Abstract:Abstract Background Research misconduct and questionable research practices have been the subject of increasing attention in the past few years. But despite the rich body of research available, few empirical works also include the perspectives of non-researcher stakeholders. Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews and focus groups with policy makers, funders, institution leaders, editors or publishers, research integrity office members, research integrity community members, laboratory technicians, researchers, research students, and former-researchers who changed career to inquire on the topics of success, integrity, and responsibilities in science. We used the Flemish biomedical landscape as a baseline to be able to grasp the views of interacting and complementary actors in a system setting. Results Given the breadth of our results, we divided our findings in a two-paper series with the current paper focusing on the problems that affect the integrity and research culture. We first found that different actors have different perspectives on the problems that affect the integrity and culture of research. Problems were either linked to personalities and attitudes, or to the climates in which researchers operate. Elements that were described as essential for success (in the associate paper) were often thought to accentuate the problems of research climates by disrupting research culture and research integrity. Even though all participants agreed that current research climates need to be addressed, participants generally did not feel responsible nor capable of initiating change. Instead, respondents revealed a circle of blame and mistrust between actor groups. Conclusions Our findings resonate with recent debates, and extrapolate a few action points which might help advance the discussion. First, the research integrity debate must revisit and tackle the way in which researchers are assessed. Second, approaches to promote better science need to address the impact that research climates have on research integrity and research culture rather than to capitalize on individual researchers’ compliance. Finally, inter-actor dialogues and shared decision making must be given priority to ensure that the perspectives of the full research system are captured. Understanding the relations and interdependency between these perspectives is key to be able to address the problems of science. Study registration https://osf.io/33v3m

Ethical decision-making and role conflict in managing a scientific laboratory

Team Factors in Ethical Decision Making: A Content Analysis of Interviews with Scientists and Engineers

Reflections on Scientific Misconduct in Management: Unfortunate Incidents or a Normative Crisis?

The Effect of Value-Focused Discussions on Scientists' Ethical Decision Making

Exploring researchers' perspectives on authorship decision making

Behavioral Ethics at Work: A Move Towards Developing Interventions That Mitigate Unethicality

Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work.

Decision making with conflicting information: influencing factors and best practice guidelines

Scientist's Role Choice in Decision-making: With Comments on Honest Broker

The Cultural Production of Everyday Ethics in Two University STEM Labs

Rethinking success, integrity, and culture in research (part 2) — a multi-actor qualitative study on problems of science

[Conflicts of Interest in Research and Clinical Practice]

Student views on the culture of STEM research laboratories: Results from an interview study

Researchers' Perceptions of Ethical Authorship Distribution in Collaborative Research Teams

Conflict in moral and nonmoral decision making: an empirical study coupled with a computational model

A Model Of Group Decision-Making Process: Research On The Impacts Of Group Leadership And Group Conflicts

Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations.

Conflict(s) of interest in peer review: its origins and possible solutions

Fostering Responsible Conduct of Research for Early-Stage Investigators: Challenges and Opportunities

What Future Engineers and Scientists Learn About Ethics

How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety