Abstract:Newly formed memories are not passively stored for future retrieval; rather, they are reactivated offline and thereby strengthened and transformed. However, reactivation is not a uniform process: it occurs throughout different states of consciousness, including conscious rehearsal during wakefulness and unconscious processing during both wakefulness and sleep. In this study, we explore the consequences of reactivation during conscious and unconscious awake states. Forty-one participants learned associations consisting of adjective-object-position triads. Objects were clustered into distinct semantic groups (e.g., multiple fruits, vehicles, musical instruments) which allowed us to examine the consequences of reactivation on semantically-related memories. After an extensive learning phase, some triads were reactivated consciously, through cued retrieval, or unconsciously, through subliminal priming. In both conditions, the adjective was used as the cue. Reactivation impacted memory for the most distal association (i.e., the spatial position of associated objects) in a consciousness-dependent and memory-strength-dependent manner. First, conscious reactivation of a triad resulted in a weakening of other semantically related memories, but only those that were initially more accurate (i.e., memories with lower pre-reactivation spatial errors). This is similar to what has been previously demonstrated in studies employing retrieval-induced forgetting designs. Unconscious reactivation, on the other hand, benefited memory selectively for weak cued items. Semantically linked associations were not impaired, but rather integrated with the reactivated memory. Taken together, our results demonstrate that conscious and unconscious reactivation of memories during wakefulness have qualitatively different consequences on memory for distal associations. Effects are memory-strength-dependent, as has been shown for reactivation during sleep. Results support a consciousness-dependent inhibition account, according to which unconscious reactivation involves less inhibitory dynamics than conscious reactivation, thus allowing more liberal spread of activation. Our findings set the stage for additional exploration into the role of consciousness in memory structuring.

The reach of reactivation: Effects of consciously-triggered versus unconsciously-triggered reactivation of associative memory

The reach of reactivation: Effects of consciously triggered versus unconsciously triggered reactivation of associative memory

Memory reactivation during sleep does not act holistically on object memory

Memory reactivation generates new, adaptive behaviours that reach beyond direct experience

Recurring memory reactivation: The offline component of learning

Targeted memory reactivation elicits temporally compressed reactivation linked to spindles

Awake targeted memory reactivation doesn't work

Accessing without remembering: memory consolidation of information at the focus of awareness is optional

Study-Phase Reinstatement: Encoding Spontaneous Thoughts as Memories

Repetition dynamically and rapidly increases cortical, but not hippocampal, offline reactivation

Reactivation strength during cued recall is modulated by graph distance within cognitive maps

Targeted memory reactivation during sleep boosts intentional forgetting of spatial locations

Effects of Targeted Memory Reactivation on Cortical Networks

Targeted memory reactivation during sleep can induce forgetting of overlapping memories

Delineating memory reactivation in sleep with verbal and non-verbal retrieval cues

The persistence of memory: prior memory responses modulate behavior and brain state engagement

Remembering what is relevant: how is goal-directed memory reactivation supported by attentional selection?

Structured and unstructured reactivations during REM sleep are modulated by novel experiences

Cortical Reactivations Modulated by Local Inhibitory Circuits Mediate Memory Consolidation