Energy expenditure in wild birds
D. Bryant
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS19970107
1997-11-01
Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
Abstract:Allometric scaling of energy metabolism is one of the most familiar and robust models in biology (Brody, 1945; Kleiber, 1975; Calder, 1984), although its cause remains contentious (West et al. 1997). Energy requirements of animals are often calculated assuming metabolism scales as a 0.67 or 0.75 power of body mass (Peters, 1983; Brown & Maurer, 1986). Yet, the practices and assumptions of this approach will often be inadequate if the goal is precise prediction of energy expenditure or requirements at the species level. This is because organismal and environmental influences on avian metabolism are ubiquitous, both regarding their effect on basal energy requirements (Aschoff & Pohl, 1970; Bennett & Harvey, 1987) and, more pertinently in the present context, on expenditure of energy by free-living individuals (Walsberg, 1983; Nagy, 1987; Bryant & Tatner, 1991). It is important, therefore, to identify factors, additional to those simply allied with body mass, which account for this variation. Identification of significant categorical factors affecting energy expenditure has been a main concern to date. A study of interspecies variation in mammalian energetics, for example, showed that desert dwellers had generally low field (free-living) metabolic rates but identified no other significant factors (Nagy, 1994). Amongst birds, desert dwellers and sea-birds stand apart from others, with respectively low and high field metabolic rates (Nagy, 1987). Also, some studies have indicated that aerial-feeding birds, including hummingbirds, have a relatively high field metabolism (Walsberg, 1983). Nevertheless, very few reliable predictor variables of wide applicability are available to explain interspecies variation in energy expenditure, either for wild birds or mammals. The present study has the general aim of accounting for interspecies variation in energy expenditure of birds. More specifically, it confirms that metabolic scaling with body mass (W) remains pre-eminent in explaining energy expenditure amongst wild birds, even when W only varies across about an order of magnitude. The main aim, however, is to identify and evaluate other factors which predict variation in energy expenditure amongst free-living birds.