Biocontrol of Carp: The Australian Plan Does Not Stand Up to a Rational Analysis of Safety and Efficacy
Maxime Boutier,Owen Donohoe,R. Keller Kopf,Paul Humphries,Joy A. Becker,Jonathan Marshall,Alain Vanderplasschen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00882
IF: 5.2
2019-04-30
Frontiers in Microbiology
Abstract:<h1>Biocontrol of Carp: The Australian Plan Does Not Stand Up to a Rational Analysis of Safety and Efficacy</h1><a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/653220">Maxime Boutier</a><sup>1</sup>, <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/662129">Owen Donohoe</a><sup>1,2</sup>, <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/654951">R. Keller Kopf</a><sup>3</sup>, <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/653330">Paul Humphries</a><sup>3</sup>, <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/345329">Joy A. Becker</a><sup>4</sup>, <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/653946">Jonathan Marshall</a><sup>5,6</sup> and <a href="http://www.frontiersin.org/people/u/653162">Alain Vanderplasschen</a><sup>1</sup><sup>*</sup><ul><li><span><sup>1</sup></span>Department of Parasitic and Infectious Diseases, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium</li><li><span><sup>2</sup></span>Bioscience Research Institute, Athlone Institute of Technology, Athlone, Ireland</li><li><span><sup>3</sup></span>School of Environmental Sciences, Institute for Land Water & Society, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW, Australia</li><li><span><sup>4</sup></span>Faculty of Science, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, The University of Sydney, Camden, NSW, Australia</li><li><span><sup>5</sup></span>Queensland Department of Environment and Science, Water Planning Ecology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia</li><li><span><sup>6</sup></span>Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia</li></ul><h2>The Australian Plan for Biocontrol of Invasive Carp Using Cyprinid Herpesvirus 3</h2><p>Common carp (<i>Cyprinus carpio</i>), hereafter referred as carp, is one of the most widely cultured fish produced for food globally. It was introduced into Australia for aquaculture in the mid-nineteenth century (<a href="#B17">Lintermans, 2004</a>). Following floods in the 1970's, carp became abundant and widespread in many Australian waterways where it has come to comprise a large proportion of the fish fauna of these ecosystems (<a href="#B14">Koehn, 2004</a>). To reduce carp population abundance and aid native species recovery, the Australian Government is evaluating the release of cyprinid herpesvirus 3 [CyHV-3, also known as koi herpesvirus (KHV)] presumed to be absent from Australia (<a href="#B22">NCCP, 2017</a>). CyHV-3 emerged in the mid 1990's and since that time has devastated carp production worldwide (<a href="#B4">Boutier et al., 2015</a>). Due to its economic impact on aquaculture, the Word Organization for Animal Health requires notification when the virus is identified.</p><h2>Potential Safety Concerns Associated With the Use of CyHV-3 as a Biocontrol Agent</h2><p>Following carp mortality caused by CyHV-3, decomposing dead fish could itself lead to undesirable environmental damage (<a href="#B16">Lighten and van Oosterhout, 2017</a>). A detailed analysis of this indirect risk vs the potential benefits of the use of CyHV-3 is published elsewhere (<a href="#B15">Kopf et al., 2019</a>). The virus may also cause direct deleterious effects by infection of non-target species.</p><p>Herpesviruses have mainly evolved by co-speciation with their host, leading to a narrow host range restricted to their natural host species and closely related species (<a href="#B37">Waltzek et al., 2009</a>). Consistently, it has been demonstrated that CyHV-3 causes mortality only in common and koi carp. However, the ability of the virus to establish subclinical infection in non-natural host species, to persist and to be transmitted from the latter to naïve cohabitant carp has been suggested based on PCR analyses (<a href="#B13">Kempter et al., 2012</a>; <a href="#B8">Fabian et al., 2013</a>, <a href="#B7">2016</a>). The biological relevance of these data should be taken with caution as the signals observed were weak and the transmission to sentinel carp was never associated with the expression of CyHV-3 disease. The risk of CyHV-3 infecting non-target species of Australia was investigated in limited experimental conditions in a recent paper (<a href="#B21">McColl et al., 2017</a>). Importantly, the results of that study indicate that CyHV-3 may have induced mortality in at least some native fish species [e.g. silver perch (<i>Bidyanus bidyanus</i>)] in Australia. <a href="#B21">McColl et al. (2017)</a> ignored the potential role of CyHV-3 in the deaths observed (including in the groups where mortality was significantly higher in infected than in mock-infected groups) by presenting data suggesting that viral transcripts could not be detected in dead fish. The possibility of technical issues or the hypothesis that CyHV-3 could induce death in non-natural host species through a non-replicative pathogenesis, as observed for other herpesviruses (e.g., alcelaphine herpesvirus 1) (<a href="#B23">Palmeira et al., 2013</a>), were not addressed. For these reasons, the data published by <a h <p>-Abstract Truncated-</p>
microbiology