Abstract:Introduction: Combining audiovisual decision support during perioperative critical events might enhance provider diagnostic and therapeutic accuracy and efficiency. Methods: This study is a prospective, randomized controlled pilot trial studying the impact of audiovisual decision support on anesthesia professional performance at NorthShore University HealthSystem's high fidelity simulation center. Twenty anesthesia professionals (>2 years of clinical experience in the current role) were randomized to 2 groups (current care model vs. audiovisual assistance) and underwent 3 periprocedural simulation scenarios, where patient deterioration occurs: anaphylaxis, amniotic fluid embolism, and cardiac arrest during dental case. Results: Overall, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean and median pooled times to diagnosis in both the amniotic fluid embolism and pediatric dental scenarios. There was a statistically significant increase in the number of participants in the intervention group who made diagnosis 3 before the end of the scene ( P = 0.03) in the amniotic fluid embolism case. In the pediatric dental case, there was a statistically significant reduction in the median time to diagnosis 1 and diagnosis 3 in the intervention group versus control ( P = 0.01 and P = 0.0002). A significant increase in the number of participants in the intervention group versus control made the correct diagnosis 2 before vital sign change 3 ( P = 0.03), and more participants in the intervention group made the correct diagnosis 3 before the end of the scene when compared with control ( P = 0.001). The median time to start intervention 2 during the dental case was statistically significantly greater in the intervention group versus the control ( P = 0.05). All other endpoints were not statistically significant among the 3 simulation scenarios. Six questions were answered by all participants upon immediate completion of the simulation scenarios and revealed that 19 of 20 participants had delivered anesthesia care to patients similar to the 3 simulation scenarios and 18 of 20 participants reported that they would prefer audiovisual assistance to detect abnormalities in vital signs that subsequently provides appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic options. Conclusions: This pilot study suggested some significant improvement in anesthesia professional time to correct diagnosis and completion of identification of the correct diagnosis before the next vital change in the audiovisual cue group versus control, particularly in the outpatient dental case. In addition, the mean and median pooled times to diagnosis were significantly reduced by approximately 1 minute in both evaluated simulation scenarios. The postsimulation survey responses also suggest the desirability of an audiovisual decision support tool among the current anesthesia professional participants. However, overall, there were no significant differences in the time to intervention between groups in all simulation scenarios.

Three-Phase Video-Assisted Multidisciplinary Team Debriefing in High-Fidelity Blast Simulation through the Advocacy and Inquiry Method

The evaluation of video-assisted debriefing for improving performance in simulated medical student resuscitations

Effectiveness of Video-Assisted Debriefing versus Oral Debriefing in Simulation-Based Interdisciplinary Health Professions Education: a randomized trial

Evaluation of nursing process competencies, nursing quality, and patient safety using virtual simulation with debriefing: A quasi-experimental study

Debriefing 101: training faculty to promote learning in simulation-based training

Interdisciplinary Simulation Courses to Train Residents on Communication of Unexpected Complications from Perioperative Care: A Randomized Comparison of Within-Event (Microdebriefing) and Postscenario Debriefing

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Simulation Study to Investigate the Effect of Audiovisual Decision Support on Diagnosis and Therapeutic Interventions

Design, development, and evaluation of an online virtual emergency department for training trauma teams

Implementation of an in situ qualitative debriefing tool for resuscitations

Innovative Insights: Teaching Best Debriefing Practices Through Debriefing the Debrief

Evaluating Debriefing Encounters of Emergency Medical Practitioners in Remote Simulations and Standardized Patient Scenarios

Data-informed debriefing for cardiopulmonary arrest: A randomized controlled trial

Use of an electronic documentation module to improve surgical debriefing effectiveness

Strategies for case-based training with virtual patients: An experimental study of the impact of integrating mental model articulation and self-reflection

Impact of video recordings review with structured debriefings on trauma team performance: a prospective observational cohort study

Video-assisted self-reflection of resuscitations for resident education and improvement of leadership skills: A pilot study

Simulation-Based Training in Clinical Event Debriefing Improves Leadership Performance

Ready Medic One: A Feasibility Study of a Semi-Autonomous Virtual Reality Trauma Simulator

Veterinary High-Stakes Immersive Simulation Training With Repeat Practice Following Structured Debriefing Improves Students' Ability to Cope With High-Pressure Situations

Interprofessional Team Training With Virtual Reality: Acceptance, Learning Outcome, and Feasibility Evaluation Study

Using OR Black Box Technology to Determine Quality Improvement Outcomes for In-situ Timeout and Debrief Simulation