Abstract:Abstract Introduction A substantial literature supports that sleep biases memory consolidation and retrieval for emotionally-salient stimuli. A smaller, yet growing, literature supports that information deemed relevant to future events may also be favored by sleep consolidation processes. However, it is unclear whether both emotion and predictability would act together to bias sleep-dependent memory formation. Here, we utilized a directed forgetting paradigm with negative and neutral word pairs to examine this open question. Methods Sixty young and healthy adults were exposed to word pair stimuli before a polysomnographically-recorded nap. Before the nap, participants were instructed to remember half of the word pairs presented for a later test, and for the other half of word pairs, participants were told to forget them as there would not be a test on them later. Additionally, during encoding, half of the subjects in the sample were exposed to negative valenced, high arousal word pairs while the other half were exposed to neutral, low arousal word pairs. After the nap, subjects were tested on all word pairs presented, regardless of previous instruction. This also included a set of novel word pairs to which participants had not been previously exposed. Results A series of 2x2 mixed measures ANOVAs revealed that individuals had better accuracy (p<.001) and fewer misses (p<.001) for the words they were told to remember compared to those they were instructed to forget. Additionally, participants had relatively few false alarms to novel stimuli, 7.14 times, on average (SD=6.10), out of a possible 50 word pairs. Importantly, contrary to predictions, post-nap performance was not dependent on the word pair valence (interaction p’s>.70). No correlations between sleep stages and memory emerged. Conclusion These findings suggest that predictability of future events may be a relevant catalyst for sleep-related memory processing. Support This work was supported by an Office of Naval Research Young Investigators Award to Sara Mednick and a National Institutes of Mental Health Training grant to Lauren Whitehurst T32MH019391.

Targeted memory reactivation during sleep boosts intentional forgetting of spatial locations

Targeted memory reactivation with sleep disruption does not weaken week-old memories

Targeted memory reactivation during sleep can induce forgetting of overlapping memories

Aversive memories can be weakened during human sleep via the reactivation of positive interfering memories

Delineating memory reactivation in sleep with verbal and non-verbal retrieval cues

Awake targeted memory reactivation doesn't work

Targeted memory reactivation of face-name learning depends on ample and undisturbed slow-wave sleep

Memory reactivation during sleep does not act holistically on object memory

Brief Change in Dopamine Activity during Consolidation Impairs Long-Term Memory via Sleep Disruption

Targeted Memory Reactivation during Nonrapid Eye Movement Sleep Enhances Neutral, But Not Negative, Components of Memory

The reach of reactivation: Effects of consciously triggered versus unconsciously triggered reactivation of associative memory

Study While You Sleep: Using Targeted Memory Reactivation as an Independent Research Project for Undergraduates

Sleep to remember, sleep to forget: Rapid eye movement sleep can have inverse effects on recall and generalization of fear memories

Inducing forgetting of unwanted memories through subliminal reactivation

0096 Future-Relevant Information is Enhanced After Sleep Despite Emotional Salience of Stimuli

A brain pathway for active forgetting

Does memory reactivation during sleep support generalization at the cost of memory specifics?

Classical music, educational learning, and slow wave sleep: A targeted memory reactivation experiment

Memory and Sleep: How Sleep Cognition Can Change the Waking Mind for the Better

Memory reactivation in slow wave sleep enhances relational learning in humans