette Schumacher,Sarah Dorr,Laura Jarding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1891/NN-2023-0070

2024-05-01

Abstract:In a sixty-eight-bed level-IV NICU, an increased incidence of hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) from noninvasive ventilation (NIV) devices was identified. The aim of this quality improvement project was to decrease HAPIs from NIV by 10%. A literature review and the Plan-Do-Study-Act were implemented. The intervention included a customized silicone foam dressing under NIV, an NIV skincare bundle, and multidisciplinary support. Hospital-acquired pressure injury rates were tracked over 3 years postinterventions. The incidence of HAPIs declined by 20% from 0.2 per 1,000 patient days to 0.05 per 1,000 patient days. Relative risk was 4.6 times greater prior to intervention (p = .04). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) failure was not noted and measured by the percentage of patients on ventilators pre- and postintervention. Customized silicone foam dressings under NIV, NIV skincare bundle, and multidisciplinary team support may decrease HAPIs in neonates without CPAP failure.
Pressure Injury Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia Surgeries

Wan-Yu Chen,Tsui-Hua Hsu,Chia-Hao Chang,Chiu-Hsiang Lee,Shu-Chien Tzeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.25270/wmp.23025

2024-01-01

Wound Management & Prevention

Abstract:Background: Pressure injuries result from prolonged pressure and lead to tissue damage, infections, extended recovery times, and an economic burden. Purpose: To explore risk factors for pressure injuries in patients who underwent surgery under general anesthesia. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery at a regional educational hospital in southern Taiwan from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2018. Results: A comprehensive multivariate analysis was used to identify the prominent risk factors for pressure injury among the 11 231 patients enrolled in this study. These risk factors were an age of ≥65 years; surgery duration of >120 minutes; diastolic blood pressure of 30 minutes during surgery; intraoperative use of dopamine, norepinephrine, or epinephrine as vasopressors; American Society of Anesthesiologists physical classification of III or higher; minimum intraoperative body temperature of ≤35°C; blood loss of >500 mL; and a supine or prone surgical position. Conclusions: This study identified several pressure injury risk factors related to surgical conditions and patient characteristics. Surgical teams must monitor, control, and manage these factors, prioritize staff education, and adopt preventive protocols.

dermatology,nursing
Thermal preconditioning can reduce the incidence of intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries

Ping Hou,Huiping Xue,Shuwen Chang,Ping Xie,Yajie Chen,Yanwei Wang,Daiji Miura,Jianglin Fan,Jingyan Liang,Akio Kitayama,Fang Fang,Haijuan Yuan,Xiaoling Wu,Xiaolin Zhang,Jing Wang,Ning Ding,Can Zhang,Xiuyun Sun,En Takashi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2023.103617

Abstract:Intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries (IAPIs) occur frequently among patients who undergo surgical procedures that last longer than 3 h. Several studies indicated that heat shock proteins (HSPs) play an important role in the protection of stress-induced damages in skin tissues. Hence, the aim of this study was to investigate the potential preventive effect of thermal preconditioning (TPC) on IAPIs in surgical patients and rats and to identify the differentially expressed HSP genes in response to the above treatment. TPC was performed on one group of hairless rats before the model of pressure injuries was established. Subsequently, the size of skin lesions was measured and the expression levels of mRNA and protein of HSPs of the pressured skin were detected by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), western blot, and immunohistochemical staining. For human studies, 118 surgical patients were randomly divided into the TPC group (n = 59) and the control group (n = 59), respectively. The temperature and pressure of sacral skin, as well as the incidence of pressure injury (PI) were detected and compared. In animal studies, TPC significantly reduced both the size and incidence of PI in rats on the second, third and fourth days post treatment. In addition, the expression levels of both mRNA and protein of HSP27 were increased in the TPC group, compared with the control group. Immunohistochemical staining showed that HSP27 was distributed in various types of dermal cells and increased in basal cells. In human studies, a significant reduction (75%) of IAPIs was observed among the patients in the TPC group. TPC can reduce the incidence of PI in rats and humans, and the upregulation of HSP27 may play an important role in this biological progress. Further studies are warranted to explore the molecular mechanism of the preventive effect in PI mediated by HSP27.

Choquet Integration on Set Systems

High body mass index is a strong predictor of intraoperative acquired pressure injury in spinal surgery patients when prophylactic film dressings are applied: A retrospective analysis prior to the BOSS Trial

The Prevalence, Incidence, And Associated Factors Of Pressure Injuries Among Immobile Inpatients: A Multicentre, Cross-Sectional, Exploratory Descriptive Study In China

Mutagenic activity of the 4,5‐ and 9,10‐dihydrodiols of benzo[J]fluoranthene and their syn‐ and anti‐dihydrodiol epoxides in salmonella typhimurium

Agreement criteria between expected and measured field fluences in IMRT of head and neck cancer: the importance and use of the gamma histograms statistical analysis.

Preventing pressure injury in open-heart surgical patients: A systematic review

Explore the effect of pressure and time of compression on the risk of intraoperatively acquired pressure injury based on theoretical framework: A prospective study

Prevention of Pressure Injuries in the Operating Room: A Quality Improvement Project

Incidence and Risk Factors of Pressure Injuries in Surgical Spinal Patients

Decreasing Intraoperative Skin Damage in Prone-Position Surgeries

An exploratory study of risk factors for pressure injury in patients undergoing spine surgery

Incidence of and risk factors for self-load-related and medical device-related pressure injuries in critically ill patients: A prospective observational cohort study

The effect of support surface on the prevention of pressure injury in acute care settings: a multi-center prospective observational study

Pressure Injury Prevention in Cardiac Surgery Using Risk Factor Assessment and Standardization

Factors Associated With Perioperative Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery in the Prone Position: A Prospective Observational Study

Pressure injuries in the operating room: who are at risk?

Intraoperative pressure injury and risk factors in long-term surgical interventions

Modeling and Prediction of Distribution System Voltage Distortion Caused by Nonlinear Residential Loads

Customized Silicone Foam Dressing Under Noninvasive Ventilation and Skincare Bundle to Reduce Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Neonates

Pressure Injury Risk Factors in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia Surgeries

Thermal preconditioning can reduce the incidence of intraoperatively acquired pressure injuries