Oral mucositis in head and neck cancer.

M. Rastogi,Raghav C Dwivedi,R. Kazi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2354.2011.01243.x

IF: 2.1

2011-03-01

European Journal of Cancer Care

Abstract:This module explores the risk factors, pathogenesis and development of oral mucositis. It considers the early diagnosis and accurate management of oral mucositis in head and cancer patients undergoing treatment.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

PI3K/Akt inhibition modulates multidrug resistance and activates NF-kappaB in murine lymphoma cell lines.

Mariana G Garcia,L. Alaniz,R. C. Cordo Russo,É. Álvarez,S. Hajos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2008.06.010

2009-02-01

Abstract:
The Effect of Value-Focused Discussions on Scientists' Ethical Decision Making

Tyler Garcia,Bill Bridges,Caitlin Solis,Caleb Linville,Wyatt Jones,Scott Tanona,Jonathan Herington,James T. Laverty

2024-01-12

Abstract:Many scientists view science as value-free, despite the fact that both epistemic and non-epistemic values structure scientific inquiry. Current ethics training usually focuses on transmitting knowledge about high-level ethical concepts or rules and is widely regarded as ineffective. We argue that ethics training will be more effective at improving ethical decision making if it focuses on connecting values to science. We pull from philosophy and psychology to define ethical decision making using the Four Component Model. This model states that in order to make an ethical decision someone must consider four components: moral sensitivity, moral reasoning, moral motivation, and moral implementation. We formed a moderated fellowship of fourteen science faculty from different disciplines who met for ten sessions over the course of a year, where they discussed the values embedded in different scientific norms. We then conducted interviews before and after the year-long fellowship that involved guided reflection of scenarios where there was some kind of ethical misconduct where the scientific practice required value judgements (e.g using unpublished data in their own work). We looked at how the fellowship affected the scientists' ability to recognize ethical dimensions regarding the scenarios. We found that this fellowship improved moral sensitivity, but their moral reasoning does not improve. We outlined our approach on how to look at scientists' ethical decision making and made recommendations on how to improve our approach. This work can inform future ethical training to align better with what scientists value and introduce useful concepts from philosophy and psychology to education research in physics.

Physics Education,History and Philosophy of Physics,Physics and Society
Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work.

Jennifer J. Kish-Gephart,David A. Harrison,Linda Klebe Treviño

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017103

IF: 11.8025

2010-01-01

Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract:As corporate scandals proliferate, practitioners and researchers alike need a cumulative, quantitative understanding of the antecedents associated with unethical decisions in organizations. In this meta-analysis, the authors draw from over 30 years of research and multiple literatures to examine individual ("bad apple"), moral issue ("bad case"), and organizational environment ("bad barrel") antecedents of unethical choice. Findings provide empirical support for several foundational theories and paint a clearer picture of relationships characterized by mixed results. Structural equation modeling revealed the complexity (multidetermined nature) of unethical choice, as well as a need for research that simultaneously examines different sets of antecedents. Moderator analyses unexpectedly uncovered better prediction of unethical behavior than of intention for several variables. This suggests a need to more strongly consider a new "ethical impulse" perspective in addition to the traditional "ethical calculus" perspective. Results serve as a data-based foundation and guide for future theoretical and empirical development in the domain of behavioral ethics.

psychology, applied,management
Decision making with conflicting information: influencing factors and best practice guidelines

Meredith B. Carroll,Paige L. Sanchez

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2020.1764660

2020-05-29

Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science

Abstract:As mobile and sensor technology become more prevalent, performers across a range of tasks have access to redundant information sources with the potential to provide conflicting information. There is currently not a consolidated body of literature that examines decision making with conflicting information and there is a need to understand what factors influence this decision-making process. The aim of this effort was to integrate findings from the literature, across a range of domains such as aviation, medical, and military, that examined how individuals make decisions when faced with conflicting information, and to provide practical guidance for optimizing decision making in these circumstances. System factors of reliability, transparency, and workload; individual factors of experience, system trust, and training; and task/environment factors of time pressure, risk, take-action tendency, type of conflict, and task difficulty were shown to be influencing factors. This paper provides a first step towards understanding this decision making process and guidelines to promote effective decision making in increasingly information-rich environments. Applying these guidelines will help provide performers, ranging from pilots to medical practitioners, with the knowledge and tools they need to assimilate information from multiple sources, accurately assess the situation, and make effective decisions.
Scientist's Role Choice in Decision-making: With Comments on Honest Broker

YIN Xuehui,LI Zhengfeng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.15994/j.1000-0763.2012.04.013

2012-01-01

Abstract:The scientist's expertise is playing an increasingly important role in contemporary policy-making, but his role in decision-making is meeting a variety of challenges.Scientist's role choice in decision-making is related to specific decision situations,and also to his view on science and democracy.Roger A.Pielke, Jr.divided scientists who are involved in political process into four ideal types in his book Honest Broker: pure scientist, science arbiter, issue advocate and honest broker of policy alternatives.In his opinion, honest broker will be the more reliable and impactful choice for scientists to play a role in political affairs.This paper conducts critical investigation into the theoretical basis of this role-distinction, and discusses further the prerequisite for honest brokers to exist and work.
The Cultural Production of Everyday Ethics in Two University STEM Labs

Allison Mickel,Adam Heidebrink-Bruno,Amin Hosseiny Marani,Isabel Barone,Olivia Lee,Eric P.S. Baumer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02704676231181030

2023-06-18

Abstract:How do ethics show up in the everyday behaviors and conversations of researchers in a scientific laboratory? How does the microcosmic culture of the laboratory shape researchers’ understandings of scientific ethics? We, an interdisciplinary team representing anthropology, computer science, and rhetorical studies, investigated these questions in two university STEM labs. Similar to previous work mapping out the epistemic cultures, we sought to understand the ethical cultures of these research groups. We observed their lab meetings for several months and conducted interviews with members of the research laboratories. Ultimately, we recognized two distinct ethical cultures within the two laboratories: one focused on the relationship between science and social justice, and the other focused on clean data and accuracy as an ethical issue. These two distinct ethical cultures were discernable through ethnography, close reading of laboratory members’ language, as well as broad-scale topic modeling. Our project complements previous studies of ethics in science that have focused on codes of ethics or student curricula as ways in which scientists develop an understanding of scientific ethics. Our project demonstrates that everyday interactions between the members of scientific research labs additionally shape, at a decidedly local level, how scientists understand and ultimately approach ethical decision-making in the scientific research process.
[Conflicts of Interest in Research and Clinical Practice]

Ji Hoon Shin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3348/jksr.2022.0050

Abstract:Recently, doctors and researchers are establishing relationships with interested parties from companies, research institutes, health care institutions, and academic journals, instead of conducting independent medical care or research work. They may have multiple interests as an advisor or a shareholder in the relevant company. Such a situation can foster a conflict of interest when their interests influence one's decision or judgment. Conflict of interest is an extremely important issue because it can infringe the integrity of research, endanger subjects or patients, pose a risk to the public, and deteriorate public perception of science. This brief review explores the definition, examples, and solutions to conflict of interest.
Student views on the culture of STEM research laboratories: Results from an interview study

Elisabeth Hildt,Kelly Laas,Stephanie Taylor,Christine Z. Miller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2109018

2022-08-08

Accountability in Research

Abstract:In this article, we present the results of 30 ethnographic interviews in which we asked STEM graduate and undergraduate students at a Midwest university in the United States about topics related to the culture of their research group, how group members communicate and interact, and their experience with ethical issues that arise within the laboratory. Here we focus on the culture of research laboratories and describe the key categories that emerged through analysis, including communication, community structure, governance, and collaboration that influence and shape lab culture. We also consider the critical role of the principal investigator (PI) to influence conditions in the lab that facilitate or inhibit lab culture and the subsequent effects on student feelings and behaviors, interpersonal communication, collaboration, work output, and ethics. Our findings suggest that the quality of research and the wellbeing of the lab members depend not only on purely scientific factors and routine research practices but are also dependent on the culture of the lab as it manifests in interpersonal relationships. The interviews reveal the critical role students ascribe to the PI in shaping the lab culture. Based on this study, we suggest how ethical lab cultures might be encouraged.
Our work is still cut out for us...

A. Berg

IF: 2.333

2008-03-01

Epileptic Disorders

Abstract:
Conflict in moral and nonmoral decision making: an empirical study coupled with a computational model

Flora Gautheron,Jean-Charles Quinton,Annique Smeding

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-024-01178-0

2024-03-08

Cognitive Processing

Abstract:While moral psychology research has extensively studied decision making using moral dilemmas, such high-conflict situations may not fully represent all moral decisions. Moreover, most studies on the effect of conflict have focused on nonmoral decisions, and it is unclear how it applies to the moral realm. The present mixed-method research investigates how conflict impacts moral compared to nonmoral decision making. In a preregistered empirical study ( ), participants made moral and nonmoral decisions with varying levels of conflict while their mouse trajectories were recorded. Results indicate that moral decisions were more stable in the presence of conflict, while still seeking compromise. In addition, decisions were more affected when conflict got higher. Mouse-tracking data further indicate that some factors are impacting the decision process earlier than others, supporting the relevance of tracing methods to dig into finer-grained decision dynamics. We also present a computational model that aims to capture decision mechanisms and how conflict and morality influence decision making. The model uses dynamic neural fields coupled with sensorimotor control to map a continuous decision space. Two model versions were compared: one with greater perceptual weight for moral information, and another with earlier processing of moral versus nonmoral information. The simulated data more successfully reproduced empirical patterns for the second version, thus providing insights into the underlying decision processes for both moral and nonmoral decisions, in the presence of conflict or not.

psychology, experimental
Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations.

S. Lirtzman,J. Rizzo,R. House

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2391486

1970-06-01

Abstract:The literature indicates that dysfunctional individual and organizational consequences result from the existence of role conflict and role ambiguity in complex organizations. Yet, systematic measurement and empirical testing of these role constructs is lacking. This study describes the development and testing of questionnaire measures of role conflict and ambiguity. Analyses of responses of managers show these two constructs to be factorially identifiable and independent. Derived measures of role conflict and ambiguity tend to correlate in two samples in expected directions with measures of organizational and managerial practices and leader behavior, and with member satisfaction, anxiety, and propensity to leave the organization.

Psychology,Business
Conflict(s) of interest in peer review: its origins and possible solutions

Anton Oleinik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9426-z

Abstract:Scientific communication takes place at two registers: first, interactions with colleagues in close proximity-members of a network, school of thought or circle; second, depersonalised transactions among a potentially unlimited number of scholars can be involved (e.g., author and readers). The interference between the two registers in the process of peer review produces a drift toward conflict of interest. Three particular cases of peer review are differentiated: journal submissions, grant applications and applications for tenure. The current conflict of interest policies do not cover all these areas. Furthermore, they have a number of flaws, which involves an excessive reliance on scholars' personal integrity. Conflicts of interest could be managed more efficiently if several elements and rules of the judicial process were accepted in science. The analysis relies on both primary and secondary data with a particular focus on Canada.
Fostering Responsible Conduct of Research for Early-Stage Investigators: Challenges and Opportunities

Laura Sinko,Laura A Baehr,Elizabeth Heller Murray,Julia Kobulsky,Gabriella M Mcloughlin,Krista Schroeder,Leah M Schumacher

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15248399241278966

2024-09-10

Abstract:The rise of academic misconduct poses significant challenges to the integrity and credibility of scholarly research. Early-stage investigators (ESIs), particularly those representing marginalized groups, face unique pressures in navigating the "publish or perish" paradigm while establishing their careers. This commentary articulates strategies for cultivating research environments conducive to the responsible conduct of research (RCR) for ESIs. By establishing shared values, planning research meticulously, conducting research collaboratively, and reporting findings transparently, ESIs can foster a culture of prevention and accountability in research. Ultimately, navigating beyond traditional methodologies to support RCR necessitates a fundamental reimagining of academic culture, reconceptualizing productivity to prioritize quality over quantity, and to encompass "invisible" work often shouldered by investigators with marginalized identities. Addressing scientific misconduct challenges requires a whole-system approach, encompassing individual leadership, policy changes, and institutional accountability. By implementing concrete strategies and systemic reforms, academia can reaffirm its commitment to responsible research conduct and safeguard the integrity of scholarly endeavors.
What Future Engineers and Scientists Learn About Ethics

W. Gale Cutler

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1992.11670862

1992-11-01

Abstract:We have come to accept the fact that, if given a chance, all too many Americans will cheat, whether they are college students, purchasing managers, engineers, or company executives. This article deals, not with theory, but with everyday applications of ethics, which are urgent. The public's worry about professional ethics in general spills over to concern about the need to put ethical issues into science and engineering curricula. A number of universities are making significant progress using the “pervasive” method of integrating case studies involving ethical issues into regular engineering courses. Professional societies and many major corporations support efforts to make scientists and engineers critically examine their ethical values. Ethics training is needed for all engineers and scientists in order that they may acquire the skill of making decisions based on an appropriate set of values.

management,business,engineering, industrial
How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety

Henriette Bruun,Louise Milling,Daniel Wittrock,Søren Mikkelsen,Lotte Huniche

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-024-01061-9

2024-05-18

Abstract:Background: Ethical challenges constitute an inseparable part of daily decision-making processes in all areas of healthcare. Ethical challenges are associated with moral distress that can lead to burnout. Clinical ethics support has proven useful to address and manage such challenges. This paper explores how prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges. The study is part of a larger action research project to develop and test an approach to clinical ethics support that is sensitive to the context of emergency medicine. Methods: We explored ethical challenges and management strategies in three focus groups, with 15 participants in total, each attended by emergency medical technicians, paramedics, and prehospital anaesthesiologists. Focus groups were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The approach to data analysis was systematic text condensation approach. Results: We stratified the management of ethical challenges into actions before, during, and after incidents. Before incidents, participants stressed the importance of mutual understandings, shared worldviews, and a supportive approach to managing emotions. During an incident, the participants employed moral perception, moral judgments, and moral actions. After an incident, the participants described sharing ethical challenges only to a limited extent as sharing was emotionally challenging, and not actively supported by workplace culture, or organisational procedures. The participants primarily managed ethical challenges informally, often using humour to cope. Conclusion: Our analysis supports and clarifies that confidence, trust, and safety in relation to colleagues, management, and the wider organisation are essential for prehospital emergency personnel to share ethical challenges and preventing moral distress turning into burnout.
Creativity and Ethics: The Relationship of Creative and Ethical Problem-Solving

Michael D. Mumford,Ethan P. Waples,Alison L. Antes,Ryan P. Brown,Shane Connelly,Stephen T. Murphy,Lynn D. Devenport

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410903579619

IF: 2.032

2010-02-10

Creativity Research Journal

Abstract:Students of creativity have long been interested in the relationship between creativity and deviant behaviors such as criminality, mental disease, and unethical behavior. In the present study we wished to examine the relationship between creative thinking skills and ethical decision-making among scientists. Accordingly, 258 doctoral students in the health, biological, and social sciences were asked to complete a measure of creative processing skills (e.g., problem definition, conceptual combination, idea generation) and a measure of ethical decision-making examining four domains, data management, study conduct, professional practices, and business practices. It was found that ethical decision-making in all four of these areas was related to creative problem-solving processes with late cycle processes (e.g., idea generation and solution monitoring) proving particularly important. The implications of these findings for understanding the relationship between creative and deviant thought are discussed.

psychology, multidisciplinary, educational
The influence of role conflict and self-interest on lying in organizations

Steven L. Grover,Chun Hui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00871676

IF: 6.331

1994-04-01

Journal of Business Ethics

Abstract:The self-interest paradigm predicts that unethical behavior occurs when such behavior benefits the actor. A recent model of lying behavior, however, predicts that lying behavior results from an individual's inability to meet conflicting role demands. The need to reconcile the self-interest and role conflict theories prompted the present study, which orthogonally manipulated the benefit from lying and the conflicting role demands. A model integrating the two theories predicts the results, which showed that both elements — self benefit and role conflict — influenced lying, separately and interactively. Additionally, the relative strength of the roles in conflict affected their level of influence. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.

business,ethics
WORK‐FAMILY ROLE SYNTHESIS: INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL DETERMINANTS

Ellen Ernst Kossek,Raymond A. Noe,Beverly J. DeMarr

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022820

1999-02-01

International Journal of Conflict Management

Abstract:In light of the dramatic social transformations occurring in the nature of family and worker demands, nearly all employees today need to make decisions on how to manage work and family roles. Drawing on role theory, we provide a summary framework for understanding individual, family, and organizational influences on the self‐management of work and family roles. Work‐family role synthesis is defined as the strategies an individual uses to manage the enactment of work and caregiving roles. It involves decision‐making choices governing boundary management and role embracement of multiple roles. We present hypotheses and a research agenda for examining antecedents and consequences of employee strategies for managing work and family roles.

communication
Tetraspanins and vascular functions.

Feng Zhang,J. Kotha,L. Jennings,Xin A. Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/cvr/cvp080

IF: 13.081

2009-07-01

Cardiovascular Research

Abstract:Tetraspanins are multiple membrane-spanning proteins that likely function as the organizers of membrane microdomains. Tetraspanins associate with other membrane-bound molecules such as cell-adhesion proteins, growth factor receptors, and Ig superfamily members and regulate key cellular processes such as adhesion, migration, and fusion. Tetraspanins are widely expressed in vascular and haematopoietic cells and are involved in both physiological and pathological processes related to angiogenesis, vascular injury, thrombosis, and haemostasis. A wide body of evidence suggests that tetraspanins directly regulate the development and functions of the vascular system and the pathogenesis of vascular diseases. This article reviews current understanding of the roles of tetraspanins in vascular functions.
Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure

David Robert Grimes,Chris T. Bauch,John P. A. Ioannidis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171511

IF: 3.5

2018-01-01

Royal Society Open Science

Abstract:Scientific publication is immensely important to the scientific endeavour. There is, however, concern that rewarding scientists chiefly on publication creates a perverse incentive, allowing careless and fraudulent conduct to thrive, compounded by the predisposition of top-tier journals towards novel, positive findings rather than investigations confirming null hypothesis. This potentially compounds a reproducibility crisis in several fields, and risks undermining science and public trust in scientific findings. To date, there has been comparatively little modelling on factors that influence science trustworthiness, despite the importance of quantifying the problem. We present a simple phenomenological model with cohorts of diligent, careless and unethical scientists, with funding allocated by published outputs. This analysis suggests that trustworthiness of published science in a given field is influenced by false positive rate, and pressures for positive results. We find decreasing available funding has negative consequences for resulting trustworthiness, and examine strategies to combat propagation of irreproducible science.

multidisciplinary sciences

Oral mucositis in head and neck cancer.

PI3K/Akt inhibition modulates multidrug resistance and activates NF-kappaB in murine lymphoma cell lines.

The Effect of Value-Focused Discussions on Scientists' Ethical Decision Making

Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work.

Decision making with conflicting information: influencing factors and best practice guidelines

Scientist's Role Choice in Decision-making: With Comments on Honest Broker

The Cultural Production of Everyday Ethics in Two University STEM Labs

[Conflicts of Interest in Research and Clinical Practice]

Student views on the culture of STEM research laboratories: Results from an interview study

Our work is still cut out for us...

Conflict in moral and nonmoral decision making: an empirical study coupled with a computational model

Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations.

Conflict(s) of interest in peer review: its origins and possible solutions

Fostering Responsible Conduct of Research for Early-Stage Investigators: Challenges and Opportunities

What Future Engineers and Scientists Learn About Ethics

How prehospital emergency personnel manage ethical challenges: the importance of confidence, trust, and safety

Creativity and Ethics: The Relationship of Creative and Ethical Problem-Solving

The influence of role conflict and self-interest on lying in organizations

WORK‐FAMILY ROLE SYNTHESIS: INDIVIDUAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL DETERMINANTS

Tetraspanins and vascular functions.

Modelling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure