Abstract:Transforming wildlife management institutions at the cultural level to increase alignment with diverse worldviews can improve relations with Indigenous Peoples and the implementation of Indigenous Knowledges within management. 3 priorities to facilitate this cultural shift are: reconciling historical legacies and power imbalances, moving beyond attempts to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and building reciprocal, accountable relations with Indigenous Peoples. Within governance agencies, academia, and communities alike, there are increasing calls to recognize the value and importance of culture within social‐ecological systems and to better implement Indigenous sciences in research, policy, and management. Efforts thus far have raised questions about the best ethical practices to do so. Engaging with plural worldviews and perspectives on their own terms reflects cultural evolutionary processes driving paradigm shifts in 3 fundamental areas of natural resource management: conceptualizations of natural resources and ecosystems, processes of public participation and governance, and relationships with Indigenous Peoples and communities with differing worldviews. We broadly describe evolution toward these paradigm shifts in fish and wildlife management. We then use 3 case studies to illustrate the ongoing cultural evolution of relationships between wildlife management and Indigenous practices within specific historical and social‐ecological contexts and reflect on common barriers to appropriately engaging with Indigenous paradigms and lifeways. Our case studies highlight 3 priorities that can assist the field of wildlife management in achieving the changes necessary to bridge incommensurable worldviews: acknowledging and reconciling historical legacies and their continued power dynamics as part of social‐ecological systems, establishing governance arrangements that move beyond attempts to extract cultural information from communities to integrate Indigenous Knowledges into dominant management paradigms, and engaging in critical reflexivity and reciprocal, accountable relationship building. Implementing these changes will take time and a commitment to processes that may initially feel uncomfortable and unfamiliar but have potential to be transformative. Ethical and culturally appropriate methods to include plural and multivocal perspectives and worldviews on their own terms are needed to transform wildlife management to achieve more effective and just management outcomes for all.

Building human-dimensions/social science capacity to support wildlife agencies: lessons from New York's 50-year experience

Trends in human dimensions of wildlife at Cornell University: 50 years and counting

Integrating the human dimensions into fish and wildlife management depends on increasing managers' social science fluency

The first 25-years of Human Dimensions of Wildlife: a scoping review

The wildlife attitude-acceptability framework's potential to inform human dimensions of wildlife science and practice

Evolving wildlife management cultures of governance through Indigenous Knowledges and perspectives

Urban wildlife ecology and conservation:A brief history of the discipline

Ratcheting up Rigor in Wildlife Management Decision Making

Conservation through connection: Approaches to engaging communities in applied grizzly bear research

Unpacking the challenges of wildlife governance in community‐based conservation programs to promote human–wildlife coexistence

Knowing Your Field Community: Elevating the Human Dimension in Ecological Research and Teaching

On the Cutting Edge of Research to Conserve At-Risk Species: Maximizing Impact through Partnerships

Mapping social conflicts to enhance the integrated management of white‐tailed deer ( Odocoileus virginianus )

Exploring the emergence of a tipping point for conservation with increased recognition of social considerations

Roles for Wildlife in the Development of Place Meanings Ascribed to a Protected Area

Strengthening urban deer management with structured decision making

Using applied social science disciplines to implement creative outdoor cat management solutions and avoid the trap of one-size-fits-all policies

Wildlife Conservation on Private Land: A Social-Ecological Systems Study

Mammal Mia: a review on how ecological and human dimension research on urban wild mammals can benefit future biophilic cities

The significance of meaning. Why IPBES needs the social sciences and humanities

Introduction: Human-nature interactions through a multispecies lens