Abstract:Background: Fetal growth restriction is associated with an increased risk for adverse neonatal outcomes. The Hadlock singleton growth reference is widely used to determine the estimated fetal weight percentile for both twin and singleton gestations. The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's twin-specific growth reference accounts for the different growth trajectory that twins follow during gestation. There is a lack of research comparing these different growth references in their ability to identify fetal growth restriction that is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin gestations. Objective: This study aimed to compare a twin-specific growth reference (the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's twin-specific growth reference) and a singleton growth reference (Hadlock) in their ability to identify fetal growth restriction associated with adverse neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin gestations. Study design: This was a retrospective cohort study of dichorionic twin gestations at ≥32 weeks' gestation delivered at a single institution between 2004 and 2019 with the serial growth ultrasounds and neonatal outcomes data available for analysis. Using their last growth ultrasound before delivery, twins were classified into the following 3 categories: fetal growth restriction according to both the Hadlock and Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development references, fetal growth restriction according to the Hadlock reference only, and no fetal growth restriction according to either reference, with fetal growth restriction defined as an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile for gestational age. Multivariable generalized linear mixed models were used to assess the adverse neonatal outcomes via pair-wise comparisons between the groups, with a random-effects component to account for twin-pair correlations. Results: A total of 1460 dichorionic twin infants were included with 8.1% (n=118) of cases classified as fetal growth restricted by both the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and Hadlock references, 8.8% (n=129) of cases classified as fetal growth restricted by the Hadlock reference only, and 83.1% (n=1213) of cases classified as no fetal growth restriction by either reference. Compared with twins with no fetal growth restriction by either reference, twins with fetal growth restriction by both references were more likely to experience mild (adjusted odds ratio, 2.38; confidence interval, 1.38-4.13) or severe (adjusted odds ratio, 2.82; confidence interval, 1.16-6.88) composite neonatal morbidity. Compared with twins with fetal growth restriction according to the Hadlock reference only, twins with fetal growth restriction according to both references were more likely to experience mild (adjusted odds ratio, 2.03; confidence interval, 1.00-4.14) but not severe (adjusted odds ratio, 3.70; confidence interval, 0.72-18.90) composite neonatal morbidity. Composite neonatal morbidity was not different between twins with fetal growth restriction according to the Hadlock reference only and those with no fetal growth restriction by either growth reference. Conclusion: The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development's twin-specific growth reference better identifies the risk for adverse neonatal outcomes in dichorionic twin gestations diagnosed with fetal growth restriction. The use of the Hadlock singleton growth reference more than doubles the number of dichorionic twins identified with fetal growth restriction who seem to be at a low-risk for neonatal morbidity, leading to unnecessary maternal anxiety, increased antenatal testing, and possibly iatrogenic preterm delivery.

Fetal growth restriction inhibits childhood growth despite catch-up in discordant identical twins: an observational cohort study

Reduced lung function during childhood in identical twins with discordant fetal growth: a cohort study

Does Catch-Up Growth Come with a Cognitive Cost? Cognitive Outcome and Growth Patterns in Growth Discordant Identical Twins

Association between fetal growth-restriction and retinopathy of prematurity using a unique identical twin model

Cognitive outcome in childhood of birth weight discordant monochorionic twins: the long-term effects of fetal growth restriction

Insecure attachment and internalizing behavior problems in growth discordant identical twins

Dichorionic twin-specific vs singleton growth references for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction

Neuro-developmental outcome of a large cohort of growth discordant twins

Association between antenatal diagnosis of late fetal growth restriction and educational outcomes in mid-childhood: A UK prospective cohort study with long-term data linkage study

Fetal Adiponectin and Resistin in Correlation with Birth Weight Difference in Monozygotic Twins with Discordant Growth

Cord Blood Adiponectin and Leptin Concentrations in Monochorionic Twins with Selective Intrauterine Growth Restriction and Their Associations with Childhood Growth Trajectories

Paediatric consequences of fetal growth restriction

The effects of intrauterine growth on physical and intellectual development of one-year-old infants: a study on monochorionic twins with selective intrauterine growth restriction

The Growth Restriction Intervention Trial: long-term outcomes in a randomized trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction

Unfavourable intrauterine environment contributes to abnormal gut microbiome and metabolome in twins

A cohort study of fetal growth in twin pregnancies by chorionicity: comparison with European and American standards

The Delphi definition for selective fetal growth restriction may not improve detection of pathologic growth discordance in monochorionic twins

Fetal Growth Trajectories of Small/large for Gestational Age Infants in Twin Pregnancies

Behavior and circadian glucocorticoids in prepubertal monozygotic twins with birthweight differences: A prospective longitudinal cohort study on twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome patients

Physical growth and cognitive abilities in concordant versus discordant birth weight twins at three years old

Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction