Comparative analysis of nascent RNA sequencing methods and their applications in studies of cotranscriptional splicing dynamics

Min Liu,Jiafu Zhu,Huijuan Huang,Yan Chen,Zhicheng Dong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koad237

2023-11-30

Abstract:High-throughput detection of nascent RNA is critical for studies of transcription and much more challenging than that of mRNA. Recently, several massively parallel nascent RNA sequencing methods were established in eukaryotic cells. Here, we systematically compared 3 classes of methods on the same pure or crude nuclei preparations: GRO-seq for sequence nuclear run-on RNAs, pNET-seq for sequence RNA polymerase II-associated RNAs, and CB RNA-seq for sequence chromatin-bound (CB) RNAs in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). To improve the resolution of CB RNAs, 3'CB RNA-seq was established to sequence the 3' ends of CB RNAs. In addition, we modified pNET-seq to establish the Chromatin Native Elongation Transcript sequencing (ChrNET) method using chromatin as the starting material for RNA immunoprecipitation. Reproducibility, sensitivity and accuracy in detecting nascent transcripts, experimental procedures, and costs were analyzed, which revealed the strengths and weaknesses of each method. We found that pNET and GRO methods best detected active RNA polymerase II. CB RNA-seq is a simple and cost-effective alternative for nascent RNA studies, due to its high correlation with pNET-seq and GRO-seq. Compared with pNET, ChrNET has higher specificity for nascent RNA capture and lower sequencing cost. 3'CB is sensitive to transcription-coupled splicing. Using these methods, we identified 1,404 unknown transcripts, 4,482 unannotated splicing events, and 60 potential recursive splicing events. This comprehensive comparison of different nascent/chromatin RNA sequencing methods highlights the strengths of each method and serves as a guide for researchers aiming to select a method that best meets their study goals.